I've listed this article for peer review because I have some general questions about the article that I'd like input on.

1. In the synopsis, is the use of quotations for in-universe terminology appropriate? Should I be using the emphasis template instead? Or should I avoid in-universe terminology altogether and simply paraphrase?
2. In the third paragraph of the Production section I've paraphrased the Mississippi Valley Conservancy source saying "The all-female cast included LGBT people and people of color, which is uncommon in media related to climate change." Is this a fact or opinion, and is it appropriate to state it as a fact in Wikipedia's voice?
3. In the episode table, should I include the different broadcast dates in addition to the original podcast release dates? I find that citing sources in a table tends to get messy. Should I provide inline citations for the data in the table or can I get away with not citing sources per WP:MINREF? If I listen to each episode and provide a short summary do I need to cite the episode as a primary reference for each summary?
4. Does the prose of the reception section flow well? Is my paraphrasing okay or did I embellish or editorialize too much?
5. Is there a better word or phrase for the heading "Academic outcomes"?
6. Rather than adding inline citations after each sentence I've opted to simply cite the relevant sources at the end of each paragraph (with the exception of the reception section). Is this appropriate and does it adequately maintain WP:INTEGRITY?

Thanks, TipsyElephant (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]