This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations This page is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 61 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

There is a discussion I started here about listing sister cities in bilateral articles: Talk:Australia–Japan_relations#Twin_towns_and_sister_cities. LibStar (talk) 04:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Venezuelan crisis of 1895 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sea of Japan naming dispute has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 Goma offensive#Requested move 15 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 23:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Germany–Japan relations has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The classification of the International Health Regulations (IHR) as "low importance" for international relations seems questionable. While the IHR is primarily a public health instrument, it has significant international relations implications for several reasons:

1. Global Cooperation & Sovereignty – The IHR requires countries to report public health emergencies of international concern (PHEIC), which involves diplomatic negotiations and balancing national sovereignty with global health security.
2. Economic & Travel Impact – The regulations influence international trade, travel restrictions, and quarantine measures, which directly affect international relations and economic diplomacy.
3. Pandemic Response & Geopolitical Tensions – During COVID-19, disputes arose over transparency, data sharing, and vaccine distribution, highlighting how the IHR interacts with international politics.
4. WHO’s Role & State Compliance – The IHR gives the WHO authority to coordinate global responses, but state compliance varies, leading to political tensions, especially between major powers.

Considering these factors, "mid" or even "high" importance might be more appropriate, depending on how broadly one defines international relations. What do you think—should health governance be more central in IR discussions? Shayer (talk) 15:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine#Requested move 24 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 09:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 Goma offensive#Requested move 15 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 12:40, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Yukon Quest for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 Trump–Zelenskyy meeting#Requested move 28 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 06:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

As part of our ongoing efforts to maintain accurate and up-to-date content, we are considering marking the Syrian Civil War as concluded, following the recent nationwide ceasefire, integration, and political agreements established on March 10, 2025. Given the significance of this event, we invite members of WikiProject Syria, WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Politics, and others to join the fairly new discussion and share their insights regarding this topic. Your insight and perspectives are invaluable in ensuring that our coverage of this topic is comprehensive and accurate. The date of conclusion is proposed to be: 10 March 2025.

Please join the conversation on the Talk:Syrian Civil War page. Best regards, Kaliper1 (talk) 13:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]