This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: Genetics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Human Genetic History (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Genetic studies on Filipinos → Genetic and anthropometric studies on Filipinos – According to the standard set by the Japanese article: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_and_anthropometric_studies_on_Japanese_people" there is much useful data which can support genetic data itself if the studies are paired with anthropometric data, and quite frankly there has been a build up anthropology information concerning the Philippines in recent years, like these 4 references: [1], [2],[3], and[4]; and that DESPITE the CRUCIALNESS of these information when determining the status of Filipinos, anthropologically and genetically, these studies are practically orphans in Wikipedia since they are not covered by any article pertaining to the Anthropology of Filipinos, which is unlike that which is accorded to Japan at the previously cited article, which in my opinion is unfair, as the Philippines is more anthropologically complex but it doesn't have it's own dedicated Anthropology Article, thus I suggest the name change and expansion of scope for this article so that I can write in information pertaining to Philippine Anthropology, truly yours!--Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 12:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Delirium333, @Charles Jayson Zaldivar, @Sanglahi86, what do you think of my proposal? --Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 12:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

agree Delirium333 (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your agreement brother. :) --Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with you, but I have a slight suggestion, instead of... "Genetic and anthropometric studies on Filipinos", how about the expanded article be entitled, "Genetic and anthropology studies on Filipinos" so that the scope would be broader and you can put in more data? Either way, I support your proposals, since we do need somewhere to place the anthropology studies you mentioned. Charles Jayson Zaldivar (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! If the topic is more about Anthropology rather than just Anthropometry, we can also put in other information from other sciences like population statistics and immigration records. I will ask a mod to consider this other topic title. Thanks alot! --Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok man, I support your proposed edits, whatever option you choose, as this topic is under-studied in Wikipedia.Charles Jayson Zaldivar (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]