This page has been created to help to assess articles related to the WikiProject Middle Ages.
Listing Articles
Follow these simple insructions to assess an article for WikiProject:Middle Ages.
- Add {{WPMA|class=|importance=}} to the article's talk page.
- Decide the article's class using the tables below, and update the template in the talk page. For example, {{WPMA|class=start|importance=}}
- Decide the subject's importance in relation to the Middle Ages using the table below, and update the template in the talk page. For example, {{WPMA|class=start|importance=low}}
- Publish changes, and it will automatically update.
Criteria
Importance: the subject's importance in relation to the Middle Ages, regardless of the article's quality.
Top | Subject is a must-have for any print encyclopaedia. Roughly equivalent to levels 1-4 of WP:VA. For example, Crusades or First Crusade. |
High | Subject is important. Roughly equivalent to level 5 of WP:VA. For example, Second Crusade or Richard II of England. |
Mid | Subject has some importance. For example, Prades Tavernier or Battle of Durbe. |
Low | Subject is peripheral knowledge, of little interest to only a few people. For example, Bromkinsthorpe or John Lewe. |
Class: the article's current quality.
Detailed criteria are given below.
![]() |
A Featured Article (N.B. decided centrally through a formal review process). |
![]() |
A potential candidate to become a Featured Article. |
![]() |
A Good Article (N.B. decided centrally through a formal review process). |
B | The article is of a good quality, but has not obtained Good Article status. |
C | The article is of an acceptable quality. |
Start | The article provides some meaningful content. |
Stub | The article provides very little meaningful content. |
Detailed Criteria for Class
These are the detailed criteria per class/quality division, following the assessment scheme used by the Wikipedia V1.0 Editorial team.
You must be logged in to post a comment.