Please do not remove tags from an article without first reading what its purpose is. The point of the netrality tag is to draw editor's attention to problems with the article, and encourage discussion about it. Simply reverting it will not help and is disruptive.

Please read what it says here. Conditions for removing it have not been met. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:13, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mars2052 – you have again removed the tag on the Tiffany Pollard article regarding concerns about neutrality and have reverted some of my recent attempts to make the article more neutral, reintroducing some puffery which (in my view) is not in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. I agree with Escape Orbit that the tag should not have been removed. The tag should remain at the top of the article until a consensus is reached that the concerns about neutrality have been addressed. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot demand that changes to the article require consensus, while simultaneously announcing that you will not engage in any further discussion. How is consensus to be reached without discussion? There is no consensus for what you have added to this article over the last couple of months, and the problems with it have been explained to you. You need to rxplain why talking up events in the article is acceptable tone for an encyclopedia, neutral and not expressions of opinion. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 13:44, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mars2052,

Unless you come discuss your editing decisions at ANI, it looks like you might be page blocked from working on your favorite article. Please come and participate. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 13:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To reviewing admins; this block is based solely on on-wiki information, but the ticket number in the log provided additional context that the provider felt unwise to give here. 331dot (talk) 14:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]