• 68.185.170.118 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). . DatBot (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  Looks like a confused newbie. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• GoldenAthlete (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1199 (Unusual rate of edits from new user or IP, details). Note: Potential vandalbot. . DatBot (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 2.98.114.119 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). . DatBot (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• RobertPeterCohonPeterCoyote (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1199 (Unusual rate of edits from new user or IP, details). Note: Potential vandalbot. . DatBot (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  User is globally locked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Edzmplays (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). . DatBot (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  No disruption since being warned. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 184.147.21.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1199 (Unusual rate of edits from new user or IP, details). Note: Potential vandalbot. . DatBot (talk) 22:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. User has a problem with using edit summaries despite multiple messages. And they keep tripping the edit filter. But this is not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Leonbiengabrieltan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1199 (Unusual rate of edits from new user or IP, details). Note: Potential vandalbot. . DatBot (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 2001:1388:18:a71c:5d06:1:82c0:e578 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1199 (Unusual rate of edits from new user or IP, details). Note: Potential vandalbot. . DatBot (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

  Warned user. Multiple suspicious and unexplained edits. I mass reverted them. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Midwestmenace (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. . DatBot (talk) 01:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

  User is globally locked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 2406:3000:11:2006:9961:e78a:f067:d653 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 11 five times in the last 5 minutes (Warn and tag vandalism, details). . DatBot (talk) 03:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

  Warned user. Level II. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 180.252.163.104 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1340 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user changing times, details). . DatBot (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 180.252.163.104 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1199 (Unusual rate of edits from new user or IP, details). Note: Potential vandalbot. . DatBot (talk) 04:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. See above and the previous half dozen or more reports. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 129.126.35.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 04:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• 122.105.225.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 46 five times in the last 5 minutes ("Poop" vandalism, details). . DatBot (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• 2804:3244:166e:b6e9:5123:d2f:2ff5:894d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 05:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• 112.198.114.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 172 five times in the last 5 minutes (Section blanking, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. . DatBot (talk) 05:48, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• Mambappeeee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). . DatBot (talk) 05:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• 203.247.210.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 05:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• 203.247.210.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Chinese: LTA. Remsense ‥ 论 05:52, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently

Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 23 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• WRAPboiOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

  Comment: Seemingly promotional username but no promotional edits so far. An IP gave them a welcome message explaining the username issue. We should see how they respond as well as monitor further edits. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 02:16, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Ussolutions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• CCP Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 14:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• CS17LFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "f\.?c\.?$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file "FC" is an abbreviation of "Football Club" -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• EddykenzoyenanComg (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "dyke" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• RobertPeterCohonPeterCoyote (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• AnomieRichardDick (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Dicksize" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  We need to watch this one I think, but not to do with dicksize. It might be attacking Anomie. They've pretended to be an admin on their userpage. I'm suspicious. Secretlondon (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  Their work on commons and meta is clearly vandalism, and they seem to have an issue with women. Secretlondon (talk) 23:00, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Leafytrollface (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "troll" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file The word troll may imply an intent to disrupt Wikipedia - but that is not certain. Please use discretion to determine if this is a violation or not. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• KetchupSigmaOhioOneTwoThree (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• CCP Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Remsense ‥ 论 16:22, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

  One edit. We don't know what they are promoting yet - it could be the Chinese Communist Party but it's a bit of a jump. Secretlondon (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• SEOAgencyCardiff1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). One of their edits explains a company, and their username represents that company. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 04:54, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• PopTop Software (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IP vandalism that has been going on for literally years, ascribing various random games to the developer. The page protection should most likely be indefinite because the vandal is extremely persistent. Phazd (talk|contribs) 23:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2001:569:7287:4A00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

@Daniel Case I'm afraid this is not going to be useful because the vandal changes their IP easily enough. One week block for an IP that has done absolutely nothing but vandalism for several years is also a surprisingly mild measure. – Phazd (talk|contribs) 00:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

We'll see what they do. Some vandals understandably think nothing will happen to them ...until it does.

