The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013–14 Hyde F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Season article for a club outside of The Football League that's not notable in my opinion. Previous consensus backs this up. JMHamo (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and previous consensus here and here, amongst many others. If it's not a team in a fully-pro league (i.e. outside of the Football League in England) then it does not merit a season article. GiantSnowman 21:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per GS, current consensus seems to have changed and Conference National is no longer thought notable enough to justify a season article for a club. Fenix down (talk) 16:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- As this is only a Confernece North team, we should not be having season articles on it. The line should be drawn at League division II. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Correction: Hyde are playing in the Conference Premier (fifth tier) in the 2013–14 season. And could you clarify what division you are referring to by 'League division II'? Mattythewhite (talk) 23:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the nominator believes season-articles for clubs playing below the fourth tier are not notable, while I think the cut-off point is the fifth tier. Fortunately, this article is about a club that plays at the sixth' tier, so it can easily be deleted. Mentoz86 (talk) 23:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Season articles should only be allowed for clubs in fully pro leagues. Number 57 23:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.