The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Peohe's → Chart House  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

My external searches indicate that this is "A Chart House restaurant". However, there is no discussion of this offshoot at the target article. No mention of "Peohe's" anywhere on Wikipedia except for at Cooronado, California, the location of the restaurant where it is mentioned. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting that the correct link is Coronado, California.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete newly created redirect lacking context and content -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. Drdpw (talk) 13:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Robbed at gunpoint → Robbery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely method of navigating to the page about "robbery", when "robbed" is already a part of the term. As for "gunpoint", the word "gun" is only said once in the article and not in the context of robbery (i.e. describing someone's nickname as "the submachine gun soloist"). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Has one incoming link from Sports Team, which was added by the redirect creator. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Article covers armed robbery, and I could see someone searching this. -Samoht27 (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The redirect has had 10 pageviews before it was listed on here and 25 total pageviews. So people are searching for it. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning keep, per Samoht27 and GoldenBootWizard276. BD2412 T 00:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Appropriate target, harmless, useful to someone, WP:CHEAP. Fieari (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Pachacamac (Sonic the Hedgehog) → Sonic Adventure#Plot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Pachacamac the Echidna → Sonic Adventure#Plot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "pachacamac" at the target article to my awareness. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For context, Pachacamac is the character Tikal's father. It is a related topic, although it may not be considered notable. The redirect "Pachacamac the Echidna" (same target) should be dealt with in the same way as this one. — gabldotink [ talk | contribs | global account ] 23:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Bundled the two here now. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Not mentioned at target page. FOARP (talk) 14:08, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Félix Valverde → Alex Valderrama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect makes no sense to me. There is no mention of a 'Félix Valverde' at the Alex Valderrama article. I've done a quick WP:BEFORE and also looked on es.wiki and can't find any reason as to why this redirect should exist. It was possibly made by accident. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is strange one. Lugnuts would sometimes create redirects after an article had been deleted at AFD, but I don't see any AFD discussions for this. he would also do stuff just to increase his edit/article creation count, and indeed just do a lot of stuff by mistake. In any event, Delete. FOARP (talk) 14:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A Felix Valverde without the é is mentioned in another article, but probably not worth retargeting. Geschichte (talk) 13:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Jayson Green (disambiguation) → Jayson Green  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Jayson Green is no longer a dab. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:CSD#G14. R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:05, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily Delete, this falls under WP:G14. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: There is a Jason Greene and at least two encyclopedic uses of Jayson Green or Jayson Greene, so a disambiguation page may well be in order to keep track of these. BD2412 T 20:27, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete G14. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:58, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda → Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas#Ah shit, here we go again  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda. → Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas#Ah shit, here we go again  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Redirect is a quote that a character makes in the game. Whilst it has been used in internet meme's and is mentioned (but not quoted in article), i believe this to be a highly implausible search term. Blethering Scot 21:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. BD2412 T 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Identical discussions and comments merged. Steel1943 (talk) 23:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I doubt anyone will be typing all that. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we are not an indiscriminate collection of memes. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – definitely an implausible search term, and a rather useless redirect. Drdpw (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Extremely implausible. Fieari (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• i'll have two deletes, a per nom large, an unmentioned with extra dip, a likely unnotable, two returns to red, one with potentially implausible punctuation, and a too long consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 13:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - VERY much implausible. At least, until it gets quoted in the article. As soon as it gets requoted, I'll reconsider User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 02:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I added the quote to a footnote in the article. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 17:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but adding this phrase as a footnote in an article does not make this a plausible or useful redirect. Drdpw (talk) 19:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep via WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) J947 ‡ ^edits 23:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Bread nailed to trees → R/BreadStapledToTrees  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect is misleading, nails and staples are different things and the subreddit's rules specify that nailed bread is disallowed. I believe there is an r/BreadNailedToTrees subreddit, but it is not mentioned here. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is quite plausible that someone misremembers what the exact purpose of the r/BreadStapledToTrees subreddit is and as such mistakenly types in "Bread nailed to trees" when they really meant "Bread stapled to trees". GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even if factually incorrect, it is still useful. r/BreadNailedToTrees is quite small, with less than 3,000 members. Staples and nails are both metal objects that connect things, so it is entirely plausible one would be confused. Redirects are cheap, it isn't bad enough to warrant deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icandostuff (talk • contribs) 00:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As long as we don't have a R/BreadNailedToTrees article, it's still the closest useful target. It can get tagged "redirect with possibilities" just in case. I'm pretty sure the R/BreadStapledToTrees article mentions that there are alternate subreddits for different things. Mrfoogles (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Close enough for navigational aiding purposes, and also gets an oblique mention in the article in terms of "there are other subreddits with other fastening methods", which is plenty for a redirect of this nature. WP:CHEAP applies. Fieari (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This is a textbook WP:CHEAP redirect that is useful as a navigation aid. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 13:46, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Unelected US presidents → President of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Unelected US Presidents → President of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Doesn't seem to be such a precise list at the target. These redirects formerly targeted United States Presidential trivia prior to its redirection (and eventually deletion). This phrase represents, I believe, 5 USA presidents (including Gerald Ford), but I'm not seeing a place in List of presidents of the United States to retarget these redirects to either that could be considered clear and helpful to readers and guide them to exactly what they are looking to find without difficulty search through the article. Unless a clear target can be found for these redirects which describes a comprehensive "unelected" list, delete. Steel1943 (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both - We don't need such redirects for Tyler, Fillmore, A. Johnson, Arthur, T.Roosevelt (first term), Coolidge (first term), Truman (first term), L. Johnson (first term) or Ford. GoodDay (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both – Neither redirect is precise nor is the phrase itself (does it apply to Ford only, or to the other eight who succeeded to the presidency intra-term also, or to Ford and the four others who succeeded to the presidency but were never subsequently elected to that office), thus they have little value as redirects. Drdpw (talk) 19:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment there is a list of all nine at United States presidential line of succession#Presidential succession by vice presidents, though it doesn't contain any information or make any distinction between those who were subsequently elected and those who weren't. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 08:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was restore. No prejudice against nominating at WP:AfD. Jay 💬 18:56, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Just another Perl hacker → Perl#Community  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

BLAR-ing an article without an AFD when the last not-that-long-ago AFD about the same article failed to reach a consensus to BLAR does not sit right with me. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 08:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• What do you want to do with this redirect, Mellohi!? Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Revert the BLAR tentatively. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 23:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imo feel free to revert. BLAR seems to have just been done by one person, and if there's substantial history then AfD is the avenue to deal w/ such possible standalone topics. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• It'll help to ping BLARer Thumperward who is an admin and semi-active (even 2 days back). Jay 💬 10:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The AfD was withdrawn, which is not an evaluation of consensus, but whatever. There's no more than a paragraph to write on this subject when you skip the code and ASCII camels, and that's what's at the redirect target already, but let's see if another AfD does a better job at settling this. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Baseball Reference#Easter eggs and other humor which resolves the 'lack of mention' issue. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:35, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Tungsten Arm O'Doyle → Shohei Ohtani  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Meme not mentioned in subject, though it looks like there enough coverage that it could probably be added in. Rusalkii (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 07:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Baseball Reference#Easter eggs and other humor. Although I didn't understand why that entry mentions Shohei Ohtani as a redirect to Ohtani's page, or why it talks about redirects at all. Jay 💬 10:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It's a redirect within Baseball Reference, not a Wikipedia redirect (searching "Tungsten Arm O'Doyle" on Baseball Reference pulls up Ohtani) Rusalkii (talk) 00:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Royal Crusaders Drum and Bugle Corps → List of defunct Drum Corps International member corps#Royal Crusaders Drum and Bugle Corps  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Why? I Ask removed it with comment Page overhaul. I ask you, Why?? What did you not like about Royal Crusaders Drum and Bugle Corps? Jay 💬 11:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  As mentioned in the lede, there are several hundreds of drum corps that have competed in the circuit. I started a discussion proposing the selection criteria to only include multiple-time finalists, and it went unopposed. So that is what I did. Why? I Ask (talk) 13:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. The only "keep" !votes were procedural in nature regarding the attribution. To resolve that concern, I went ahead and carried out what I call the "Qantas Flight Numbers solution", which is the record authorship and delete history option at WP:MAD. The edit history through the merge is now listed at Talk:Death Star. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Garbage Compactor 3263827 → Death Star  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of a "Garbage Compactor" at the target article, much less these exact 7 digits preceding it. In fact, the number "3263827" does not appear anywhere at the target either, much less "Garbage Compactor 3263827". No explanation or correlation between these exists within the content of Death Star, no mention of "garbage" or "compactor". Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This Fandom page might help clarify what's going on. The garbage compactor scene was very memorable (I remember it clearly even though it's been at least 15 years since I've seen the movie), but that doesn't make this a likely search term. I think any reader who knows the full seven-digit number would remember the term "Death Star" and be able to get to the target directly. If a reader is looking for information about the garbage compactor scene, we don't seem to have much; it is mentioned briefly in some other articles like John Stears and Super Star Wars, but not discussed in enough detail for any of those articles to be a good target. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete What Mx. Granger said. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Content was merged to the target per the AfD and I have tagged it as {{R from merge}}. Jay 💬 11:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per redirect-from-merge. It's not a useful title per Mx Granger, so if someone can find a way to delete the title without affecting the article history, I'd be happy to support it. Nyttend (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; it is an insignificant movie reference and an extremely unlikely search term. Drdpw (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If this is deleted without proper attribution, this is going straight to DRV: local consensus cannot override legal requirements. Nyttend (talk) 19:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Nyttend. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:33, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• An armored space station with enough power to destroy an entire planet → Death Star  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• An armoured space station with enough power to destroy an entire planet → Death Star  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

An even more implausible (and equally unhelpful due to equally zero mention) version. It is unlikely for someone to spell out this entire phrase, and for those who do, there is nothing related to this quote that we can give readers for these words. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nonsense, not a plausible search-term. FOARP (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom – neither helpful nor plausible. Drdpw (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Death Star#Original Death Star. Refined target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• That's no moon → Death Star  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of this unrelated meme quotation at the target article. People who are familiar with the "that's no moon" quotation are familiar with the Death Star and can navigate to it appropriately. When typing in a quotation, material directly related to the quotation should be provided if it exists, and in this case, it does not. Promising the existence of content makes this misleading in its current state. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Refine to § Original Death Star I assume readers would be looking for the scene that it appears when they are searching up this memorable quote. Ca ^{talk to me!} 07:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the line immediately refers to the subject. No objection to refining the target per Ca. BD2412 T 23:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Snape kills Dumbledore → Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nothing related to this unmentioned related meme about a Harry Potter spoiler exists at the target article. "Snape kills Dumbledore" does not appear, and we do not have redirects based on general synopsis of movie plots. This phrase in particular is referring to a meme, and as a meme we do not cover it anywhere on Wikipedia. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not covered on Wikipedia. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Also bundle the capital K - Snape Kills Dumbledore. Jay 💬 12:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, simply not a useful redirect. Drdpw (talk) 01:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Guilt is a wasted emotion → The Fabelmans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Movies are dreams that you never forget → The Fabelmans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• You do what your heart says you have to, 'cause you don't owe anyone your life → The Fabelmans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• You can't just love something, you also have to take care of it → The Fabelmans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely and implausible unmentioned quotes from the Fabelmans movie to use as a search term. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:14, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all Implausible redirects. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:07, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• So, even though you have broken my heart yet again, I wanted to say, in another life, I would have really liked just doing laundry and taxes with you. → Everything Everywhere All at Once  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely unmentioned quote from Everything Everywhere All at Once, not useful or plausible as a redirect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This quote is too long to be a plausible search term. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Too long. