This editor is a WikiGnome. This user is a participant in WikiProject Ice Hockey. Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Hello to all fellow Wikipedians. GoodDay 22:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

This user has been on Wikipedia for 19 years, 3 months and 19 days.

You may be wondering why my archives only start at August 2007. The reason: I didn't archive my pages before that date, I merely deleted them (as I didn't know how to archive). Therefore, if anyone wishes to see material before August 2007? check out this talkpage's 'history'.

I've an Awards page, where I keep a list of Wikipedia awards bestowed upon me.

Edit records

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GoodDay
Opened/Closed in 2012.
Amended in 2013, 2014 & 2016

Archives

Aug–Sept 2007 Sept 2007–Feb 2008 Feb–Apr 2008 Apr–Jul 2008 Jul–Oct 2008 Oct–Nov 2008 Nov 2008–Jan 2009 Jan–Feb 2009 Feb–Mar 2009 Mar–May 2009 May–Jun 2009 Jun–Jul 2009 Jul–Sept 2009 Sept–Oct 2009 Oct–Nov 2009 Nov–Dec 2009 Dec 2009–Jan 2010 Jan–Feb 2010 Feb 2010 Feb–Apr 2010 Apr–Jun 2010 Jun–Oct 2010 Oct–Nov 2010 Nov 2010–Jan 2011 Jan–Feb 2011 Feb 2011 Feb–Mar 2011 Mar–Apr 2011 Apr–May 2011 May–Nov 2011 Nov 2011–Feb 2012 Feb–May 2012 May–Aug 2012 Aug 2012–Feb 2013 Feb 2013–May 2014 May 2014–Jun 2015 Jun 2015–Feb 2016 Feb–Jul 2016 Jul 2016–Jan 2017 Jan 2017–Jan 2018 Jan 2018–Feb 2019 Feb 2019–Jul 2020 Jul 2020–Aug 2021 Aug–Dec 2021 Dec 2021–Jul 2022 Jul 2022–Jan 2023 Jan–Dec 2023 Dec 2023–Feb 2024 Feb 2024–present

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hello, you recently used the following wording in articles: ..."Division I (or II, III) were two tournaments"... It's incorrect. The word "Division" is in the singular, so "Division was two tournaments" would be correct. See this talk. Personally, I wanted to avoid any doubt, so I started using the following wording in my articles: "Division consisted of two tournaments". So you should fix it; either the first or the second way. Thanks, Maiō T. (talk) 21:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very well @Maiō T.:, I didn't know there was a difference. GoodDay (talk) 23:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear GoodDay,

Hi! I’m sorry to bug you, but i recently saw that you removed my edits to the political party pages. I’m just wondering—why did you do it?

Thanks! RiverMan18 (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RiverMan18: it's easier to read the party names, when there's a white background. GoodDay (talk) 17:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but… is it ok if I put the changes back up? I personally think they can be read just fine (although that is just me), and there was recently a TfD regarding the changes.

Thanks! RiverMan18 (talk) 18:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RiverMan18: I won't revert you again. But, I recommend you seek consensus on the party talk-pages (particularly the Republican & Democratic party articles, as they get the most views), before restoring your changes. GoodDay (talk) 18:33, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok-I’ll do that. Thanks! RiverMan18 (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Lord! You're still here! Sarah777 (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently so & good to see you're still around. GoodDay (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GoodDay! I think that the article Template: Arizona Coyotes roster should be taken for a second redirect for discussion. The Utah Roster has changed a bunch since, and also, I couldn't clearly understand (In my POV) whether users were stating their support or opposition for people were stating their support or opposition for changing the target. So could you please help break each response down? To me it looked like opposition, but I might not understand each users stance. So could you please read clearly and help me understand their opinion? And help me with how to take it for redirect for discussion please? Thank you Servite et contribuere (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Servite et contribuere:, I'd recommend the template for deletion, now. GoodDay (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I might just make a backup template of their most recent roster, whether that is putting on my user page just in case the team does fold. Also, how do I do that? Servite et contribuere (talk) 20:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note, there's no roster templates for the Nordiques, Thrashers, North Stars, original Jets, Whalers, etc. GoodDay (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course there isn't😂. Those teams stopped existing before Wikipedia was even a thing. But there is one for the Thrashers redirecting to Winnipeg, so if anyone wants the final Thrashers roster, it is possible Servite et contribuere (talk) 20:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thrashers roster template, should also be deleted. GoodDay (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK. But I will put a backup nonetheless Servite et contribuere (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened up a discussion about this matter. GoodDay (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GoodDay. I'm going to look at the discussion. I personally believe the redirect target should be re discussed for discussing a deletion. Only one user made their opinion clear on whether it should redirect to the Utah Roster. I think it should be a Two Part discussion Servite et contribuere (talk) 09:36, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. GoodDay (talk) 14:26, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I might need help how to do both (In terms of what buttons to press). I am currently making a bunch of edits to avoid redirects to a former name. No not in (Ice) Hockey Servite et contribuere (talk) 19:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I not certain how to start a Template deletion. GoodDay (talk) 19:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Do you know at least how to start a discussion? Servite et contribuere (talk) 20:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe @Alaney2k: has or had nominated the template for deletion. GoodDay (talk) 20:08, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ppery has declined the request for speedy deletion Servite et contribuere (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That stinks. GoodDay (talk) 22:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, It was declined by Pppery. Not Ppery Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, GoodDay, the Cleveland Barons (NHL) should be titled Cleveland Barons, except that I missed a vote to vote in favor of a name change, and break a tie😬. I guess these things happen. Oh well, definitely not going to go change the discussion Servite et contribuere (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the 21st century. It's your turn now ;) Surtsicna (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've done about 'ten' of them. I don't have the energy for them all. Besides, I prefer keeping the 'bold titles'. Anyways, I'm soon opening an RFC at Village Pump (proposals), about removing 'order numberings' from infoboxes. GoodDay (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you preferred consistency above all. I am happy with only the most recent being done for now. Surtsicna (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've launched an RFC at Village Pump proposals, concerning numberings in officeholder infoboxes. GoodDay (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Surtsicna: BTW, I've restored your edits at the 1804 United States presidential election & 1944 United States presidential election articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The latter had been undone by @NavyBlueSunglasses:, fwiw. GoodDay (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How are you making so many edits, such as adding year of death, to so many articles so quickly? Is it an automated process? ErrorCorrection1 (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm prolific. GoodDay (talk) 04:51, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ErrorCorrection1 and upcoming Canadian election, redux. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]