Hi Nutriiguy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 11:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nic Adams (entrepreneur), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 11:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I noticed you reverted my notification about your sandbox edits on here. However, after doing so (which is an acknowledgement that you have read the notice), you have continued your disruptive editing pattern. If this continues, you may be blocked from editing. Jdcomix (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just collect my phone, it was some wondering how Wikipedia works. But I have stop him from disruptive edition. Thanks 🙏 Nutriiguy (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerome Murphy-O'Connor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shmuel Zakai, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked your WP:EXTENDED status, as half of your edits appeared to be gaming EC via tiny sandbox edits. Once you've made 500 useful edits, you are free to request extended confirmed status. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning sir, not half of my edit is gaming EC. Based on what I checked it's only 100 edition that was made by one friend who was thinking on how Wikipedia works. I left my office, he ended up trying to write rubbish and be cleaning them. Now, how can I request WP:EXTENDED? Nutriiguy (talk) 16:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for persistent, willful violations of the ARBECR, both before becoming extendedconfirmed and after having it revoked for PGAMING, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Per WP:CT/A-I § Appeals only to ArbCom, this block may only be appealed to the Arbitration Committee for its first year. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to [[WP:ARCA]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}.  After one year, this block may be appealed through the normal unblocking procedures.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 17:49, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

To be clear, this primarily concerns your edits to Avi Benayahu, Yeshayahu Gavish, and Uri Gordon (Zionist), although there might be more violations I didn't notice, as I haven't checked each and every one of your edits. There is also the more general issue of your edits remaining often promotional and full of AI slop. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 18:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]