The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Electronic music festivals in The Netherlands → Category:Electronic music festivals in the Netherlands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Soft redirect category, left over after the category was renamed to the correct Category:Electronic music festivals in the Netherlands. I don't see the need to keep this one, it's unlikely people will search for this specific capitalisation. Or is it normal to have category redirects from alternative capitalisations? Robofish (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(I reviewed the guidance at WP:Category redirects that should be kept, and I don't think this qualifies.) Robofish (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There are no uses or links to this redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep, some people might mistakenly capitalize the T in "the," but I don't know about it with there being no links to the redirect. Regards, SONIC678 05:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Any search will find a match to the correct article irrespective of the capitalization. Keeping it will only legitimize the incorrect capitalization if used as a link in articles. Senator2029 “Talk” 10:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Tally Hall (band)#Post-Good & Evil. Now mentioned at target. (non-admin closure) buidhe 09:56, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• See how I circle → Tally Hall (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not listed at the target article —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. See how I circle, also known as Labyrinth, is the title song from the 2020 album by Miracle Musical. They are a new band formed by the members of Tally Hall. 53zodiac (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The previous editor's comments may be entirely true, but without edits to the article there is no explanation about why a searcher has landed there. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Change the redirect to the relevant section Tally Hall (band)#Post-Good & Evil. 53zodiac (talk) 18:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Refine - I agree that this should go to 'Tally Hall (band)#Post-Good & Evil'. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine following edit to article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Refine to Tally Hall (band)#Post-Good & Evil 53zodiac (talk) 09:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ryan Lindsay (artist) → Ryan Tyler  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

While this is Ryan Tyler's birth first and middle name, I can't find any evidence that he has ever been known by this name. The disambiguator is also not ideal for a country singer. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Enwiki has nothing about an artist called Ryan Lindsay. There is the husband of John Ross Palmer but the article doesn't say he's an artist and doesn't establish notability. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Due to its uncertain meaning and high potential for inaccurate targeting. Senator2029 “Talk” 10:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. 14 years! Don't think we list redirects at WP:HOAXLIST but still! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Kiwistan → New Zealand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I can barely find any usage of this phrase online; WP:MADEUP? TheAwesomeHwyh 20:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Kiwite – per nom. Definitely WP:MADEUP on less than one day. --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 08:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Just a note that in my more cynical moments, that is how I refer to my home country. Schwede66 09:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unencyclopedic term with no mention in Enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Obscure neologism, barely any pageviews. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete completely unnecessary. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. To be fair, it was the only good part of that film ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I Love You 3000 → Avengers: Endgame  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. I recognize that this is a meme associated with the film, but without any mention at the target I don't see how this redirect is useful. I would suggest deletion unless a due mention can be added. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not mentioned at the target article, Tony Stark (Marvel Cinematic Universe), or Morgan Stark.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 21:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Great Pyramid of Ceres → Ahuna Mons  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

In line with the original page move, this should probably be deleted to keep it from popping up in the search bar as it is misleading and not mentioned in the target. I came across this in a move discussion over Great Pyramid. All relevant history is captured in existing article. -- 2pou (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I'd say it's a non-useful redirect. Retaining it might serve to perpetuate this silly terminology. WolfmanSF (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Provided justifications are reasonable, withdrawing nomination. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• MOS:Dumb quotes → Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Quotation characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of dumb in the target, I'm honestly mystified as to what was intended here. Delete unless a justification can be provided? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• This seems to be in reference to the phrase smart quotes: our manual of style is basically saying 'Don't use smart quotes'. – Uanfala (talk) 20:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• It's the creating editor's script (User:DemonDays64/Scripts/Dumb quotes). — J947 ^[cont] 20:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• It's because the rule is to use, instead of "smart" quotes (“”), "dumb" quotes (""). I made it so I could more easily link to the guidelines. DemonDays64 (talk) 21:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was point both to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Offensive images. (non-admin closure) feminist | wear a mask 04:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Offensive image → Wikipedia:Censorship  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Wikipedia:Offensive images → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Offensive images  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Requesting help from the community in deciding on the best target for these. The first one has been pointing to the dab page Wikipedia:Censorship since 2006 (having briefly oscillated between this target and the page on meta m:Censorship). The plural form targeted the same meta page 2005–2006, was then repointed to MediaWiki:Bad image list in 2006 and then retargeted again in 2014 to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Offensive images. Pings to the most recently involved editors: Ardric47, Jarble, CesarB, Korg. – Uanfala (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to 2nd. These should clearly both go to the same place. