This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

South Africa Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: Political parties Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force. Socialism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The lead is too short. This article has 4333 words of prose but its lead only had three sentences giving basic information about the party. Yue🌙 08:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Helper201 you reverted my edits supported by reliable sources (i revomed "communism" because it is not supported by the source) and asked me to discuss them on the talk page. what are your objections? 2.63.181.178 (talk) 14:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When you replace content, the onus is on you to argue why existing sources are inadequate. Your only statement in this regard is "i revomed [sic] 'communism' because it is not supported by the source". There are multiple sources in the article body that discuss the EFF's adherence to communism, but since you said "source", I assume you meant the source you removed, which is titled "EFF to launch communism workshops". The source explains: "Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) plans on holding political and economic education workshops to teach its members political governance using communist thinkers. The essentials of Marxist economics and the theory of decolonisation, founded in a combination of Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin and Frantz Fanon writings will guide the workshops."

If you have a grievance with the credibility of the sources given (WP:RS), that's a different argument. Yue🌙 22:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yue the wikipedia article doesn't say that it's communist and the source doesn't say so:

the eff dont call themselves communists and they aren't usually described so; the source article doesn't say that they are communists either, it says that they will study communist thinkers on their seminars, but it doesn't automatically make them communists

the party is communist if it makes its goal, at least in theory, to build a communist society

the eff rely on marxism-leninism in anti-colonial/anti-imperialist/whatever struggle, but they don't proclaim communism as their goal, and that's why they they call themselves "marxist-leninists", but not "communists" 2.63.181.178 (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The ideology section is incorrect. They're black supremacists, not nationalist. 47.161.155.158 (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The EFF constitution both states “… subscribes to the Marxist-Leninist…” and later states “identifies itself as Marxist, Leninist…”;
However, then the FAQ on political education is a bit more detailed and identifying as “Marxist/Leninist” but self-describes as essentially Trotskyist in all but name (detailed in document). Trotskyists would oppose Marxism-Leninism as Stalinism, though would still adhere to Leninist and Marxist ideology as Bolshevik-Leninism.

Would it be more appropriate to replace Marxist-Leninist with Marxist, Leninist and Trotskyist in ideology and the Infobox? R0paire 09:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]