Hello! I noticed your contributions to Talk:Peyton Manning and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —Bagumba (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Peyton Manning. Please explain your reversion of the talk page, specifically why you think those templates should be added back. Continually reverting without an explanation is disruptive and will get you blocked. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• I agree with Gonzo on this point. The tag oversaturation almost weakens the value of the tags on the page. I also don't see any talk page discussion about COI, so I don't think the COI edit notice is needed. If you feel the tags are necessary, please explain why on the article talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 19:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Whatsupkarren. I noticed that you recently removed content from King Soopers without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. References removed Whatsupkarren (talk) 06:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Massie have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thomas Massie was changed by 71.114.156.203 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892366 on 2021-04-02T00:19:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:27, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Thomas Massie. Larry Hockett (Talk) 00:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:15, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]