Notability table

Running my AfC table.

EF5's Tornado AfD Table
Criteria no. Sub-criteria Description Pass? Fail? Comments
1 (Coverage) 1a Any coverage? checkY CBS News, 10 years after the tornado
1b Any significant coverge? (e.g. CNN or the NYT) checkY CBS News, 10 years after the tornado
1c Any lasting coverage past 6 months after the tornado? checkY CBS News, 10 years after the tornado
2 (Strength) 2a Was the tornado EF0-EF2? Usually a sign of non-notability, there are exceptions to this though
2b Was the tornado EF3? May be a sign of notability
2c Was the tornado EF4? checkY Usually a sign of notability
2d Was the tornado EF5? If a post-2013 EF5, then an instant pass. Usually a quick-pass
3 (Damage) 3a Did the tornado kill at least one person? checkY One person.
3b Did the tornado injure at least one person? checkY 14 people.
3c Did the tornado cause monetary damage totaling over $200,000 USD? Question? Damage estimates unknown.
4 (Aftermath) 4a Did the tornado significantly damage a town? checkY Did damage towns, none significantly.
4b Any notable deaths? checkY None that I'm aware of.
5 (Content) 5a Is the article not a CFORK of an existing section? checkY No section on tornado.
5b Can the content not be easily merged into a section? checkY No section on tornado.
5c Is the article longer than the page on its respective outbreak? checkY
5d Is the article a GA, FA or has recently been featured on DYK? checkY Not published yet.
6 (Overall) 6a Are at least five of these criterion met, with exceptions made if needed? checkY If at least 1b, 3b, 3c, 5c and 1c are met, then a pass is warranted. If not, then a fail is warranted. Exceptions can be made at my discretion.
Final verdict: Pass: Will publish.
Allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2010_Conger%E2%80%93Albert_Lea_tornado
No tags for this post.