The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aon (company) → Aon plc – WP:CONCISE "plc" is enough to distinguish it from other articles and no other companies with the name, "Aon," have their own articles. ^Wiinter_U 07:35, 11 March 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). C F A 21:37, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• This is is standard disambiguation rather than using legal suffixes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually both methods are acceptable per WP:NCCORP#Disambiguation, but I would agree that it should go through a full discussion to change the title from the "(company)" parenthetical disambiguation to the legal suffix. In similar previous RM discussions I have seen, it has frequently depended on whether the legal suffix is included in its WP:COMMONAME used by most reliable sources, and using "(company)" is instead generally preferred when reliable sources rarely use the legal suffix. Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. The current disambiguator is far more common and the legal suffix is not part of the company's common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am going to agree with Zzyzx11. Both pratices have merit on Wikipedia, an example would be Apple Inc. The discussion should be whether plc is WP:COMMONAME enough to be included for WP:NATURALDIS. Edit: however, I agree with Necrothesp as it does not seem to be part of the common name. cookie monster 755 10:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]