A page you started (Martin Válovčan) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Martin Válovčan, IQual!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Could do with some expansion. Otherwise, good job!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

MFK Dukla Banská Bystrica

Ahoj, vsimol som si ze si davnejsie vytvoril stranku MFK Dukla Banská Bystrica, nemohlo by sa pokracovat v povodnej stranke, s tym ze by sa tam doplnila fuzia s Kremnickou a premenovanie na MFK Dukla[1]? Pride mi to ako logicke pokracovanie povodneho klubu s mierne uprevenym nazvom a podobnym logom[2]. Co si o tom myslis?

(Svk fan) 23:10, 2 May 2018 (CET)

Cau, tak ono to je zlozitejsie s tymi nasimi klubami, tusim dukla mala velke dlhy, preto uz nemohla pokracovat... kremnicka sa preto obetovala aby sa zachranila znama znacka, urcite to dava logiku ze je to pokracovatel dukly bb... chcelo by to nejake vyjadrenie od kompetetnych z klubu ako to vlastne s duklou je... ci je to uplne novy klub ci pokracovatel dukly pomocou licencie kremnicky...a asi by sme mali diskusiu preniest do SVK casti wiki nakolko tato je ENGLISH :) (IQual) 03:06, 3 June 2018 (CET)

Ak vies kde tak to tam kludne otvor, ja na tu Slovensku az tak velmi nechodim :) (Svk fan) 22:02, 3 June 2018 (CET)
Podla tohto clanku to vyzera ze kluby sa spojili, takze by som to videl ako pokracovanie znacky Dukla.[1] (Svk fan) 15:07, 6 June 2018 (CET)

cau (Svk fan), -tak asi to tak bude, je to podobny pripad ako ked FC Licartovce zachranili vtedajsie MFK Kosice...takze skusim to prepojit opat na dukla s tym ze nazov sa zmeni a v historii uvediem zlucenie dvoch klubov pod znackou MFK Dukla BB. Do celoštátnej súťaže sa vďaka Dukle vracia slávna značka. Neobávate sa negatívnych reakcií, vzhľadom na to, že Banskú Bystricu zachránilo jedine spojenie s Kremničkou? „Kremnička bola prakticky farmou Dukly, pôsobí tú gro hráčov i trénerov z Banskej Bystrice. Je dôležité, že sa zachovala značka, pretože keby sa to tu rozpadlo, neviem, ako by to dopadlo s futbalom v Banskej Bystrici. Takto môžeme v horizonte niekoľkých rokov uvažovať aj nad návratom medzi elitu.“ (IQual) 17:30, 6 June 2018 (CET)

Uz som to prehodil (okrem nazvu), bude treba to nove MFK zmazat aby sa dal stary FK premenovat (Svk fan) 13:07, 15 June 2018 (CET)

Nomination of Ivan Múdry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivan Múdry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Múdry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adam Danko

Hello, IQual. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Adam Danko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Artúr Musák

Hello, IQual. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Artúr Musák".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Jackuliak

Hello, IQual. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Jackuliak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lukáš Šimko

Hello, IQual. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lukáš Šimko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Gomola

Hello, IQual. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Martin Gomola".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Juritka

Hello, IQual. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Peter Juritka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lukáš Kožička for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lukáš Kožička is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lukáš Kožička until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 15:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dmitrij Korman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dmitrij Korman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitrij Korman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 12:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matej Kosorín for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matej Kosorín is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matej Kosorín until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 15:57, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Damien Marie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damien Marie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damien Marie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 02:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No tags for this post.