The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Centers of power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A pointless list without any references and vague criteria for inclusion. Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 10:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 10:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 10:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Incredible that such a vague and useless list has existed since 2004. Reywas92^Talk 14:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete worst geopolitics article I’ve seen since the now-deleted List of Regimes. Extremely broad and random, zero citations, bad title (should be “list of etc.”), only non-list content is a dictionary definition. Would need a mountain of WP:TNT at the absolute minimum. Dronebogus (talk) 00:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wholly unsourced, no proper WP:LISTCRITERIA, very possibly an improper WP:CONTENTFORK of something or other but so poorly described that it's difficult to tell. Frankly, it's embarrassing that we have this on Wikipedia and have had it for years. The concept itself may or may not be notable; WP:TNT applies regardless. TompaDompa (talk) 14:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.