![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image in infobox
Hi all, for the infobox image what should the best corse of action be. I feel that the most updated photo of Willis is not very good when compared with the other images available on commons. Any thoughts? Yedaman54 (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The image with the blurred background looks weird as the blurring goes right up to her face and makes her hair look funny. The most up to date image, while not perfect, is preferable. TarnishedPathtalk 00:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dude she looks like a gremlin in that photo. It also a large amount of motion blur on her hands. The other photo while yes having a blurred background has a clear photo of her face and quite frankly its a less ugly image. Yedaman54 (talk) 02:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like a gremlin is your subjective opinion. The blurring of the entire background in the older photo is jarring when all of a sudden her face is in focus. TarnishedPathtalk 03:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Your opinions of the blurring is also subjective. Look I get you like the photo cause you uploaded it but we need some other opinions on this. Yedaman54 (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like a gremlin is your subjective opinion. The blurring of the entire background in the older photo is jarring when all of a sudden her face is in focus. TarnishedPathtalk 03:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dude she looks like a gremlin in that photo. It also a large amount of motion blur on her hands. The other photo while yes having a blurred background has a clear photo of her face and quite frankly its a less ugly image. Yedaman54 (talk) 02:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly neither photo is that great. Perhaps there's an official portrait that we can use under Fair Use or something? Paris1127 (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that neither photo is perfect. Unfortunately we can't do Fair Use of photos that are under copyright when we have alternative photos available to use that have free use. In this circumstance it's a decision of which of the imperfect photo is better. TarnishedPathtalk 01:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- How about no photo until a better one is uploaded? Yedaman54 (talk) 08:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Any photo is better than none. I think the questions comes down to which is the best of the two imperfect photo. TarnishedPathtalk 09:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- How about no photo until a better one is uploaded? Yedaman54 (talk) 08:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that neither photo is perfect. Unfortunately we can't do Fair Use of photos that are under copyright when we have alternative photos available to use that have free use. In this circumstance it's a decision of which of the imperfect photo is better. TarnishedPathtalk 01:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Fani REMOVED from case
Appeals Court has removed Fani Willis from the Trump Georgia case
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5048455-fani-willis-disqualified-trump-georgia/
Friedbyrd (talk) 15:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Article Intro
Is there really any objection to adding one sentence to the lead about her being tossed off the Trump case for conflict of interest? MasterBlasterofBarterTown (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose something a change to the second paragraph here.
- Something better than what you last edited into the article "She was later dismissed from this case over concerns of impropriety and conflict of interest."
- Stating that she was removed from the case for a conflict of interest isn't good enough because it lacks context. TarnishedPathtalk 05:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Better how? All the context is in the body of the article. She was tossed because of a conflict of interest, its really not that complicated. MasterBlasterofBarterTown (talk) 18:23, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm okay with one sentence in the lead to discuss her removal. The edit I objected to had doubled the size of the lead. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Better how? All the context is in the body of the article. She was tossed because of a conflict of interest, its really not that complicated. MasterBlasterofBarterTown (talk) 18:23, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.