The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete; different Wikipedias have different standards. Johnleemk | Talk 06:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a vanity to me. Staecker 14:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — Agree with nom. It looks somewhat like a personal activity log or quasi-résumé. — RJH 15:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is a resumé and not a record of notability. If it is the user's own page, transfer the data to their Wikispace. If not, delete as violation of WP:BIO.  (aeropagitica)  17:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it's just a CV. Sliggy 18:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Although the article hade been revised basically, seems it to be, persons or matters outside the U.S. are less worth to be mentioned and edited at Wikipedia.org., even if they are obviously eminent to be listed at foreign Wikipedia pages, for example http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christophe_Didillon We think Wikipedia.org should be a cosmopolitan matter. B. D. 19.01.06 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Didillon (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.