As for the length of the block, the page history shows only recent vandalism over the last two days from two IPs on the range and very little editing, disruptive or not, in the two years immediately preceding. Daniel Case (talk) 01:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Justin Jefferson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 03:05, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Thai Chinese (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Vandalized by the same user allegedly over and over again. Please give extended auto-confirmed protection to this page, as the person with subjective edits already has auto-confirmed status. He keeps inserting his own opinion, and not adhering to WP:NPOV policies. Pineapplethen (talk) 03:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Steve Moore (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection: Edit-warring/content dispute. Left guide (talk) 03:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Padmavathi Malladi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Young director and lots of competition may make her competitors want to change portions of the page. Chakrabartyprateek14 (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Shafiqur Rahman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: High level of IP and registered vandalism, Semi protection is needed. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Social Security (United States) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Politically contentious topic. Trump has spread conspiracies about deceased people receiving social security benefits. Recommend semi-protection for at least 4 years. RedDeadGuy (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Social Security Administration (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: See Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase § Social Security (United States). RedDeadGuy (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And pages are not protected pre-emptively. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Understood RedDeadGuy (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Magomed Ankalaev (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: high Vandalism Tejas chelamkuri09 (talk) 11:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: High level of vandalism by fans after ufc 313 Tejas chelamkuri09 (talk) 11:46, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Support Nswix (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Talk:Hephthalite–Gokturk raids of 614–616 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Kajmer05 (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Fatehpur, Barabanki (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs (possibly the same person) adding unsourced content and edit warring about it [1] [2] [3] [4]. I've warned one of the IPs yesterday [5] but it apparently they didn't care [6]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Addition of unsourced content/edit warring continues [7]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:46, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Al Mawakeb Schools (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IP Vandalism from 2 IP addresses (one warned more than 4 times, one previously blocked) and 1 mobile user. Edits include renaming it Prison in both English & Arabic, changing the location (to Earth or Space), and changing Private school to Torture school. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Homeland Party (United Kingdom) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Sockpuppetry and edit-warring. No talk page discussion. Onorem (talk) 12:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Multiple instances of edit warring consisting of deletion of referenced content by IPs and newly registered users. Technopat (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• John F. Kennedy Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:52, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Stjepan Lončar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Semi-protection requested to due to continuous disruption from numerous IP accounts. These accounts revert previous edits, resulting in the following - removal of additional information about debut for Lech Poznań & all information and categories related to playing for Lech's reserve team, questionable heading ('Later stage of career' instead of the player's current club), replacing en dashes with hyphens in Career statistics (contraty to WP:Footy standards). The following explanations were given by their author(s) - "removed excess information", "removed unnecessary bits" and "trimming". This behavior appears to be in line with other articles for Bosnian football players, e.g. Jasmin Burić and Haris Duljević. KibolLP (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Serial Experiments Lain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Batwheels (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Childish IP vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Template:Beyoncé (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's see if they can work it out on talk before blocks get issued. Moxy🍁 18:10, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Toledo War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥ 论 18:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• 2025 massacres of Syrian Alawites (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Repeated and various IP/new account vandalism on contentious current event Red Phoenician (talk) 20:21, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Stefan Dušan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of ip vandalism Theonewithreason (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Wilson Larimore House (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See talk page. Since 2022, IP users and COI users have been trying to remove all evidence of the building as a plantation with enslaved people, despite RS citations including the NRHP. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Nabi Ilyas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs edit it to be located in Israel. Huldra (talk) 23:20, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Gorilla (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nearly every IP edit has been vandalism since it was unprotected in February 24.55.33.220 (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Indian intervention in the Sri Lankan civil war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rampant disruption going on for days. NXcrypto Message 02:18, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Intellect (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPv6 editor. Skyerise (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• São Paulo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Semi-protection request due to recent high level of IP vandalism, one of which blanked the page. Because it is a level-3 vital article, this type of vandalism should definitely be protected against. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 03:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• News of the World (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA user is once again adding the same old lie about the film being a DirectTV exclusive when real reliable sources say otherwise. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• The Father (2020 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA user is once again adding the same old lie about the film being a DirectTV exclusive when real reliable sources say otherwise. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Druski (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Recent court complaint was just submitted and released, alleging inappropriate conduct with Diddy. Local Courts & Attorneys have not confirmed authenticity - requesting protection to reduce further vandalism of the unverified source. RavenM3 (talk) 05:18, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Nouman Ali Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was recently unprotected after having been protected numerous times. It is still plagued by newer or unregistered users attempting to remove unfavorable information about its subject. Snuish (talk) 05:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Talk:Skibidi Toilet (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediate resumption of LTA activities after previous protection expired. Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Guam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: No vandalism 2405:3800:8CF:555E:5433:B7FF:FEC9:3D4F (talk) 05:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Charles de Gaulle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 05:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Talk:Gaza genocide (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: WP:PP states: "Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption." The Gaza Genocide talk page, contrarily, is Extended-confirmed-protected and indefinitely! Hence, it is prima facie overprotected according to the obvious intent of WP:PP. Moreover, WP:PP asserts that talk pages should not be protected in such a way that discussion is limited to a privileged minority of editors, but that is precisely the case at present. I have been informed by an E-C editor that I have no business opining on the content of this article because I am not E-C. This violation of the spirit of WP:PP disenfanchises the majority of Wikipedia's editors. I request the protection of this talk page be lowered to semi-protected.

