Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23

This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
106		Pythian Games (talk)	Add sources
18		David Henry Barnett (talk)	Add sources
20		Fedora (KGB agent) (talk)	Add sources
1,131		Corpus Christi, Texas (talk)	Add sources
44		Aiapæc (talk)	Add sources
6		Spy Handler (talk)	Add sources
2,950		Vermont (talk)	Cleanup
1,239		History of Tesla, Inc. (talk)	Cleanup
11		Xylotrupes socrates (talk)	Cleanup
12,070		Tesla, Inc. (talk)	Expand
3,867		Austin, Texas (talk)	Expand
38		Law, government, and crime in Winnipeg (talk)	Expand
1,761		Tesla Model Y (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
136		Gigafactory (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
236		Mole (espionage) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,259		Cereal (talk)	Merge
41		Colón Province (talk)	Merge
405		Tesla Cybercab (talk)	Merge
41		Differential graded algebra (talk)	Wikify
157		Operation Monopoly (talk)	Wikify
474		Legal affairs of Elon Musk (talk)	Wikify
45		Postal holiday (talk)	Orphan
4		SMA Negeri 5 Parepare (talk)	Orphan
3		Maria Gorzechowska (talk)	Orphan
45		Rubus ulmifolius (talk)	Stub
15		The Impossible Game 2 (talk)	Stub
62		Gennady Varenik (talk)	Stub
50		Arco de Santa Catalina (talk)	Stub
34		Rosoideae (talk)	Stub
16		Rubus probus (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Do you remember where you got the coordinates for Bellfield Plantation at in this edit? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bellfield_Plantation&diff=prev&oldid=1271502578

I think the original was pointed at the cemetery/graves, curious if you found a source for the actual house location. I don't believe the roadsign/waterside is representative. Jacobsatterfield (talk) Jacobsatterfield (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, I saw no evidence that turnout was for the graves. The photo with the big tree says it shows "looking east from the Bellfield Plantation site". That tree is still there, where the turnout for the historical maker is. You can see it on Google Street View. Additionally, one can assume that the local historical society, which often has to apply for the signs, and sometimes pay for them, knows what they are talking about. The only times I have ever seen them be wrong is when they are trying to drum up tourist business and the real location would be bad for that. In this case, there are two turnouts on a stretch of empty road, so there was no incentive to pick the incorrect one. Thus the signs are as representative as it gets. Abductive (reasoning) 22:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hmmm, thanks, I'll try to do some more digging and find a citable source for some coordinates then. One of the turnouts is indeed toward the old cemetery, which is fenced now/closed to public. Some of the cited articles seemed to indicated the old house foundation was nearby on that side of the road, but don't remember if any actually had hard coords. Usually the NHRP docs will have a hard survey point attached, I'll start trying to locate based on that. Pretty sure the roadsign is there because, indeed, it's the closest spot that tourists would see as they drive by on the Parkway. Appreciate the interest/edits/fixes! Jacobsatterfield (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  ... Some good clues in the Hatch, Charles E. Jr. (1970) Bellfield Estate General Study, which cites an earlier Clyde F. Trudell, CNHP, 1938 archeological survey on Pg 54: partial, uncovered "the foundations of both the seventeeth and eighteenth century structures" "A vaulted brick drain 24 by 26 inches has been uncovered"..."runs from the house in an easterly direction toward the york river".. "a distance of 500 feet". Appendix III has the most comprehensive inventory and description of previous excavation, but it says no final report appears to have been filed by the 1930's Colonial National Historic Park superintendent. I didn't see an explicit coordinate set, so I'll keep digging.... Jacobsatterfield (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please, do not use the Citation bot to modify the capitalisation in languages whose orthography you don't know. Standard Croatian orthographic rules are available at pravopis.hr. Thank you. – Phazd (talk|contribs) 12:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abductive, regarding this edit, is there a particular reason .34 was changed to .7? Shifting the point slightly east would be a bit more accurate. Best, CMD (talk) 11:45, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,168 round points, mainly from 4 featured articles and 4 good articles on old military history, in addition to an assortment of GA and FA reviews.
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, mainly from 2 FAs, 2 featured lists, 8 GAs, and 16 Did You Know articles mainly on historical topics.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions), with 866 round points from 20 GAs, 23 DYKs, and 2 In the News articles primarily about athletes.
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 846 round points from 16 GAs about radio and TV stations, 45 GA reviews, and 3 DYKs.
• Hey man im josh (submissions), with 816 round points from 5 FLs about sports and Olympic topics, 46 FL reviews, 3 ITN articles, and a large number of bonus points.
• MaranoFan (submissions), with 815 round points primarily from 3 FAs and 1 GA about music, in addition to 9 article reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]