The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. – robertsky (talk) 03:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Age-of-consent reform → Age of consent reform – Per MOS:HYPHEN, if the term "age of consent" doesn't need hyphens. Absolutiva (talk) 09:26, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me, lean support. Carlp941 (talk) 18:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – "Age of consent" doesn't need hyphens when it's a noun... e.g. "I want to talk about the age of consent that this country currently uses." However, when it's a compound adjective, we're not talking about the age of "consent reform" – i.e. how old "consent reform" is – which is how it would be interpreted without hyphens.   — TARDIS builder^✉     ★       10:37, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This reverses

10:21, 16 January 2025 TARDIS Builder talk contribs block  82 bytes +82  TARDIS Builder moved page Age of consent reform to Age-of-consent reform: Fix grammar 

Which appears to be a recent bold move by User:TARDIS Builder. Andrewa (talk) 10:17, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pinging me, appreciated. – TARDIS builder^✉ 10:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose per TARDIS builder, and – contrary to the nom – MOS:HYPHEN doesn't support this move. Ham II (talk) 10:52, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per above. Including the hyphens is correct if it's a compound modifier.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]