The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn per below. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Gerald Rashard Everett → Gerald Everett  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Rashard seems to be the wrong middle name. PFR has Rashad. Red Director (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There doesn't seem to be a reference online to any middle name ("Rashad", "Rashard", or anything else), so I performed this edit since the inclusion of any middle name could be a WP:BLP issue. In fact, if Gerald Rashad Everett exists (and, in fact it does, and it was created by this RfD's nominator), it should probably be deleted as well. Steel1943 (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Steel1943: People often use Pro Football Reference as a source for names, which includes "Rashad" (link).

  Meanhwile, the Los Angeles Rams (he played 4 seasons for them and was drafted by them) list his middle name as "Rashard" (link). Scroll down and click read more, it's at the very bottom of his bio under the personal section. This media guide, from the Rams for the 2019 season, uses "Rashard" as well on page 94.

  The South Alabama Jaguars (who he played college football for) list his name as "Gerald Rashard Everett" as well (link).

  The Los Angeles Chargers, who he played for two seasons for, list his middle name as "Rashard" (link) in their 2023 media guide (page 133).

  His middle name is not listed in the Bears' 2024 media guide (page 142).

  So that makes three of his past teams (two pro, one college) stating his middle name is "Rashard" and not "Rasha". Pinging @Red Director. I think maybe PFR got it wrong on this one. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, could have very have been a typo or who knows. I vote to remove both because this seems to be a rare case. If we do keep one, I vote 'Rashard'. Trying to do a good thing on my side ended up opening up a mountain lol. @Hey man im josh Red Director (talk) 14:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Based on the number of sources, I'm thinking keep would be the appropriate result. PFR does get it wrong occasionally, and I'll reach out to them about this (I sometimes end up sending them corrections based on research I'm doing). Hey man im josh (talk) 14:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Submitted a correction with the relevant sources. They're often pretty quick to respond for straight forward issues like this. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks Josh. Red Director (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I did have a ref in the article for his middle name (Rams bio) but someone accidentally removed it. :) ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You could have reverted me and I would have taken no offense lol. I was cleaning up the lead, or at least I thought I was because of how references are viewed in the lead. We will get these all squared away one day hopefully. The main issue is that trolls can place any middle name in those full names and some stick. This is not the case on this one though. @WikiOriginal-9 Red Director (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Even though the page is on my watchlist, I didn't notice until just now, lol. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I only put the ref in the lead on this one because this article has a history of random users (possibly trolls) adding "Geovanni" and "Geanni" to the lead. Also, if the ref for his middle name is removed from the lead, it should be placed in the body ("Gerald Rashard Everett was born on". ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral per the above discussion, now that validating the correct name has been resolved and the misspelling apparently appears in sources (but it's not enough for me to change to "keep" since I'm weary about BLP misspellings, and I'm not familiar with the target subject). Steel1943 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Director: Am I interpreting this discussion right to assume you are considering withdrawing this? Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That is fine on my side. Feel free to to delete 'Rashad'. We can keep 'Rashard'. Red Director (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Director: Okay, I'll get this closed out. If the other redirect needs to be deleted, a new discussion may need to be started (probably with referencing this discussion.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. The redirect is now mentioned, and use of ＃ is standard as a replacement for titles which should have hashtags. All concerns from editors !voting delete have been resolved. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• ＃saveminecraft → Minecraft#saveminecraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No discussion of such a hashtag at the target article. People who search for this hashtag will not know the context of what the hashtag is referring to. The anchor is invisible to readers who might not know why they got warped halfway down the page, and without a direct mention of such a hashtag for their eyeballs to latch onto, the context is guesswork as it stands. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:14, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT, the hashtag character used (＃) is not in English keyboards. If the phrase gets mentioned in the target article eventually, Saveminecraft can be created, and ... wait, it already exists? Anyways, if it's mentioned, then a {{Technical reasons}} and/or {{Correct title}} hatnote may need to be added somewhere. (Well, 2 nominations incoming ...) Steel1943 (talk) 22:09, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  ...Actually, make that only 1 for Saveminecraft. I was considering nominating almost all the redirects listed here (pages that begin with "＃"), but then decided to take a pause after discovering Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 26#＃willpower, in addition to noticing that typing "#" (standard hashtag/pound sign on English keyboards) in Wikipedia's search bar brings up pages/redirects that begin with "＃" (the character not in English keyboards which this nominated redirect begins with). @Utopes: Pinging you since we had a related WP:MIXEDSCRIPT discussion in the past. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  What exactly do you mean by "the hashtag character used (#) is not in English keyboards"? It's on my keyboard, and I'm typing in English. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The above message was clear about two different characters being involved. One of which is on English keyboards (the one you're posting) and the other is not (the one in this redirect). "＃" is not on English keyboards, because it represents an entirely different symbol. The link left by Steel indicates that "＃" is not a number sign, but a sharp (music), which is why an article title can start with it. If it was a regular number sign, it would be impossible, as starting an article with a regular number-sign is disallowed by mediawiki. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Now neutral per "meh". Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Mention was removed as textbook recentism along with the 1984 reference, although 1984 was added back later. Jay 💬 07:33, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reopening and relisting per discussion on my talk page: Special:PermanentLink/1273206899#Saveminecraft_deletions
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 16:47, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless a mention can be added. Note that WP:MIXEDSCRIPT does not apply here since the fullwidth # is used as a workaround for WP:NCHASHTAG. You can find many other redirects like that in Category:Redirects from hashtags. Nickps (talk) 17:52, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added mention. Jay 💬 09:25, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The rationale was that the term is not mentioned at the target article but now it is mentioned, and I agree with it being mentioned. It was explained above that WP:MIXEDSCRIPT should not be held to apply because allowing for this symbol is an accepted technical workaround and such redirects are one type of a redirect from hashtag, as explained in Template:R from hashtag/doc#Usage. (The hashtag can either be excluded or included using replacement symbols.)—Alalch E. 15:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Changing to keep now that a mention was added per my earlier comment. Nickps (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The China Project → China–Cornell–Oxford Project  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This is the verbatim name an apparently now-defunct media company. I'm unsure whether or not the company meets GNG, but even if it doesn't, it still seems like WP:REDYES. Anyone searching this exact phrase, particularly with this exact capitalisation, is almost certainly looking for the company, and will only be confused by the target. — Anonymous 21:48, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily closed. Retargeted as an ordinary editorial action per my comment below. (non-admin closure) —Alalch E. 15:12, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Kill Two Birds with One Stone → One Stone and Two Birds  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The famous idiom is not mentioned at the target (less known Taiwanese film) The film's title is exactly the Chinese idiom translated literally as "one stone, two birds" which is the Chinese counterpart to "kill two birds with one stone", but that's now how the film's title has been translated in our article and not how it has been translated in this English-language Taiwanese source. Considering whether Idiom would be a suitable redirect target, I conclude that it is not, because while it mentions this expression as an example in a particular context, it does not even explain what it means, so this would not be helpful to a reader. —Alalch E. 19:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: We also have an article titled Two Birds, One Stone about a hip hop song. Honestly, I'm surprised we do not have an article about the famous idiom. May be an WP:XY issue since the article about the idiom doesn't seem to exist. Steel1943 (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: I'm not sure if there's enough coverage for an article. There's nice coverage at https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2013/08/bird-play.html.

