Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexey Pajitnov, creator of Tetris
Alexey Pajitnov, creator of Tetris
Created by Lazman321 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

Lazman321 (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

08:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 18 March 2025

Tetris (Spectrum HoloByte)Tetris (Mirrorsoft and Spectrum HoloByte) – After some consideration, I moved this article to the new name, but it was reverted soon after, necessitating this request. The one who reverted the move claimed that this article is only about the original version published by Spectrum HoloByte and its ports in the United States, considering Mirrorsoft's ports in Europe to be separate. While this is true, the scope of the article is intended for both Spectrum HoloByte and Mirrorsoft versions as made clear from the first line, with article even saying in the release section, "Mirrorsoft and Spectrum HoloByte would release versions of Tetris to home computers within a few months of the release of the MS-DOS version, such as the Commodore 64, Apple IIGS, Amstrad CPC, BBC Micro, MSX and the ZX Spectrum." Not to mention, from what I can find, the original IBM version appears to be the exact same between Mirrorsoft in the United Kingdom and Spectrum HoloByte in the United States. I've also placed Mirrorsoft first in the disambiguator given that the game was released in the United Kingdom first. Lazman321 (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For disclosure, I am the creator of this article. This is not to demonstrate ownership of the article, I just figured it might be relevant to the discussion. Lazman321 (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Hmm. I'm wondering if there is an easier way to disambiguate this? Not that I think there is any rule, but if the title in brackets is longer than the article title, its a bit more complicated. Perhaps something like "Tetris (1988 computer game)"? I'm going to assume if anyone is trying to decipher which Tetris it is, most people, even more casual fans of 1980s video games, don't know the difference between ELORG, Spectrum HoloByte, or Mirrorsoft. However, they would probably see the visuals of the game from the screenshot, and know from the look of it that this is not the famous Game Boy version or the NES version, or even the Sega arcade version if we clarify it this way. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the move because I think the proposed title is too long, and because I think the article is actually mistaken is confusing the versions. Although Mirrorsoft and Spectrum Holobyte were sister companies back when their respective versions of Tetris were released, only the DOS and Commodore 64 versions were the same game, and the DOS version was programmed by Spectrum Holobyte. The other Spectrum Holobyte-published versions in North America are all graphically-enhanced versions of that DOS version. Meanwhile, the Mirriorsoft versions for the western European market resemble each other, but are clearly different from SH's DOS version and the ones based on it, programmed entirely separately on the opposite side of the Atlantic, Which often resulted in two separate versions for the same platform in the separate markets. Notably, when a European magazine reviewed the Mirrorsoft versions, those reviews do not apply to the Spectrum Holobyte versions at all, and shouldn't be used as sources in this article. I don't think this should be moved, I think the Mirrorsoft versions specific material should be split out into a separate article. The review material alone demonstrates sufficient notability for a separate article, because, again, reviews of the Mirrorsoft versions don't apply to the Spectrum Holobyte versions. oknazevad (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do have a concern that, while the reception sections might be different, the gameplay and development sections would be almost identical given that most retrospective coverage either does not or only briefly distinguishes between the Spectrum HoloByte and Mirrorsoft versions. Lazman321 (talk) 02:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.