The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, How Do You Do? → La Raspa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete huh? What? Dronebogus (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as confusing. According to my Google Books search, this sentence seems to be used for training kids in manners or for people who are learning basic English language. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Dead Leaves (upcoming film) → Aki Kaurismäki  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Doesn't make sense to redirect this title to the redirect's subject's potential director when the subject of the redirect may be attached to other notable subjects with articles. Also, WP:REDLINK applies. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Veverve (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the worst possible case of crystal Dronebogus (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 08:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Pros and Cons of the Euro → Euro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

​I'm not nominating this redirect on the basis of the unusual title, but because the target is too broad for it to be useful. I could understand if, for example, it pointed to a section named "Support and criticism", or even just "Response" or "Reception". The article on the euro doesn't have any of these sections (Criticism of the European Union is a redirect to Euroscepticism). The redirect also doesn't have page history or mainspace backlinks worth preserving. For all these reasons, it should be deleted as a costly title. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete deceptive POV redirect Dronebogus (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think it gets used much; the page view statistics show 577 views since its creation in 2007. There were reasons I thought it was appropriate in 2007; but I don't think those reasons are applicable today. I think most people looking for information on the Euro will just search for Euro. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete – 577 views in the last 8 years (as far back as data goes at the current source) certainly indicates enough use to outweigh the minor maintenance burden, but I don't think this redirect is helpful as it stands, and don't really feel it should be a redirect title to be honest due to how synthesis-y it sounds. J947 † ^edits 06:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget to Euro#Economics, which does (albeit in a roundabout and indirect way) discuss the economic benefits and risks of countries adopting the euro. (Also, there was briefly an article at this title; it was moved to this title from Arguments for and against the single european currency?, then deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arguments for and against the single european currency?. I wouldn't support making the latter title into a redirect, though, because it's phrased like a question/essay prompt.) Duckmather (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Clearly a costly redirect as stated by the nom, so definitely no point in keeping. I also don't think that retargeting this anywhere would be helpful; though I do note that the above suggestion by Duckmather seems decent, it wouldn't be a completely precise target in my opinion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Monster (upcoming film) → Hirokazu Kore-eda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Doesn't make sense to redirect this title to the redirect's subject's potential director when the subject of the redirect may be attached to other notable subjects with articles. Also, WP:REDLINK applies. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Veverve (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Limbo (upcoming Hong Kong film) → Limbo (2021 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Murder Mystery 2 (upcoming film) → Murder Mystery 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No longer upcoming, see WP:UFILM. Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per previous RfDs where there is a consensus to delete these sorts of redirects. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Veverve (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  This has nothing to do with CRYSTAL, but okay. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Reverse crystal? “Predicting” events that have already occurred? Dronebogus (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as no longer useful --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Account of My Life → The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Way too vague, no mention at the target. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I assume this is an alternate title? Dronebogus (talk) 19:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• His Autobiography → The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Way too vague, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly the least clear redirect ever Dronebogus (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 2038 Asian Games → Asian Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

WP:FUTURE and WP:TOOSOON, same reason we don't have 2044 Summer Olympics as a redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Veverve (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:TOOSOON, won't have bidding process soon. --Aleenf1 22:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a redirect and WP:ATD. There is already some coverage but it would be best to have a full article till later. A comment on the Asian Games article would be sufficient for now. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an incredibly shiny, bright WP:CRYSTAL ... oh, and the WP:REDLINK potential in like 15 years. Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete arbitrary future date for regularly occurring event that will presumably continue indefinitely. Dronebogus (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because it is unhelpful to the reader as it stands; the target article has no information on the topic. 2034 Asian Games and all earlier exist, by the way. J947 † ^edits 10:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Mount Everett (Canmore) → Grotto Mountain  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure how this relates to the target. Not mentioned there anyplace. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I cannot find a source linking the two. There doesn't seem to be a "Mount Everett" in Alberta. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly a hoax Dronebogus (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 13:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Gary Metropolitan Area → Chicago metropolitan area  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unclear why the former (not used since 1896) name of Hodgkins, Illinois (a village with 1500 population) would be a plausible redirect for the Chicago metropolitan area. Miscapitalised, and only has 58 pageviews since its creation in 2017. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 15:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a {{r from incorrect name}} {{r from former name}} (see below). There is no Gary Metropolitan Area, but the Gary, IN Metropolitan Division is part of the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Metropolitan Area. - Eureka Lott 16:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Neutral. I get Eureka Lott's point, but since Gary, as the name of a city, is ambiguous (see Gary#Places), there's no guarantee this is the "Gary" that readers are intending to locate. Steel1943 (talk) 21:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  None of the other populated places listed at Gary#Places come close to having metropolitan areas. The largest of them has a population of 762. There's no realistic chance of confusion here. - Eureka Lott 23:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Not particularly if another "Gary" is close to another actual "metropolitan area" (which is the case with the current situation.) That's why I'm thinking better safe than sorry. Steel1943 (talk) 23:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I looked a bit closer, and this can be considered a historical name for the area. Prior to 2000, it was known as the Gary, IN PMSA (Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area). See [1] (The PMSA/CMSA nomenclature is no longer used.) Updated my !vote above. - Eureka Lott 00:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Don't think I have a dog in this fight anymore, so changing my vote. Steel1943 (talk) 00:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per EurekaLott. Just to make it clear, this isn't based off 1500 Gary, but off 70000 Gary. J947 † ^edits 10:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. However, because there was a consensus against keeping the redirect as-is and a disambiguation page would consist of the first two entries at Pahlavi dynasty#Heads of House of Pahlavi, I have retargeted it there. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 01:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Shah Pahlavi → Reza Shah  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I propose we disambiguate this redirect because in addition to Reza Shah Pahlavi, these words can also refer to his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. NotReallySoroka (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Sounds good to me. Nv8200pa talk 00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support disambiguation - It could even be reasonable to redirect to the younger shah, considering he is often simply known as "the Shah" and by far a primary topic. Estar8806 (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Pahlavi dynasty#Heads of House of Pahlavi: Both of the Pahlavis to hold the title Shah are listed with some context TartarTorte 13:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Pahlavi dynasty#Heads of House of Pahlavi per TartarTorte. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation allows for a more succinct page conducive to finding the Pahlavis themselves. Not·Really·Soroka 05:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Requested moves#Undiscussed moves. ✗plicit 23:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:BOLDMOVE → Help:How to move a page  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Created by a now blocked user in an appear effort to help justify their controversy moves. Has no incoming links and I've only seen it mentioned in edit summaries by the creating user and a user that has now been blocked as a sock (ex: Special:Diff/1139343657). The word "bold" also doesn't appear at target so delete. Skynxnex (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 17:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Undiscussed moves: as where I expected this shortcut to take me when I clicked on it, rather than to this RfD page. HouseBlaster^talk 18:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per HouseBlaster. Although the redirect has a shady history I think it can be useful. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per HouseBlaster. I also thought that the redirect would most naturally point to our guidance on undiscussed moves. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Ratris Khel Chale. (non-admin closure) Carpimaps (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Raat Ka Khel Saara → And TV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure how this relates to the target article, not mentioned there (or on their list of programs). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It was previously aired on And TV. It was dubbed from Marathi series Ratris Khel Chale. 49.32.180.67 (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Ratris Khel Chale per anon, where it is mentioned. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Ratris Khel Chale. Seems to be its Hindi dub's alternative name. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada. (non-admin closure) Carpimaps (talk) 05:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Pattedari Pratibha → Zee Kannada  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Niguda Ratri → Zee Kannada  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, List of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada or anywhere else on Wikipedia. Delete unless a duly-sourced mention can be added somewhere. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Both shows are mentioned on List of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada in Former broadcast section. 49.32.180.136 (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada per anon. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Porta Fidei → Pope Benedict XVI  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at the target. It refers to a specific document that is not mentioned anywhere else on WP. Therefore, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 00:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete incomprehensible to the average reader Dronebogus (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Haven't looked at this redirect at all, but how would the average reader come across this redirect? The use case here is a reader more in-the-know wanting to find en.wp content on it. J947 † ^edits 04:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    But there is no information on it. Dronebogus (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey, there you go, that's a way better argument for deletion right there. J947 † ^edits 06:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking now and I'm seeing several academic pieces that talk about this exact motu propio as well as the Year of Faith that it created. That being said, I support deletion per WP:REDYES, as this warrants its own page rather than a redirect to an article that does not mention it. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).