The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) JJP_Master (she/they) 22:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United States Virgin Islands's at-large congressional district → United States Virgin Islands' at-large congressional district – Normalize plural possessive like we did at Northern Mariana Islands' at-large congressional district Dicklyon (talk) 21:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. "Islands" is plural, unlike, say, "Massachusetts". Station1 (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nomination and Station1. This article was created in January 2007 and the possessive apostrophe for its main title header has been unilaterally moved back-and-forth three times since then. The discussion will at least provide a record of the arguments and some form of consensus in case the matter is revisited. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: "United States Virgin Islands" is nominally plural and therefore the proposal is aligned with MOS:PLURALNOUN. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This was a contested technical request: permalink, for reference. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Indeed. I thought it would be obviously noncontroversial after we did the same after the recent discussion at Talk:Northern Mariana Islands' at-large congressional district, so I originally proposed it as a technical. But since it had been moved back and forth before, they said it was automatically controversial. So here we are. Dicklyon (talk) 06:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]