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget both to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Offensive images as most specific and closely related target. --Spasemunki (talk) 09:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sovietization of Poland → Soviet invasion of Poland  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Ambiguous search term, could also refer to the establishment of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Poland, the Provisional Government of National Unity, or the Polish People's Republic. Most Scholar search results seem to use "sovietization" (or at least, sovietization in the context of Eastern Bloc states) to refer to the 1945–1956 period. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete ambiguous term. Probably too vague to be an article. Soviet influence in Poland doesn't exist (yet) and Poland–Russia relations#Soviet Union doesn't seem to be a suitable target, as it is underdeveloped and does not mention the developments above. buidhe 08:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Austro-Hungarian Empire (Romania) → Romania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Romania was never part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Super Ψ Dro 18:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Although parts of modern Romania were within the Austro-Hungarian Empire, this redirect is misleading and confusing. It suggests that all of it was, and that was never true. We don't have redirects from e.g. Austro-Hungarian Empire (Bohemia) or Austro-Hungarian Empire (Moravia), which were wholly within that Empire, nor should we. Narky Blert (talk) 18:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. I could see Austro-Hungarian Empire (Bohemia) as being a useful redirect to Bohemia under Habsburg rule or similar, but that article does not exist. buidhe 08:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Black ppl → Black people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Blk ppl → Black people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Black Ppl → Black people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Wht ppl → White people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• White Ppl → White people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• White ppl → White people  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely. TheAwesomeHwyh 15:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Dlt. We don't need redirects from slangy Internet abbreviations to major topics. Note also the possible confusion with PPL (gene), which like most genes may have different allele frequencies in different populations. Narky Blert (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As above. Any confusion can be solved with a simple search. In addition, nobody would reasonably expect an encyclopedia entry to use a slangy abbreviation. Valkyrino (talk) 06:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 0bama → Barack Obama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely misspelling (the o is replaced with a zero here). TheAwesomeHwyh 15:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unlikely misspelling. Polyamorph (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Close to WP:G10. I've seen this meme several times before, in Yahoo! Answers Politics section, a notorious trollfest. The zero is a deliberate insult. Narky Blert (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• SPEEDY DELETE and Salt per WP:G10 as an attack. Yes, there's a misspelling, but it immediately jumped out more as deliberate Zero to me before I even saw that it's used as Narky Blert pointed out. -2pou (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delet3 as unlikely misspelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment since it looks like my speedy suggestion is ineligible given a prior RfD, but it seems worth mentioning that after looking at the creator's talk page, this editor had a history of creating G10 deleted pages that led to a block. The editor has since been unblocked and apologized, admitting that several redirects were things that the editor didn't like, and I think this one falls in that category. -2pou (talk) 07:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• K##p per the earlier RfD. --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete Whether or not this is an attack page, we have precedent at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_29#Oxygen_redirects (for 0xygen → Oxygen) and Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_16#0wnership_→_Total_cost_of_ownership that redirects with 0 for o are implausible. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, unambiguously refers to its target and is helpful. RNEUTRAL applies. — J947 ^[cont] 19:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the nominator's parenthetical statement. If you have to explain that 0bama is not Obama, it's a likely source of confusion. See my comments at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 2#0ld English, as well. Nyttend backup (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  It shouldn't just be kept for the convenience of people who participate at RFD. Peter James (talk) 20:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep As I stated in Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_April_26#0bama. WP:CHEAP.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nothing has changed since the last discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 20:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, seems plausible enough. A person with poor eyesight can clearly mistake the "0" with a capital "O". CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, plus the O and 0 keys are adjacent to each other on a keyboard, which doesn't help matters. Regards, SONIC678 05:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; similar redirects were deleted and there is no reason that this should be an exception. Peter James (talk) 20:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a horrible argument. I can just as well say that similar redirects were kept and there is no reason that this should be an exception. — J947 ^[cont] 00:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A mistake commonly made, e.g. [1]. feminist | wear a mask 04:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Romaminority in Romania → Romani people in Romania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A basically useless misspell (0 views in the last 30 days). Super Ψ Dro 15:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Deleteasunambiguouslycreatedinerror. Narky Blert (talk) 17:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete useless. buidhe 08:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per above. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Giant Sherpha → Raiders of the Lost Ark  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Minor character too minor to be mentioned in either the target article or List of Indiana Jones characters. I don't believe this name is even given to him during the actual action of the film. See the discussions for Ratty Nepalese and Mean Mongolian for similar nominations. Hog Farm (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. We really do not need redirects from or DAB page mentions of every minor character in every book or film ever written or made; nor indeed mentions of them in the relevant articles. BTW, is Sherpha a misspelling of "Sherpa"? Narky Blert (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Mean Mongolian → Raiders of the Lost Ark  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, very minor character. I believe he's only ever named in the credits. Not mentioned here, and shouldn't be. Hog Farm (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 17:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Nonsense or complete sentences → Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Pointless cross-namespace redirect, ruins the joke on the target page. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:XNR. It's linked in the current target, making it a cross-namespace WP:SELFREDIRECT. Narky Blert (talk) 11:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I suspect that "nonsense and complete sentences" was a redlink in the article to prove the point, and somebody thought it was necessary to make it a bluelink. Hog Farm (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per others. --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 15:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as harmful. — J947 ^[cont] 23:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why do you think it's harmful? TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @TheDiaperPinez37: If anyone searches this up they are almost certainly not looking for a subplot of an obscure humourous essay that no one but the occasional Wikipedian knows. — J947 ^[cont] 21:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • So you think that not many people even know about the humorous side of Wikipedia? TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 01:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • @TheDiaperPinez37: Look. When a reader searches this up wanting to find their way to a valid topic they find an extremely obscure in-joke that they are going to be completely puzzled about for no reason whatsoever than one editor's random selfish desire. Do you want that to happen? — J947 ^[cont] 01:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Question is, WHY would anyone want to search it in the first place? It was made exclusively to be accessible from the humorous page so that when someone would click it they wouldn't end up at a dead end. TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
            • People search for weird things. Plus, it defeats the purpose of the point to have this link be blue; the point is that in the sentence Always link red links, especially with nonsense or complete sentences. the link should be red. This is becoming ridiculous. — J947 ^[cont] 03:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
              • You know though, I can just use the "coloredlink" template to make it be red as if it was a real redlink. Like this: Nonsense or complete sentences TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 12:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
                • The whole point is you click on it and it goes nowhere. Please stop this disruption. — J947 ^[cont] 00:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
                  • OK! TheDiaperPinez37 (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Trance (2019 film) → Trance (2020 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Did not release in 2019. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Has incoming links and hundreds of hits per day. I see no harm. Station1 (talk) 05:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Station1 – this isn't detrimentally confusing to anyone and is helping huge numbers of people. — J947 ^[cont] 05:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and tag as {{R from incorrect name}}. I haven't checked the sources, but on the face of the article I wouldn't be at all surprised if some give the wrong year. No real possibility of confusion with other films called Trance, except for the obscure Austrian one with no article in either English or German WP. Narky Blert (talk) 07:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - A ton of views a day, deleting this will be detrimental. Hog Farm (talk) 15:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Note that per WP:R#DELETE criterion 10, a vote to "create an article" is equivalent to a vote for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Social recession → Recession  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"Social recession" is a real, if very recent thing; see, e.g., https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/america-faces-social-recession/608548/. It is not the same thing as a recession, nor is it mentioned in the recession article. Dan Bloch (talk) 02:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom to encourage article creation. Narky Blert (talk) 11:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert into an article using information from that source and anything else suitabe. Regards, SONIC678 14:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sonic678: I don't think this !vote is helpful. I recognise that an article could be created, but it seems you're not going to create it, are I think it's unreasonable to expect a closer to create one. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  OK. Sorry about that. Regards, SONIC678 14:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:REDLINK or convert into an article. Here are some more sources: [2][3][4][5]. buidhe 08:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to encourage article creation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Intternnett → Internet  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Whyy woulld anyonne ssearch thiis typpo? TheAwesomeHwyh 02:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; harmless and useless to delete per RHARMFUL. This nomination accomplishes nothing. — J947 ^[cont] 02:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Dellette perr nomm. Impllausiblle reddirectt. --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Implausible triple misspelling and possible confusion with inter alia interment and internment. Narky Blert (talk) 07:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete unlikely misspelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Implausible redirect. I do not see this as a useful redirect at all. - Dyork (talk) 01:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Whyy indeed. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Snnow ddellette 5/6 delete !votes in <48 hours. