The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sam the Seagull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, unsustained, single event coverage of a bird eating crisps that was filmed and went "viral". Fails notability. Loopy30 (talk) 21:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Trivia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not the place to cover the subjects in every online video ever that lots of people watched.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, browse through the “individual animals” categories: absolutely jam-packed full of non-notable articles. Ripe for consolidation articles, if anybody could be bothered. Mais oui! (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.