I have conversed with DanCase who instituted the protection, but he has refererred me back to the Arbitration Committee which made the original decision. Kenfree (talk) 12:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Due to considerable disruption, the arbitration committee made a decision long ago that all IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. If you wish to change that decision, you will need to ask the committee. This is done at WP:ARCA. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

@Kenfree: To link to the specific decisions, WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4#ARBPIA General Sanctions (which itself supersedes WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3#General Prohibition, where this was first introduced) and WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:35, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Declined * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• List of 2018 albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: None of the other lists of albums released in a year have extended confirmed protection. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Have you discussed this with the protecting administrator, that would be User:Muboshgu? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• Mark Carney (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Change Prime Minister to "Unelected Prime Minister who cannot have a mandate because he is also not an elected member of parliament." J1077 (talk) 23:16, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

I suggest you read up on the Westminster system and Canadian Parliamentary Rules before you make such a ridiculous claim. 2600:4040:521F:EF00:211E:1909:FF9A:82A (talk) 02:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

• C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [8]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

• Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 5 months. Walco1, feel free to apply after perm expires. I've noted one verifiability issue, and a few sentences that seem uncited (like in Bestwood Lodge). If your creations over the next months are fully cited, I'm happy to grant permanently. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:31, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

• GanzKnusper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

• AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

• AmateurHi$torian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

@Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

+1 Good quality and appropriately sourced articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

• MaplesyrupSushi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Great editor, with high quality articles.Has written 32 live articles. Xiphoid Vigour ⚔Duel⚔ 15:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• Hwqaksd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I have created 90 articles, of which 81 are above stub-class and none deleted (to my recollection).

I was previously denied autopatrolled permissions for not having enough articles that didn't go through AfC; I've since created 14 articles without utilizing it. Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• NaveenNkadalaveni (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I have created 65 articles which are live, I understand the Wikipedia notability and other standards. I do create the articles of great quality. Hence request you to kindly grant the autopatrolled right, as the articles which I have been created are in pending for review state from long time, which demotivates me from creating new articles. Now a days, I'm mostly creating articles on Indian Villages. I have an experience of 11 years in Wikipedia, My articles are featured in DYK and ITN section of Wikipedia main page. I have worked with some of the Wikipedia admins and gained the knowledge. Searching our article and finding our Wikipedia page in the first result kept me motivating to add new articles to Wikipedia. Thanks in Advance. —Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

@NaveenNkadalaveni: (Non-administrator comment) Please add your reason for requesting autopatrolled rights. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:44, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

• Miminity (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I've created 37 articles main JP-related articles. Seven including Huwie Ishizaki appeared in DYK. (Though, I only discovered DYK later in July), Huwie Ishizaki is both WP:GAN and on queue in DYK (will release tomorrow when I'm writing this). None of my articles are deleted all of them are well-sourced.

