The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep/withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 20:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Unfallen (2017 film) → Unfallen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unnecessary disambiguation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a standard {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. No reason to delete. C F A 💬 22:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per CFA and as a valid {{R from move}}. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per CFA. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 23:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per CFA. --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Yep, that's why we got the {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} template: We keep these things around. Steel1943 (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Feel free to Speedy keep this if that is the policy. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Video game culture#Demographics. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Video game demographics → Video game#Demographics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The section where this redirect targets is not currently in the target article. The target article does mention the word "demographics" 4 times, but it does not seem as though there is a proper location/section within the article to target this redirect. Also, leaving the redirect to target the base article title Video game could be unhelpful since readers would have to hunt down in various places what they are trying to find, and even then, they may not find what they are looking for. I'm thinking this redirect may be a WP:REDLINK deletion candidate. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• How about Video game culture#Demographics? Jay 💬 17:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sounds like a plan. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Video game genre. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 02:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Videogame type → Video game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The word "type" is incredibly vague/ambiguous here. Is it meant to refer to genre (action, adventure, etc.), platform (PC, console, etc), medium (cartridge, CD, digital, etc.)? No idea. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Video game genre. Google searching "video game type" comes up with multiple of pages thinking you mean video game genre (without the "did you mean" hatnote!), and the two words are synonyms anyway. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 23:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Video game genre per mwwv --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above BugGhost🦗👻 10:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Game trading → Video game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not exclusive to Video game. Could refer to any subtopic of Game with a physical (or heck, some virtual/digital in today's world) representation. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague. Actually the first thing that comes to mind are trading card games --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Also Fixed-odds betting. Jay 💬 17:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Computer and video game distinction → Video game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

At the present time, Computer game redirects to Video game. For this reason, there is no distinction by default, so leading readers to any article via this phrase can be seen as misleading. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom; we don't have an article on that topic, nowhere for it to go BugGhost🦗👻 10:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Multiplayer Online Adventure Game → Multiplayer video game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• MOAG → Multiplayer video game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

The word "adventure" is nowhere in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is meant to refer or define. Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. (Also bundled in 'MOAG'.) I can't find any evidence online of usage. Seemingly just the creator's personal invention/modification of 'MOG'/multiplayer online game. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 00:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Tagged as {{R with history}}. Jay 💬 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participation was limited, the discussion was never relisted, and was forgotten in a July 22 log page. However retargeting to Online game as a suggestion that came up as one with "the most sense". Jay 💬 18:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Online multi-player gamers → Game#Multiplayer games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect seems vague/unclear, specifically since the redirect uses the word "gamers" instead of "games", as well as the word "online". Between several topics including the current target, Multiplayer video game, Massively multiplayer online game, Gamer and/or subtopics, amongst others, it does not seem clear where this redirect should target, if anywhere. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• A retarget to Online game makes the most sense to me. Maybe it's a bit of a synthesis, but that target has plenty of discussion of multi-player games and plenty of discussion of gamers that one would be able to get a feel for the subject. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Land 2 → Super Mario Land 2: 6 Golden Coins  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

wouldn't it be wacky if "land" was a common word in game boy game titles, "2" was a common number in game sequels, and there were at least 2 other games with both of them? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

off the top of my head, i can name

• kirbo's dream land 2
• donkey kong land 2
• bomberman land 2 (not on the game boy, but whatever)
• wario land 2

i don't know if this could be deleted as a vague search or dabified, unless someone wants to see if there's a sequel to the concept of land cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Ambiguous/vague. Steel1943 (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I was going to say disambig, but it's had 3 hits in the last year, and all the suggested contents (plus I-Land 2: N/a) don't actually go by the name "Land 2" - so delete looks like best option. BugGhost🦗👻 10:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as well as the other video games listed we also have I-Land 2: N/a as a possibility with no evidence that any of them are well known by the name land 2.--67.70.101.117 (talk) 03:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 23:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• "Super Mario Bros. 35" → Super Mario Bros. 35  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

