![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Minor change of the university name
Change the name from [Al Hadbaa University College] to [Al-Hadba University] Salah ismaeel (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 17 February 2025
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus Mohammed Qays comment has been disregarded as WP:JUSTAVOTE, which leaves nobody having provided the requested evidence * Pppery * it has begun... 17:48, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Al-Hadba'a University College → Al-Hadba University – Institution has officially changed its name from college to university Salah ismaeel (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. wbm1058 (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Iraq and WikiProject Higher education have been notified of this discussion. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose for lack of evidence – per WP:NAMECHANGES, there should be evidence that independent, reliable, English-language sources are now using the new name. As explained at WP:OFFICIALNAMES, we use the common name used in English on Wikipedia, not the official name (although these are often the same). The policy doesn't seem to say explicitly what should happen if there aren't a lot of English-language sources written after the change; I would assume that WP:USENATIVE applies and if usage has clearly changed in reliable independent sources in the native language that could be carried over. I'm open to changing this vote if suitable sources are provided. Robminchin (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- I support moving the article to the new title. Mohammed Qays (🗣) 07:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose for lack of evidence – per WP:NAMECHANGES, there should be evidence that independent, reliable, English-language sources are now using the new name. As explained at WP:OFFICIALNAMES, we use the common name used in English on Wikipedia, not the official name (although these are often the same). The policy doesn't seem to say explicitly what should happen if there aren't a lot of English-language sources written after the change; I would assume that WP:USENATIVE applies and if usage has clearly changed in reliable independent sources in the native language that could be carried over. I'm open to changing this vote if suitable sources are provided. Robminchin (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You must be logged in to post a comment.