Nominator: Stevie fae Scotland (talk · contribs) 23:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Eva The Lefty (talk · contribs) 12:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are no glaring issues. The article seems large and as it covers the relevant points.

1. It is well written with no major issues

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   No issues, MoS followed without any major issues.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   No issues.

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   Sources are all established news outlets or local news such as The Orcadian.

   c. (OR):

   No original research all statements are reasonably sourced.

   d. (plagiarism):

   No plagiarism found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   Nothing overdetailed or subjective.

   b. (focused):

   In general very easy-to-read, especially the background section.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Nothing biased nor subjective:

   This serves as an accurate account of events.

5. It is rather stable.

   No edit wars:

   If any edit wars have happened they have stopped, there being a reasonable time frame where the article has remained stable.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   No problems sole picture being a map with no copyright rationale.

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   N/A

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

   All criteria is fufilled!

(Criteria marked are unassessed)