• ... that Sophie Rain's recent "Playboy Mansion" requires "no silk robe-sporting old men"?
  • ALT1: ... that Sophie Rain's massive success on OnlyFans has been attributed to her "unconventional looks"?
  • ALT2: ... that OnlyFans is "not sunshine and rainbows 24/7", according to the platform's Sophie Rain?
  • ALT3: ... that Sophie Rain was recently described as being in an "OnlyFans arms race" with two other creators?
  • ALT4: ... that Sophie Rain went from living on food stamps to making $43,477,695.01 in a year on OnlyFans?
  • ALT5: ... that Sophie Rain advertises her OnlyFans account on her Christianity and virginity?
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Prosecutor
  • Comment: ... and if WP:DYKHOOKBLP wasn't a thing, I'd propose ALT6: ... that "the horniest man in America" sent Sophie Rain's OnlyFans account $4.7 million in a year?.

Launchballer 05:26, 21 February 2025 (UTC).

Overall: I've seen the subject in the news a bit lately. I find it extrodinary that there are so many simps willing to throw ridiculous amounts of money at content creators, but whatever floats your boat. Approve hook ALT4 which I think is a hell of a lot more interesting than references to Hugh Hefner in ALT0. Ps, for anyone looking for the supporting source it's this one TarnishedPath^talk 10:45, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• @Launchballer and TarnishedPath: The nomination has been pulled per the discussion at WT:DYK#Sophie Rain. Concerns were raised about the references used. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:37, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

(ec, from WT:DYK) New one on me regarding the Evening Standard, but I've cut everything except for an attributed opinion, which is also what Vice is solely used for. People is only being used for the claims that she goes to church and grew up on food stamps, neither of which I would describe as contentious (but the latter claim's also in the South China Morning Post and in this Riverfront Times piece). Complex is Complex Networks and has an editor-in-chief, according to Variety. Also, the number is also in this National World piece, which I was surprised to see people at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 465#NationalWorld.com sticking up for earlier this year. I'll take a closer look at Complex once I've eaten.--Launchballer 12:40, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

I trimmed Complex for everything other than "$10 a month", which isn't contentious, and People for everything other than $50 million (I don't think it's contentious to say that "person who made lots of money makes even more"). What else?--Launchballer 13:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

@RoySmith, putting aside your dislike for the content matter, are the changes which have been made sufficient? TarnishedPath^talk 02:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

We've got a big backlog of better material to run. I don't see that we need to go here. RoySmith (talk) 02:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

We currently have the smallest backlog we've had all year, and this meets all five of WP:DYKAIM.--Launchballer 16:24, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Personally, I'd prefer we don't run this kind of sensationalistic drek at all, but even if we do end up finding better sources and running this, please change "$43,477,695.01" to "$43 million" in the hook for style reasons. RoySmith (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

ALT4a: ... that Sophie Rain went from living on food stamps to making $43 million in a year on OnlyFans?--Launchballer 13:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

This is starting to ossify, so I posted at WP:RSN#Sophie Rain.--Launchballer 18:53, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Just archived and they were fine with what was there. New reviewer needed.--Launchballer 17:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)