Vincent van Gogh: Diggers in Schenkweg
 |
Artist |
Vincent van Gogh (1853–1890) |
 |
Alternative names |
Vincent Willem van Gogh |
Description |
Dutch painter, draftsperson and printmaker |
Date of birth/death |
30 March 1853  |
29 July 1890  |
Location of birth/death |
Zundert  |
Auvers-sur-Oise |
Work period |
between circa 1880 and circa July 1890 date QS:P,+1850-00-00T00:00:00Z/7,P1319,+1880-00-00T00:00:00Z/9,P1326,+1890-07-00T00:00:00Z/10,P1480,Q5727902 |
Work location |
Netherlands ( Etten, The Hague, Nuenen, …, before 1886 date QS:P,+1886-00-00T00:00:00Z/7,P1326,+1886-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 ), Paris (1886–1887), Arles (1888–1889), Saint-Rémy-de-Provence (1889–1890), Auvers-sur-Oise (1890) |
Authority file |
|
artist QS:P170,Q5582 |
|
Title |
English: Diggers in Schenkweg |
Object type |
watercolor painting  |
Date |
July 1882 (De La Faille and Hulsker), February 1883 (editors vangoghletters.org) |
Medium |
watercolor medium QS:P186,Q22915256 |
Dimensions |
height: 33.5 cm (13.1 in); width: 59.5 cm (23.4 in) dimensions QS:P2048,33.5U174728 dimensions QS:P2049,59.5U174728 |
Collection |
Private collection institution QS:P195,Q768717 |
Object history |
- H.P. Bremmer, The Hague
- W. Brinkman, Schipluiden, Netherlands [1953]
- W. Weinberg, Scarsdale [1955]
- Sale London [Sotheby] 10 July 1957, 53
- Mr. Fischbein, London
- Mrs. Gaby Schreiber;
- Sale London (Christie) 27 November 1964, addenda 55 A
- Galerie Beyeler, Basle [R 1966]
- Present owner unknown (De La Faille 1970)
|
Exhibition history |
- First exhibited 1953 Berlin, 13
|
Notes |
Catalogues raisonnés:
- F927: Faille, Jacob Baart de la (1970) [1928] The Works of Vincent van Gogh. His Paintings and Drawings, Amsterdam: J.M. Meulenhoff, no. 927 .
- JH161 : Jan Hulsker (1980), The Complete Van Gogh, Oxford: Phaidon, no. 161.
- De La Faille dates the drawing as summer 1882, as does Hulsker quoting letter 251 (Hulsker p. 54). However the editors at http://vangoghletters.org give it as February 1883 in letter 306, quoting exhib. cat. The Hague 1990, pp. 33-34 for its identification.
- Letters
- Letter 251 to Theo van Gogh. The Hague, Wednesday, 26 July 1882. Vincent van Gogh: The Letters. Van Gogh Museum. "I also have a second of the Rijswijk meadows in which the same subject takes on an entirely different aspect through being seen from a different height and viewpoint. [Hulsker thought this F927, the present drawing. The editors (n. 6) think it is F943 (Rooftops)]"
- Letter 306 to Theo van Gogh. The Hague, Saturday, 3 February 1883. Vincent van Gogh: The Letters. Van Gogh Museum. "I’ve nevertheless been working on a watercolour sketch, again of diggers, or rather road-menders, here in Schenkweg, but it’s no good."
- Letter 322 to Theo van Gogh. The Hague, on or about Friday, 2 March 1883. Vincent van Gogh: The Letters. Van Gogh Museum. "You will now have received, at least I sent it yesterday afternoon, a very rough sketch of a watercolour. This in answer to your question about it.
Yet it wasn’t done just now. I began it a few months ago, and since then it has had a lick or two now and again. Has remained in a rough-hewn state, though. I’ve since done many studies, that is drawings, of figures and especially of heads too. Precisely with an eye to such scenes as this sketch depicts, in which the finishing consists of putting texture and character into the heads, hands and feet especially."
|
References |
- ; Naifeh, Steven; Smith, Gregory White (2011) Van Gogh: The Life, Profile Books. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved on 25 January 2014. ISBN: 978-1846680106.
|
Source/Photographer |
vangoghletters.org Letter 306 |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
|
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that " faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.
| |
You must be logged in to post a comment.