Welcome!
Hello, Senorartkat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please review WP:CITEIMDB and the guidelines associated with using IMDB as a reference.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. AldezD (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding links to IMDB as references. WP:CITEIMDB outlines why IMDB cannot be used as a reference. AldezD (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar. AldezD (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar. AldezD (talk) 23:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
IMDB
is user edited and thus cannot be regarded as a WP:reliable source Once your block is ended, you may add content cited from WP:reliable sources. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC) {unblock|reason=Hi there. Unfortunately the only other citable source I can find in order to prove my (and Larry Applewhite's) authorship of this song is the credits at the end of the film itself. But I assure you you will find it there.}
- Sorry back at you. Then you have a conflict of interest (WP:COI). And we nevertheless require reliable sources independent of you and the subject. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Senorartkat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How about I send you a copy of my royalty statements from ASCAP?
Decline reason:
This does not convince me you have read and understood WP:RS and WP:V. How would other editors be able to verify the royalty statements? I'm not arguing that your edits are factually correct here, only that they weren't properly cited and this suggestion you give here goes against our core principle of verifiability. Yamla (talk) 13:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It seems to me as though the job of an encyclopedia is to present the facts on a given subject. And it's an EASILY VERIFIABLE fact that this song is featured in the film version of "To Wong Foo"; it's listed in the credits at the end! Why is there no citation required for "China Girl" by Robert Walsh, which was not featured on the soundtrack and as far as I can see also has no verifiable source? I'm not trying to be difficult here--I just want credit for my work! I can even tell you the exact moment in the movie when the song is heard.Senorartkat (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Senorartkat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm also not sure how it's a conflict of interest if I'm merely adding factual information to correct an oversight.
Decline reason:
You're blocked for adding inadequately sourced material. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Fixed your malformed unblock request. SQLQuery me! 23:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC) It seems to me as though the job of an encyclopedia is to present the facts on a given subject. And it's an EASILY VERIFIABLE fact that this song is featured in the film version of "To Wong Foo"; it's listed in the credits at the end! Why is there no citation required for "China Girl" by Robert Walsh, which was not featured on the soundtrack and as far as I can see also has no verifiable source? I'm not trying to be difficult here--I just want credit for my work! I can even tell you the exact moment in the movie when the song is heard.Senorartkat (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Senorartkat (talk) 05:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Senorartkat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Here you go. It's at 1:07. [1] Senorartkat (talk) 01:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not sure why you posted an unblock request. Best I can figure, your block expired long ago. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi--Apparently I'm on autoblock, and I wasn't able to figure out how to undo that from the instructions on Wikipedia. What I sent you is a video of the movie credits, in which the song is listed. I am looking to have the "citation needed" removed. I would think that the credits from the movie itself would suffice as proof...Senorartkat (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Well drat. What is the exact message you get? Is there a number? I could not find an autoblock when I looked yesterday. As for the credits, Not sure that would work. If we ever get you unblocked you can discuss at the talk page or on Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources. @Oshwah: Can you find/fix autoblock?--Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, what's the autoblock ID that's given? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.