I am in the process of reverting your edits. Every article about airports request independent sources for new air routes. As far as I can see by now, you have only added related sources (i.e. the airline). In other cases, you give no sources at all. Therefore, your edits feel the requirements. The Banner talk 18:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your latest edit on Lyon–Saint-Exupéry Airport. I have no clue why you removed a bunch of destinations. And what you added was incomplete. The Banner talk 16:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have again reverted your edit. The sources offer no proof of the connection just being temporary. The Banner talk 17:16, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brussels South Charleroi Airport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Banner talk 16:28, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lyon–Saint-Exupéry Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 16:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What in the last edit is vandalism

Temporary routes do not get listed - hence CRL being removed

BGY & FLR have valid links, start dates (as per article) and correctly sourced. 143.159.161.60 (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The given source does not state that it is a temporary connection. The Banner talk 18:55, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

First of all, thanks for sourcing your edits. Lots of editors, including a lot of IP editors, don’t source at all. However, 2 things to point out:

On airport pages with 3rd column references, try to avoid having the same source for both the route and 3rd column. In the 3rd column put the airline’s timetable (as other airlines have) or just put the main reference there.

Also, if you can, try to avoid sourcing with just bare URLs. Try to fill out the reference as much as possible. I’ve done this for you on pages like JFK Airport and Detroit. Please see WP:BAREURLS and WP:IC. Thank you! VenFlyer98 (talk) 18:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, As a reminder please try to use full references instead of just bare URLs. Sourcing your edits is greatly appreciated, but please try to expand your URL references. Check out WP:BAREURLS and WP:IC which explains this in more detail.

Thank you! (VenFlyer98 (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kefalonia International Airport without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Glasgow Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Why remove citation? Lemonaka (talk) 09:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Southampton Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Lemonaka (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I literally wrote - "flybe cut SOU routes" as the description, because, they have cut the flights, removed from sale and removed from website. I couldn't be more obvious. Stop with your utter bs when every edit is commented and sourced where appropriate 143.159.161.60 (talk) 08:54, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will serve Wikipedia best by adding independent sources. The involved airport or airline are not independent sources.

And please, pay attention to what you remove. Like this removal on Aktion National Airport where you not only removed two out of three destinations, but also the source belonging to the surviving destination. Please, be more accurate. The Banner talk 17:13, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind reviewing their most recent edit to the article I warned them for above? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:15, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding to Stockholm Arlanda Airport: what makes you think that the "SASGROUP" is an independent source towards flights of Scandinavian Airlines (or SAS)? I have reverted your edit. The Banner talk 10:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked many times to provide reliable, independent sources. But still, you keep giving related sources, like the websites from the airport, airline or parent company. By now, I start to doubt your competence to do so. Please upgrade the quality of your work. It takes to much time from others to correct it. The Banner talk 15:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Salzburg Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. And in fact all your edits of today The Banner talk 13:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lyon–Saint-Exupéry Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Robertjamal12 ~🔔 10:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lyon–Saint-Exupéry Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Robertjamal12 ~🔔 11:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Volotea have REMOVED Charleroi from its website, not available as a destination nor a bookable route. When I've previously posted a link to an airline website you state not a valid source - which is contradictory. Anyone can look and see its been removed

I am willing to believe you BUT stop edit warring, provide a reliable, independent source (note the independent) and stop with aspersions. The Banner talk 19:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chania International Airport. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.