This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Language / Analytic / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Metaphysics Philosophy of language Analytic philosophy Contemporary philosophy

I've been doing some reading on this, and it seems like many of the Christian theologians of old, at least since the Scholastic era, viewed the doctrine of the Trinity as necessary, yet only knowable a posteriori through scripture.

Of course, this occurs under a specifically religious context (whereas Kripke is more generalizable and universally agreeable), but perhaps this and other pre-Kripke attitudes should be mentioned in this article. Mannana308 (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]