Barnes v. Felix is a pending United States Supreme Court case on excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment.[1][2] The court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine, which looks only at the narrow window in which a police officer's safety was threatened to determine whether his actions were reasonable, in evaluating claims that police officers used excessive force under the Fourth Amendment.[3]

Oral arguments were held on 22 January 2025.[4]

Background

At 2:45 pm[5] CT on 28 April 2016, 24-year-old Black man Ashtian Barnes was driving a rented silver Toyota Corolla on the Sam Houston Tollway in Houston, Texas when he was pulled over by Officer Roberto Felix Jr. of the Harris County Constable Precinct 5 due to toll violations connected to the car.[6]

When asked, Barnes could not show a driver's license nor proof of insurance, telling Felix that it may be in the trunk of the car. Barnes turned off the car engine and removed the keys from the ignition. Felix later claimed to have smelled marijuana, an illegal recreational substance in the state of Texas; no trace of drugs were ever found in the car nor on Barnes.[5] After the shooting, a firearm was recovered from the glove compartment of the car.[3][5]

Felix ordered Barnes to exit the vehicle and pulled out his gun. The car then began to roll forward while the door was open and Felix jumped onto the car while pointing his gun at Barnes and fired two shots, killing Barnes.[3][7] He was hit in the torso and died at the scene.[5]

Felix had been a police officer since 2004 and was involved in another fatal shooting in 2007. He was not disciplined for Barnes' killing.[5]

The Houston Police Department, which is separate from the constable's office that employed Felix, and the Harris County District Attorney's Office were charged with investigating Barnes' killing.[5] A 12 person grand jury was convened which decided on 31 August 2016 not to bring charges against Felix in the death of Barnes. Later that day, a Black Lives Matter protest attended by Barnes' mother and father took place outside the Harris County 180th Criminal Court. On that same day, dashcam video of the stop was released.[8]

Barnes' mother, Janice Hughes Barnes, brought an excessive force claim against Felix on her son's behalf. The Fifth Circuit dismissed her claim, citing the “moment-of-threat” doctrine.[3][9]

Precedent

In 1985, the Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee v. Garner that the use of deadly force by police is unconstitutional "unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."[10]

In 1989, the court clarified in Graham v. Connor that when hearing a claim, courts must consider the "totality of the circumstances", this is known as the totality doctrine.[11][12]

"Moment-of-threat" doctrine

The First, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuit Appeals Courts accept and apply the totality doctrine. These courts cover 32 states, 4 territories, and the district capital. While the Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth circuits all reject the totality doctrine and apply the "moment-of-theat" doctrine. Texas is within the jurisdiction of the Fifth Circuit. The "moment-of-theat" doctrine evaluates Fourth Amendment violations only within the context of the narrow window when the officer's safety is allegedly threatened, excluding the events that precede it.[13]

Supreme Court

Barnes was represented at the Supreme Court by attorneys Katherine Booth Wellington and Nathaniel Zelinsky,[3] Felix by attorneys Lisa Schiavo Blatt and Judith Ramsey Saldana, and Harris County by attorney Seth Barrett Hopkins.[14]

The Biden Administration's Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar filed an amicus brief in the case.[5] Zoe A. Jacoby represented the United States as amicus curiae during oral arguments.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Docket for 23-1239". Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
  2. ^ "US Supreme Court reviewing 2016 case where Harris Co. deputy constable shot and killed motorist". ABC13 Houston. 9 October 2024. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
  3. ^ a b c d e f "Barnes v. Felix". Oyez Project. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
  4. ^ "Barnes v. Felix". SCOTUSblog. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Lawrence Hurley (25 January 2025). "'Split-second decision': Supreme Court returns to the question of police killings". NBC News. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  6. ^ Liptak, Adam (22 January 2025). "Supreme Court Seems Ready to Reject Limit on Excessive-Force Suits Against Police Officers". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
  7. ^ "Barnes v. Felix". Constitutional Accountability Center. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
  8. ^ Barned-Smith, St John (31 August 2016). "Protesters rally after deputy is cleared in Beltway driver's death". Chron. Retrieved 30 December 2024.
  9. ^ "The four US Supreme Court cases to watch". BBC. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
  10. ^ Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
  11. ^ Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
  12. ^ Sullum, Jacob (7 October 2024). "A Texas cop endangered himself by jumping onto a moving car. Then he shot the driver". Reason. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
  13. ^ "23-1239 Barnes v. Felix" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. 4 October 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 January 2025. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
  14. ^ "No. 23-1239". Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 30 December 2024.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_v._Felix
No tags for this post.