My earlier stuffs are a bit short (e.g. Shōgo Yasukawa, Yoshinobu Yamakawa) and the earlier pages I created are stubs (N56 highway (Philippines), Urdaneta–Dagupan Road). In total, 6 of my articles are stubs. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:41, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

• Mevoelo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

With over 45 live articles created, I believe that my experience on Wikipedia can positively contribute to patrol community. In addition, I believe that this right will also accord me more opportunity to grow. I hope i am given a chance. Thank you. Mevoelo (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Based on the XTools link in your nomination, you've had at least four of your creations deleted at AfD in the past six months for notability issues. That and your nomination statement leads me to believe that your work still requires scrutiny from new pages patrol. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

 Not done, per above. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

• Eiga-Kevin2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I came across this user while reviewing articles in NPP. They are an infrequent new article author, but have a clear understanding of notability and reliable sources, in addition to being a major contributor to several quality articles. A few sparse concerns about the use of copyrighted images were quickly corrected when notified, and they have been invited to NPP previously. Reconrabbit 18:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

• 36hourblock (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

36hourblock has created 106 articles in mainspace, none of which have been deleted. I have marked several of 36hourblock 's articles as reviewed through NPP; initially, I noticed some issues with NPOV, but since I discussed this issue with them, the creations have been more neutral in tone. I would grant AP personally, but I would like a second opinion. Please ping me if you find any issues. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

• Locust member (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Slightly below the suggested 25 creations, but this user has been very prolific at writing in the last few months. They appear to demonstrate solid understanding of notability, I saw no other issues while skimming through, and over half of their creations are GAs to boot. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 22 articles. — MusikBot ^talk 03:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Cactusismeout (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Confirmed alt, just in case I need to edit semi-protected pages.--Cactusismeout (talk) 09:37, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Confirmed. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Abo Yemen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello! I meet the basic guidelines for the permission and I think that I have a good history of RM participation and it would be nice to try and help out with something new. I don't have much to say in my head but feel free to ask questions! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• Michael Aurel (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I edit mostly on the topic of Greek mythology, where I quite frequently come across minor pages with problematic titles. These are the pages I've moved; I haven't received a complaint from an undiscussed move. My requested moves have generally been successful (the only exception I can think of was one where the RM itself was successful, but it was reverted after a discussion at the closer's talk). I've been to WP:RMTR a fair bit (45 edits), and am here after a mover from RMTR left a message on my talk suggesting that I ask for this permission, so that I don't need to continue making requests there. Michael Aurel (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 17:16, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Vellutis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot ^talk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

• Thorn6130 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

• AgerJoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoy 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• Xiphoid Vigour (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([10]). — MusikBot ^talk 09:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. I would like to be able to confirm these requests as I think that it would just be another way for me to be helpful. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• WormEater13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I have been a active contributor to Wikipedia for quite a few months now, actively editing and creating articles related to Texas politicians. I'm also well aware about the Wikipedia policy on vandalism. I see a lot of requests on articles that I edit miscellaneously in my free time, however I don't have the permission. WormEater13 (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([11]). — MusikBot ^talk 22:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

• Danoniinho (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm requesting Pending Changes Reviewer status so I can help speed up and decrease the number of pending changes to articles. I know the rules about vandalism, verifiability, editing guidelines, and everything else. Danoniinho (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• Paradoxodarap (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I would like to request **Pending Changes Reviewer** rights. I have been an active editor since December 2020, with **1,094 total edits** (945 live). In the past year, I have made **345 edits**, primarily contributing to content creation, sourcing, and maintenance. I have created **154 articles** (121 currently live), ensuring compliance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. I am familiar with **WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,** and other core policies. I aim to help review pending changes on semi-protected pages to ensure accuracy and reliability. Thank you for your time and consideration! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Zerogpt says it’s 88.76% Ai generated. — Cerium4B—Talk? • 17:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