overuse of quotation marks is a tony zaret thing. this is apparently the result of a botched move cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete as G7 - oh yeah, totally my mistake when I created the article and moved it to the right title. If I was admin I would have moved without leaving a redirect. I'm the only revision so totally should be a quick G7. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 21:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 12:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Sącz dialect → Sącz Lachs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not found at target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and speedy. This whole region is very complicated dialectally and in terms of terminology, and so things had to change. Vininn126 (talk) 19:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Lebanese Forces Cross → Lebanese Forces (militia)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not found at target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I believe it is referring to the cross on the flag. See the infobox ("Cross of Resistance flag of the Lebanese Forces militia, adopted in 1984"). Probably rarely used but no harm in keeping it. C F A 💬 19:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as likely search term per WP:RKEEP #3. Term is used in several news articles: [1][2][3] —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Vocal minority → Silent majority  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

this term is the exact opposite of the article it links to -- FMSky (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and add special Rcat. Catching the opposite of something is a valid reason to create a redirect pointing to the opposite of the redirect (for as long as we don't have an article about it specifically). However, we usually tag such redirects with {{R from opposite}} to improve reverse loopup capabilities, and this is what we should do here as well. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to WP:RETURNTORED. It is a frequently-used term that we should have a separate article on. A redirect isn't helping. C F A 💬 19:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. There might be enough material for an article here based on a cursory GSearch and GBook search. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:RETURNTORED per above, seems a plausible article. CMD (talk) 01:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move without redirect to Varsity (TV series). (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 02:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Varsity (upcoming film) → Prime Target (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I have no idea what the idea is behind this redirect but in my opinion it is useless The Banner talk 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created Varsity (upcoming film), someone else separately created Prime Target (TV series). It is my understanding that these are for the same production, and Prime Target is the correct title for broadcast. Hildreth gazzard (talk) 17:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but move to Varsity (TV series) since the subject is not a film per se, and the word "upcoming" is unnecessary IMO; also mention that "Varsity" was the original title of the series before production began. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Varsity (TV series) per Cyclone. 88.235.215.238 (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mystic Ruins → Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood#Plot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

either vague, or more closely associated with sonic adventure cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I was surprised to see this term has a clear primary topic - Sonic Adventure. Normally that would result in a recommendation to retarget, but the phrase is not mentioned in that article or anywhere else in article space (other than two passing mentions that would not make a good target). Thryduulf (talk) 13:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• This used to be an article. Tagged as {{R with history}}. Jay 💬 18:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Simbad link → Template:SIMBAD link  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unnecessary creation of a redirect that merits deletion. Intrisit (talk) 16:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, no valid reason given for deletion. 21 Andromedae (talk) 17:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  This rdr was created out of convenience. Other than that, why was it created?! Intrisit (talk) 07:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Being convenient is sufficient to make this a useful redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't find it too far-fetched that someone will only capitalise the first letter. Procyon117 (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: What was the point of nominating this? Obviously a reasonable redirect. C F A 💬 19:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  This is exactly what I don't understand. Should it be every time an editor/IP editor creates a "cheap" rdr to half-/full-capitalized link like this? Intrisit (talk) 07:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, if created these redirects should normally be kept. Thryduulf (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per all above. @Intrisit: if someone creates a redirect from a plausible capitalisation then that is a good indication that they find it useful, which is a good reason for the redirect to exist. Redirects are cheap, and that means that they should not normally be deleted unless they are specifically harmful in some way - and a nomination for deletion needs to express that reason. Thryduulf (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 16:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Vice President Vance → J. D. Vance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Vice President J. D. Vance → J. D. Vance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This is misleading. Vance is currently not the Vice President nor has he ever been the Vice President. Pages like this for candidates who have been VP were not created until after the election. Wozal (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a POV violation unless and until he becomes VPOTUS. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Redirects are not required to be neutral (WP:RNEUTRAL) and the article explains that he is a nominee in the first sentence. This redirects helps confused readers get correct information. Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ca Are you reading a different WP:RNEUTRAL than I am? In most cases, non-neutral but verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. There are no sources to verify the name "Vice President Vance", and none are likely to be proffered. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Here again, WP:RNEUTRAL makes it clear that an established term that is used in WP:RS are what should be an exception and kept, not made-up terms that aren't sourced. —Locke Cole • t • c 02:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fox News: What do political strategists think of a Vice President Vance?

Republican Governor's Association: “Together President Trump and Vice President Vance will fight tirelessly..."

Dayton Daily News: “I think a lot of his speech will talk about the vision of President Trump and Vice President Vance...”

Politico: But what could a Vice President Vance mean for Europe?

