GA review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nominator: Stevie fae Scotland (talk · contribs) 19:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Eva The Lefty (talk · contribs) 17:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
GA criteria
- Prose: Seems fine, rather understandable to any audience, no spelling/grammar mistakes spotted.
- MoS: Seems in accordance with the MoS correct date formats capitalisation etc.
- Ref layout is largely correct
- All sources used are trusted local new sources or official government files(PDFs).
- No plagiarism found.
- Broadness: The topic is tackled with sufficient broadness.
- Focus: The amount of detail the article goes into is standard for the type of article it is.
- Neutral and stable.
- Image All pictures relevant to the topic with no copyright violations whatsoever.
}}
- N/A
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- All criteria is fufilled!
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked 
are unassessed)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You must be logged in to post a comment.