WikiProject
Southeast Asia

Shortcut

• WP:SEASIAWP:SEASIA

General information

• Main Project Page
• Assessment
• Participants
• Requests

Projects by country

• Brunei
• Cambodia
• East Timor
• Indonesia
• Laos
• Malaysia
• Myanmar
• Philippines
• Singapore
• Thailand
• Vietnam

Projects by topic

• Cinema
• Military history

Welcome to the assessment department of the Southeast Asia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Southeast Asia related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Southeast Asia}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Southeast Asia articles by quality and Category:Southeast Asia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Southeast Asia WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the |class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Southeast Asia}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA	(for featured articles only; adds them to the FA-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		FA
FL	(for featured lists only; adds them to the FL-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		FL
A	(for articles that passed a formal peer review only; adds them to the A-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		A
GA	(for good articles only; adds them to the GA-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		GA
B	(for articles that satisfy all of the B-Class criteria; adds them to the B-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		B
C	(for substantial articles; adds them to the C-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		C
Start	(for developing articles; adds them to the Start-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		Start
Stub	(for basic articles; adds them to the Stub-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		Stub
List	(for stand-alone lists; adds them to the List-Class Southeast Asia articles category)		List
NA	(for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to the NA-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		NA
???	(articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in the Unassessed Southeast Asia articles category)		???

For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:

FM	(for featured media only; adds them to the FM-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		FM
Category	(for categories; adds them to the Category-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		Category
Draft	(for drafts; adds them to the Draft-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		Draft
File	(for files and timed text; adds them to the File-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		File
Portal	(for portal pages; adds them to the Portal-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		Portal
Project	(for project pages; adds them to the Project-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		Project
Template	(for templates and modules; adds them to the Template-Class Southeast Asia pages category)		Template

The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Southeast Asia}} project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

• Request assessment/rating: Military of Champa(User talk:Koreanidentity10000)-please feel free to assess and review this page. Any advice and suggestions are very welcome, thank you! -25 May 2023 (UTC)
• I have expanded Gourd mouth organ please feel free to assess and review. Any advice and suggestions are very welcome, thank you! Ryssian (talk) 20:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• ASEAN–Australia Development Cooperation Program hope to get reviewed, thank you Annnnnnna2020 (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Mon State - re-assessed from start to B class Paxse (talk)
• Ho Chi Minh Campaign - already re-assessed to A class Paxse (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Cambodian Civil War - already an A class article and a GA. Paxse (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Kota Kinabalu - B class, needs some work to reach GA. Paxse (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Operation Shed Light - already passed GA. Paxse (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Gotong royong - still Start class, not quite a C class yet. Paxse (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Vang Vieng - looking for outside opinion for rating - is this the place to go? Mattun0211 (talk) 10:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Kith Meng - Request assessment/rating (Petersgoldpan (talk) 01:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
• Lan Xang- Requesting a reassessment and rating- substantial revisions and sources are now included, Thanks! StampyElephant (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Wat Phra Dhammakaya- Has now been assessed at C-level, and nominated for good article now. Feel free to help review. --Farang Rak Tham (talk) 20:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Dhammakaya Movement - Has now been assessed at C-level, and nominated for good article now. Feel free to help review. --Farang Rak Tham (talk) 21:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

• Rithtaung (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

• Category:Bruneian LGBTQ people by century (talk) removed.

• Duttabaung (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Traditional Khmer massage (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)