@Paradoxodarap Did you use ChatGPT to generate this request? If so why? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 04:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Hi, @Cerium4B @Cactusisme Both of you are right on both counts, I had previously applied for a permission and was rejected, I thought perhaps I couldnt present myself better, so I took my account data and asked GPT to write this one. Yes, the request is GPT generated, Also YES, I have been at this for so long. So, thats why i used GPT. I can understand how this looks, but I had to try anyways :) bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 12:22, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Stranger43286 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi. I'm Stranger43286. I has made 1000+ edits and reverted many vandalism. I also known Wikipedia's core policies (NPOV, WP:V and more). Pending changes reviewer rights might be helpful for me. RealStranger43286 (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Your English has some errors. Are you sure that you should take this responsibility? — Cerium4B—Talk? • 14:09, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I'm sure that I should take this responsibility. My English may have some errors because English is not my first language. But I understand english. RealStranger43286 (talk) 03:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• HerBauhaus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I've been an active contributor to Wikipedia, focusing on improving article quality, maintaining neutrality, and adding reliable citations. I'm well versed in core policies (NPOV, Verifiability, NOR) and understand the importance of pending changes. As someone who values data integrity in open-access knowledge, I prioritize accuracy and well-sourced content. One of my objectives is to help keep Wikipedia factual and trustworthy. HerBauhaus (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

• Rasteem (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm patrolling PendingChanges and RecentChanges on a regular basis. I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policies including (Verifiability, NPOV, BLP, OR, and also VAND - NOTVAND) and this right would help me to combat vandalism. I'm willing to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Ʀasteem Talk 04:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

• TenshiSWR (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi, I'd like to request pending changes reviewer so that I can help out with the review backlog. I'm active both at CopyPatrol and in recent changes patrolling, and familiar with the relevant policies regarding reviewing pending changes (Copyvio, potential BLP issues, legal threats, personal attacks, and libel). Tenshi! (Talk page) 01:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 17:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• BarntToust (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I just think it'd be neat to take part in the process of reviewing pending changes! I have an understanding of good versus poor content, and gaining this right would be nice to exercise when I come across a needy page. BarntToust 01:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 17:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Twistedmath (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I request permission to the user right, “Pending Changes Reviewer” for the intent that all articles head onto a smooth path to featured article. I will take this as an opportunity to nurture my Wiki-Knowledge and become an even more experienced editor. I hope that with this permission, I will be able to encourage and support new comers in their edits. I also have read and have familiarized myself with many of Wikipedia’s policy’s along with dedicating a large part of my time fighting vandalism twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 04:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Coining (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• SportscarFan2004 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• Oostpulus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 198 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 09:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• E6400 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I am kindly requesting rollback permissions for myself, in order to revert vandalism using the Huggle tool. E6400 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi, I requested for this right a few weeks ago, which MusikBot will flag up. The reason I was declined was mainly because I had not met the 200 mainspace edit threshold needed for my application to go through. A concern was also raised about one of my edits, saying that I had jumped to conclusions about an editor a bit quickly and had gone too fast with the warnings. I am now trying to be better at using the warning system more fairly and helpfully and I hope that I have addressed this concern. Most of my edits on Wikipedia have been fighting against vandalism and with this tool, I will be able to fight it more efficiently. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot ^talk 17:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

If it helps, I'd like to vouch for ScrabbleTiles. They've proved to be a good user, and I doubt that they would misuse either of the requested permissions.(Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 16:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

• United Blasters (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm requesting rollback rights to enhance my ability to fight vandalism. I Would like to try out AntiVandal tool. I'm a Mobile user, so Rollback will be very useful for me. I'm active in recent changes, pending changes, and new pages patrol, and I understand rollback is for clear vandalism cases. I'll use it responsibly. Here is my Undo/Revert History : [13]

UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

• Cactusisme (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have made many reverts using undo and I use SWviewer/Twinkle to revert vandalism (see this to see my reverts). I understand the policies of rollback and have thoroughly read through the rollback policies and guidlines. I have experience with rollback on Meta and Simple English. I hope that I would receive the rights (permenant or for a probation period).— Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• WikiMentor01 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I usually manual revert edits and undo revisions, particularly in Nepal-related articles, where vandalism is more common. Having rollback rights would help me efficiently maintain the accuracy and quality of these pages. WikiMentor01 (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

• Swoonfed (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I've been editing on Wikipedia since May 2024, and often times see IP accounts or newly created accounts cause disruption, vandalism or spread misinformation across vital articles. I have to manually revert their edits most of the times. Since I have been working on improving and expanding a few high exposure articles, I believe rollback rights would give me a large boost in handling vandalism. Swoonfed ^(Ping) 14:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

• Ghent123 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Despite the fact that I took a somewhat lengthy Wikibreak, I've had over a month's experience of patrolling Recent Changes to combat vandalism. I have read WP:Rollback as well as have consistently notifying users of their reverted edits. I hope to use this tool so I can revert Vandalism more efficiently. With Thanks,  Ghent123  Communicate 06:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

• Galaxybeing (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'll like to request for rollback rights. I have started patrolling recent changes since this year to remove any problematic edits. Having this tool can make the reverting process easier since it saves time consumption and therefore limits the chances of any accidental misclicks. Thanks. Galaxybeing (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

• Raph Williams65 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hey, am requesting the rollback rights mainly for reverting vandalism or unconstructive edits as i've read and understood that one can use the rollback but for reverting vandalism. Thanks, Would be glad if granted. – Raphael ^(B//C) 02:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 189 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 22:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

• TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I want to request rollback right for me to counter the acts of vandalisms in Wikipedia. I have more than 200 mainspace edits, I have reviewed pending changes for more than a month, I never consciously participated in any edit wars and I try my best to notify the authors of edits reverted by me whenever possible. TrueMoriarty (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

• Xiphoid Vigour (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm requesting the rights to fight Vandalism and use the Anti-vandal tool. I was declined last time as I had accidentally mistaken a level 4 warning to be 4im. I have also recieved a barnstar for the recent changes patrolling. Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 09:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([14]). — MusikBot ^talk 09:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

• Ultraodan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi there! I have been patrolling Special:PendingChanges for over a month, I have over 1700 edits. I've read through WP:Rollback and fully understood it. I have Never been involved in an edit war, instead I've helped resolve some in the past. I have a very good record of informing editors on their talk pages when I have reverted their edits or declined their pending changes. This permission would help me fight against vandalism by just making the job easier and quicker to carry out. Ultraodan (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

• Narutolovehinata5 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I am a regular on WP:DYK and am interested in helping out with promoting preps to queues and pulling problematic hooks. I currently have thousands of edits to the Template userspace, largely in conjunction with DYK. It has been suggested that DYK regulars consider applying for template editor to help out with the queues and so I am making this request. To make things clear, I am at this time not planning to use the right for anything other than DYK-related purposes (meaning prep/queue work), so if the request is declined, I understand. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 16)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~55,000)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~11,000)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0?)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0?)

Comment: Should be fine based on extensive DYK experience. See also Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll/Archive 10 § Narutolovehinata5: July 26, 2018 endorsements based on DYK. – JensonSL (SilverLocust) 18:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Based on my long-term experience working with Narutolovehinata5 at DYK, I endorse their request. RoySmith (talk) 19:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 17:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• Cielquiparle (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Interested in helping move prep sets to queue at DYK. Have promoted 500+ hooks at DYK. Am very aware of the need to thoroughly review each and every article that is being featured on the main page, and to question hooks that don't look right or can't be verified properly. Am aware of the review procedures at WT:DYK and at WP:ERRORS. (DYK needs all hands on deck at the moment.) Cielquiparle (talk) 13:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 3)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~37,000)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~3,000)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0?)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0?)

Comment: Should be fine based on extensive DYK experience. See also comment by RoySmith. – JensonSL (SilverLocust) 18:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Based on my long-term experience working with Cielquiparle at DYK, I endorse their request. RoySmith (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 17:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)