Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Umar, you may be blocked from editing. Bowler the Carmine | talk 07:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Umayyad-387 (talk) 12:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm shocked by your removal of my additions to Umar page, citing unreliable sources. It's clear that in your view, Sunni books are unreliable, while Shia books are considered credible. Your understanding of Islam is lacking. Verified information about the Sahaba can only be found through Hadiths, not through sources written 1000 years later by non-Muslims.

Your bias towards Shiaism is evident. If you're going to promote Shiaism, consider renaming Wikipedia to ShiaPedia. I don't need your warning. If you want to block me, go ahead. It won't make a difference. Sunni Muslims will boycott Wikipedia from now on. Wikipedia has become a tool for promoting Shiaism rather than a credible source of information.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IDHT religious POV-pushing. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]