The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  20:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Epitonic Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable sources regarding this record label, or any signed artists that might suggest notability under N:MUSIC #5. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: fails WP:ORGDEPTH. Article created in 2005 by Warpozio, who is still active on Wikipedia. Label specialises in releasing exclusive material in digital format only, mostly the "Epitonic Saki Sessions" in which bands are recorded live in the Saki record store which occupies the same building as the record label, and then released for free download or streaming from the Epitonic website [1]. Although many notable artists have recorded for the Saki Sessions (Superchunk, Angel Olsen, Foxygen, the Handsome Family and many more), the exclusive and free nature of these releases means that none of them are notable. I can only find four full releases on the label, the most notable of which is an EP by Girls Against Boys. Richard3120 (talk) 22:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Epitonic, which has had some coverage as a website, but I agree with the above that the label does not appear notable enough on its own to warrant a standalone article.  gongshow  talk  02:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- the article literally consists of one sentence; A7 material. No need for a redirect as it's unlikely to be a valid search term. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.