I've found a suitable target: English-language idioms and will retarget. Please reopen this RfD if further discussion is needed. —Alalch E. 15:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:14, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The way all good men go → Death  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 19:58, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it was created after an IP editor used the phrase as a redlink but isn't really a plausible search term and is linked from no other place, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Universo Paralello → Bahia#Universo Paralello  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Universo Paralello is a music festival in Bahia. There used to be content about it in the target article, added originally in Special:Diff/1179632199, in the aftermath of the Re'im music festival massacre (the music festival in Israel whose attendees were massacred was affiliated with the larger Brazilian Universo Paralello festival). This addition to the Bahia article was completely pointless and has since been undone, and so there is no mention of "Universo Paralello" at the target, and there's no suitable alternative target. —Alalch E. 19:18, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• to my surprise, it is spelled like that (the correct spelling would be "paralelo(a)", and "parallelo" doesn't seem to be a word), and it seems to have a chance of being notable, so return to red, essentially per nom. also to my surprise, there's also no article about it on wp-pt consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 13:16, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Bar-e-Sagheer → Indian subcontinent  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Name not mentioned at target. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:25, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be the name in the Hindustani language (Hindi: बर्र-ए-सग़ीर, Urdu: برّ صَغِیر). This was a short-lived article created earlier today that was redirected after a CSD nominatio per A10. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete I'm hesitant to delete this redirect if it is indeed a valid name for the region as suggested by LaundryPizza03. OTOH, I can't find a source to verify this claim at the moment in order to add a mention to the article. I'm leaning towards deletion at the moment as a result. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• White Gold (musician) → Got Milk?#Fictional characters depicted in ads  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The section in which this character was mention was removed in 2010 as excessive (the character's mention was also unsourced anyway). I cannot find any other mention of this subject. Jalen Barks (Woof) 17:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 17:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Genesis (2008) → Genesis (2009)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Looks like someone's crystal ball was faulty. No need to keep this a decade and a half later. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:49, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This was actually a page move turned into a redirect. LarryL33k (Contribz) 23:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:42, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• V For Vengence → V for Vendetta (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Per WP:R#DELETE, very obscure synonym, borne from an editor misremembering the film's title. Is wholly unhelpful for WP:R#Keep. MimirIsSmart (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably a closer match for "V" Is for Vengeance that the film. But it's spelled wrong too, so just delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 5217 → Hagavik  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Lots of things are numbered 5217 (a gene, a watch model, a multimeter, various forms, etc). This area isn't the primary topic and the zip code is an unlikely search term. Rusalkii (talk) 02:06, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough contents for a disambiguation page; the only other title containing the number is a minor planet redirect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:33, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Post codes are wholly unfit as redirects. Geschichte (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of most expensive cities for expatriate employees. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The Most Expensive City In The World For Expats → Luanda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nominating List of most expensive cities for expatriate employees. Redirect to Luanda reflects data from 2018/2019 source and is not current. Rather than constantly updating the redirect, there's already a list article that covers this. Lukeh486 (talk) 01:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of most expensive cities for expatriate employees per nom. In my humble opinion, redirects should never be created for statistical items that are subject to frequent change, such as "the busiest ____" or "the most expensive ____"; such redirects are too difficult to police, so they should only target the list where the items are found. Carguychris (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).