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I am never gonna financially recover from this → Tiger King  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of this quote in any capacity, nothing about financial recovery is ever implied, and no reason for people to believe that they ended up at the right spot, as there is no mention of this unmentioned quotation meme at the target, nor any content or references to substantiate the redirect. No mention of "financially" or "recover". Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Don't see a reason to keep. This is some rather obscure meme that isn't at all important to the main article. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:11, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• NotMyHeffleys → Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Long Haul (film)#Trailer reaction  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of this hashtag at the target article. Nothing for "NotMyHeffleys", and nothing for "Not My Heffleys" either, with the spaces. Seems to be in reference to a trailer reaction, but such a trailer reaction is no longer present. In the meantime, people looking for information on this hashtag will not be able to read about it in the articles current state, and will not automatically understand why they ended up here as there is no mention of this hashtag to begin with. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The section no longer exists, and I think a section about trailer reactions would be too trivial to cover. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I Gently Open the Door → Doki Doki Literature Club!#Cultural impact  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "gently" or "door" at the target article. Creator blocked for sockpuppetry. Unmentioned meme-quotations are not a reliable way of navigating to articles. It is far more plausible for people to navigate to pages based on the title of the game. This way via this quotation in particular does not seem likely at all. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. was about to tag for g5, but some other people edited it, so i guess it doesn't apply. that aside, i actually think it could be added to the article later on (at which point recreation would be cool and good). gotta put a pin on this, i shouldn't leave it han- dammit, that counts as a pun consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 14:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• delete we are not an indiscriminate collection of memes --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Don't see a reason to keep. This is some rather obscure meme that isn't too important to the main article. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I am Marvel Jesus → Deadpool & Wolverine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of the phrase "I am Marvel Jesus" at the target article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same as below. I'll support deletion here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Yet another implausible movie quote redirect. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Baby knife → Deadpool & Wolverine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "baby knife" at the target article. With zero context available to be read by searchers of this phrase, this redirect of two English words becomes very WP:SURPRISING. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As the redirect creator, I have no strong opinion on whether this remains. I'll support deletion, as it is a rather minuscule bit of fan trivia. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Trailblazer101: If you want it to be deleted tag the redirect with {{Db-g7}}. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, we are already at RfD for the community to discuss the redirect's purpose. I see no reason to bypass that procedure by tagging it myself solely because this discussion has already been started and received some responses, with potential for others. Once a redirect is brought to RfD, it would not sit right for me to unilaterally decide a consensus just because I am the author of it and could tag it, thus forgoing principles. I think it would be a different story if this had not been at RfD, but there's no harm in letting this discussion run its course for the community to decide. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not mentioned in target article. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - My first thought for this redirect would be some sort of child safe knife, and that's definitely the first thing that pops up if you google the term. I can't seem to find anything on the subject on wikipedia though... not even a generic "child safe" tool article. Do we really not have anything on this subject, or is my search-fu weak? My guess is the latter, but... Fieari (talk) 04:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Puny god → Loki (Marvel Cinematic Universe)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of a "puny god" at the target article. No mention of anything being "puny" at the target article either. Currently not helpful as an unmentioned meme redirect from an in-universe quotation said at some point, presumably. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not useful on its own. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I had originally redirected it to The Avengers (2012 film) where it is mentioned in the cast section: "To produce the Hulk's voice, Ruffalo's voice was combined with those of Lou Ferrigno and others; however, Ruffalo provided the Hulk's sole speaking line ("Puny god.") himself. Ruffalo earned $2–3 million for his role in the film." It is also mentioned in Bruce Banner (Marvel Cinematic Universe) in the appearances section: "Mark Ruffalo took on the role of Banner in The Avengers (2012), where the voice of the Hulk was a mix of Ruffalo, Ferrigno and few others, though the Hulk's single line of dialogue, "Puny god", was provided solely by Ruffalo". It is not a meme redirect but one of the most iconic quotations of the MCU (per this 2024 article). Sahaib (talk) 08:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the fact that it is the character's only spoken line in that film gives it WP:UNDUEWEIGHT. This is not a fan wiki, and I think a lot of these redirects being created for random quotes that gain popularity in the specific fandom if interest are only relevant or notable to those subjects, not to the large scale and readers of this encyclopedia. The one mention of this line at the Avengers film article is also UNDUE, unless ther was an in-depth analysis of reception from multiple sources to this line on how and why it is iconic besides just saying it is. Without sufficient evidence, it just reeks of WP:FANCRUFT. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No mention. Steel1943 (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not useful outside a fan site. Drdpw (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as there can be multiple targets per the redirect creator. Search results will serve better. Jay 💬 12:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:26, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wigga-Wigga → Viacom (1952–2005)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "Wigga" at the target article, much less "Wigga-Wigga". People who want to read about this unmentioned related meme are not currently able to do so, rendering this redirect as confusing in the meanwhile. "Wigga-Wigga" appears nowhere on all of Wikipedia. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawing, thank you! (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Arm-R-Clad → Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Well over a year after the previous RfD, no mention of "Arm-R-Clad" at the target, and no mention of "Arm-R-Clad" anywhere on Wikipedia. Without a mention, this redirect is currently confusing and does not explain to searchers why the redirect points to the place it does. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note Information added now. The article is a stub. PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawing, thank you! (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Hordis Brothers → Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Well over a year after the previous RfD, no mention of "Hordis Brothers" at the target, and no mention of "Hordis Brothers" anywhere on Wikipedia. Without a mention, this redirect is currently confusing and does not explain to searchers why the redirect points to the place it does. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note Information added now. The article is a stub. PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawing, thank you! (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• HGP Industries → Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Well over a year after the previous RfD, no mention of "HGP Industries" at the target, and no mention of "HGP Industries" anywhere on Wikipedia. Without a mention, this redirect is currently confusing and does not explain to searchers why the redirect points to the place it does. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note Information added now. The article is a stub. PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Max drive ds → Action Replay#Versions for hand-held consoles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of a DS version of "Max drive" at the target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Jay 💬 12:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• CodeJunkies → Action Replay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of this developer at the target article. Appears to be a separate entity, and anyone who wishes to read about them will not be able to do so at the target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• J.P. Grosse → List of Muppets#J.P. Grosse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

J.P. Grosse is not mentioned in this list of Muppets anymore, not even in the "Additional characters" section. LarryL33k (Contribz) 03:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• NDSh (Party) → List of political parties in Kosovo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unmentioned Kosovan political party. Bundle of which has already been deleted. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to Native Rebel Recordings, which is now mentioned at target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Native Rebel → Shabaka Hutchings  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "Rebel" at the target article; currently misleading redirect which sends people using a general search term of two English words, to a page where they are never discussed. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Native Rebel Recordings, which is the proper name of the record label. Should've made the redirect there to begin with, my mistake. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@QuietHere: Without a mention of Native Rebel Recordings either, people looking for information on this record label would not be able to read about the record label at the target article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Utopes there's plenty of coverage of the label which could be used to make a section on it, including a profile from Bandcamp Daily. I'll throw something together later if I remember. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done so. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:05, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy set-indexify. Multiple possible sulfonic acids. (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Naphtalenesulfonic acid → Sulfonic acid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of this particular acid at the target. "Naphtalenesulfonic acid" appears nowhere in the prose. It appears to be an unlikely misspelling at that, because Naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid and Naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid exist. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Namco System 86 → List of Namco games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No substantial mention about this specific system at the target list of Namco games. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:22, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. from what i can gather, it's one of them green computey things they put in gaming boxes to make them calculate stuff good (a pcb, i hear the older folk call it), so i have no idea why it targeted to a list of games that's full of links to itself. in any case, check the history, because it's got a surprising amount of that consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 13:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Bangladesh Army 2nd Commando Battalion(The Vipers). → Para Commando Brigade (Bangladesh)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I don't consider this redirect WP:X3 eligible due to the period after the disambiguator. However, the correct and incorrect versions of this redirect without a period, Bangladesh Army 2nd Commando Battalion (The Vipers) and Bangladesh Army 2nd Commando Battalion(The Vipers), do not exist and I'm not sure if the "correct" one needs to exist. Steel1943 (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).