Whoever did that thank you. I had wanted to do that but couldn't understand how to get it. Invasive Spices (talk) 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Blowup is an interesting choice of words. That film inspired The Conversation and othersab. That makes me curious why this term was used. Invasive Spices (talk) 23 January 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Borer (diambiguation) to the article Borer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 20 § Redirects with "(diambiguation)" until a consensus is reached.

Unsigned comment by Dsuke1998AEOS at 01:44, 20 May 2023

The redirect Religiously motivated antipathy toward Native Americans in the United States has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Religiously motivated antipathy toward Native Americans in the United States until a consensus is reached.

The redirect Film rehearsal in the United States has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 19 § Film rehearsal in the United States until a consensus is reached. Unsigned comment by Mdewman6‬ 23:54, 19 June 2023

The redirect SN-7619 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21 § SN-7619 until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sontochin has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21 § Sontochin until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 2.4-dihydroxybenzoic acid has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 21 § 2.4-dihydroxybenzoic acid until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 05:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Trump calls followers to save America if he is arrested, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 08:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello @The C of E: Because the page is grammatically correct and pertains to the target, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G1 section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion does not apply. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree. BusterD, please undelete, it was a valid redirect to a section that exists in an article that exists. Since the redirect was functional, it was not "incoherent text or gibberish", and so G1 cannot apply. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The reason why I SPEEDYed it was because the phrase doesn't even appear in the target and it just seems that long and unwieldy, that no-one would have been looking for it. I certainly didn't connect this phrase to the target article. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 22:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Literaly the same phrase in the target isn't necessary for a redirect, and indeed they are more needed when they are concept redirects which would not be obvious otherwise. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree it doesn't fall under G1, but should still be deleted. WP:RFD the place. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:14, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Trump calls followers to save America if he is arrested has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 4 § Trump calls followers to save America if he is arrested until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]