WSJ: Some Vance critics say a Vice President Vance's devotion to intellectualizing Trumpism could put him... Ca ^{talk to me!} 06:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of popular news media use "Vice President Vance" as a term for a hypothetical future where Trump and Vance wins. Readers may see these terms and search it up on Wikipedia, neglecting to add "nominee". It is not misleading since the article target corrects the mistake, in the off-chance that the mistaken reader (probably non-American who never heard about this person) genuinely thinks Vance is the current Vice President. Ca ^{talk to me!} 06:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's my fault for not being specific enough, but sources that speak of a hypothetical name aren't really sufficient to justify this. This term isn't "established" as all uses are either direct quotations of politicians hoping for this or indirect uses just using the term as a "what-if" title. And to some extent WP:CRYSTALBALL applies here, obviously. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also do not understand the vague references to CRYSTALBALL. Wikipedia aren't claiming any predictions by having a incorrect or hypothetical future search term lead an article that has the correct context.

I see readers using this redirect for two reasons:

1) Clueless readers thinking Vance is really the vice president due to being unfamiliar with US politics or being misled by headlines like "What do political strategists think of a Vice President Vance?".

2) Those who know Vance is a nominee, but still neglected to add it as a keyword since it is longer.

It is useful and therefore fulfills a redirect's purpose. I won't discuss further since I'm clearly in the minority. Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. We're not in the business of predicting the future. - Eureka Lott 16:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. He is only a nominee for vice president. If he becomes vice president, then fair enough. But not right now. Procyon117 (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now. WP:CRYSTAL and faulty/misleading WP:SEO based on the present day situation. Steel1943 (talk) 21:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, recreate IF they win... - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added/bundled Vice President J. D. Vance into this nomination. Steel1943 (talk) 21:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both per WP:CRYSTAL. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 23:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snow delete both per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SNOW. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (and for the record, I would support the deletion of President Kamala Harris as well). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:POV IP75 (talk) 01:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:POV is not a reason to delete a redirect, see WP:RNEUTRAL. Thryduulf (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Same reason we don't have a President Harris redirect. If he wins in November, the redirect can be recreated. cookie monster 755 02:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL. They can always be recreated if he's elected into office. Keivan.f^Talk 13:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign. Obviously, per WP:CRYSTAL, the redirect should not stay pointing to its current target. However, he is already being referred to as a hypothetical Vice President Vance and thus this redirect should exist, pointing to the article which describes his possibility of becoming vice president. 222.154.34.197 (talk) 08:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Refine to FX (international)#South Africa. Jay 💬 15:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• FX (African TV channel) → FX (international)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Since Rosguill saw no worth in having content for this title out of GNG concerns, I've listed it here for a possible deletion. Intrisit (talk) 15:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine to FX (international)#South Africa. Why would we delete this? C F A 💬 20:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The answer to your question is to check the last two log screens of this page's page history and understand why I nominated this. Intrisit (talk) 08:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  A subject not meeting the GNG is not the same as the title not being a good redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine per CFA, this is a plausible search term for which we have relevant content. Thryduulf (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The Economic Times (India) → The Economic Times  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Requesting deletion of unnecessary redirect created in 2013. Intrisit (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Readers may believe there be multiple publication with the name "The Economic Times", and add a natural-looking disambiguator (India) to disambiguate it. Seems clear and useful to me. Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a harmless {{r from unnecessary disambiguation}}. It's in use in 19 articles, so deleting it would be a bad idea. - Eureka Lott 16:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: standard {{r from unnecessary disambiguation}}. C F A 💬 19:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that I removed the incoming links. Jay 💬 15:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Bullitt (disambiguation). Jay 💬 15:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bullitt (album) → Bullitt (Wilton Felder album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There is also Bullitt (soundtrack), and this redirect is too confusing. saebou (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Tagged redirect since it wasn't tagged by the nom. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Bullitt (disambiguation) as a {{r from incomplete disambiguation}}. This definitely shouldn't be deleted, because Bullitt (Wilton Felder album) was at this title until a few hours ago. - Eureka Lott 13:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above. Even if this wasn't a {{R from move}} it would be a plausible search term for someone who knows one album exists but doesn't know about the other. Thryduulf (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Bullitt (disambiguation) per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 18:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Leica MD-2 → Leica M4#MD-2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Right now only seems to be mentioned in Leica M1. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The redirect points to the M4 article, because the Leica MD-2 is a simplified derivative of the Leica M4-2. I have added a sentence about it including a reference to the article. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since it is now mentioned at the target. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).