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• New+Zealand → New Zealand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely+redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 02:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; harmless and useless to delete per RHARMFUL. This nomination accomplishes nothing. — J947 ^[cont] 02:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, nice pageviews and the redirect is thus useful. — J947 ^[cont] 02:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per+nom. Implausible+redirect. --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • And how does one's view of implausibility matter? — J947 ^[cont] 05:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Implausible misspelling, unnecessary clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 07:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Whoever actually got to New Zealand by using this redirect needs to get a new space bar or keyboard. Anyway, it's a pointless redirect and people would probably just go to this redirect instead. Kori (@) 01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not pointless; the pageviews demonstrate that. There is nothing to be gained by deleting this redirect – other than annoying readers for no reason whatsoever. — J947 ^[cont] 04:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @J947: Can you suggest how those pageviews arise? Is there some sort of automated process that creates "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New+Zealand" ? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Probably from some copying of URLs and pasting into the URL bar incorrectly. Anyhow – the redirect is helpful and harmless, thus we shouldn't delete it. — J947 ^[cont] 19:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Using + separators in URIs instead of spaces is a common method of avoiding the ugly %20 encoding so its not implausible and page views show it is actually used. So deletion would be harmful and not bring any benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 20:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Thryduulf. I don't support mass creation of this sort of thing, but it's pretty standard for + to show up in a url rather than a space. It's supposed to be just as part of a form parameter (see these two stack overflow questions: [6] [7]) but in historical practice pops up elsewhere, especially when coming from search urls. No harm, potentially helpful, no need to delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Civitates Foederatae Americae → United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Why would anybody search for this in Latin? TheAwesomeHwyh 01:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RFFL. No real connection between the United States and the Latin language. Hog Farm (talk) 02:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Unlike the United Kingdom, English is not a de jure official language in the United States. Therefore, the name of the country should be translated to many languages, even in Bengali (মার্কিন যুক্তরাষ্ট্র). --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RLOTE. Note that in Latin, the three words could validly be arranged in any of the six possible orders. Narky Blert (talk) 07:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Redirect is absurd, users would simply translate a title and find the article. It is doubtful that anyone would type it in Latin. Kori (@) 01:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:RFFL. buidhe 08:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Reply - The reason for its creation isn't because someone might type it in, but to correctly link within the encyclopedia. The term was already listed on the disambiguation page CFA and linked to the United States article. Senator2029 “Talk” 04:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• THE AMERICAN UNITED STATES → United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely term in all caps. TheAwesomeHwyh 01:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; harmless and useless to delete per RHARMFUL. This nomination accomplishes nothing. Fair pageviews. — J947 ^[cont] 02:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unlikely search term in several ways. Narky Blert (talk) 07:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This redirect actually receives more pageviews than the correctly capitalized, WP:THE-free American United States. From July 2015 to March 2020, this redirect received 707 pageviews, American United States received 427, and 73831561 for the target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - It's a stretch, but it's somewhat plausible, and the capitalization is consistent throughout. Hog Farm (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per pageviews. I can't imagine why people are more likely to type this than to type American United States, but apparently they are. Nyttend backup (talk) 20:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RCAPS. Since The American United States didn't exist before I just created it, this redirect catches all usage that is not caps sensitive. Moving forward, that problem has now been resolved by funneling usage through the correct redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per pageviews; though it does seem implausible, in my opinion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; now "745 pageviews (0/day)" Zero per day isn't enough to keep unless it's a valid alternative name or something. Peter James (talk) 20:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE PER TAVIX, the previous pageview count is not real. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RCAPS. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Dark and Bloody Ground → Kentucky  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Appears to be the name of a book about the history of Kentucky and a film set in Kentucky, so the less-common state nickname isn't the only potential usage. WP:REDLINK might apply for the book. Hog Farm (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep This phrase is used in a lot of older works about Kentucky and was a popular folk etymology of its name that isn't currently discussed in the article, but probably should be. If an article on a book or movie appears in the future, it's already covered by existing policy. --Spasemunki (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Until it is mentioned in the target, with a source, it fails WP:V. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Eating babies → A Modest Proposal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unfortunately, this is not the only potential meaning of this - Human cannibalism is another. Probably better off with deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 00:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I've never heard this term used of Swift's pamphlet. Infant cannibalism is not exclusive to humans. Narky Blert (talk) 07:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This redirect may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, disturbing and unnecessary. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.