Pending changes backlog (review log) Low backlog [view • purge • ] 7 pages according to DatBot 07:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Backlog 3-month backlog at AFC. There are currently 2,469 pending submissions. [view • purge • ]

The article Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) for comments about the article, and Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Monica Smit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Monica Smit was ordered to pay Victoria Police's legal bill of about A$250,000, despite winning a lawsuit against them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Monica Smit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Monica Smit), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jarrad Searby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Idoghor Melody (talk) 12:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jarrad Searby, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jarrad Searby left the Proud Boys after he became angry with their disavowal of neo-Nazism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jarrad Searby. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jarrad Searby), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,227 views (685.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article African gangs moral panic, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the political and media storm around so-called African gangs in Australia has been described by academics as a moral panic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/African gangs moral panic. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, African gangs moral panic), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the post on RfC and your reply. I liked your short and sweet response, and thought you could use a beer after dealing with that. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 04:44, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GeogSage, are you referring to the COVID one? TarnishedPath^talk 05:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, although I'd imagine the Geography one probably calls for a beer as well. GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 16:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Avi Yemini you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chetsford -- Chetsford (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Avi Yemini you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Avi Yemini and Talk:Avi Yemini/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chetsford -- Chetsford (talk) 06:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the successful GA! Please think about nominating it for WP:DYK. Chetsford (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chetsford thanks for your time reviewing the nomination. Ps, nominated for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Avi Yemini. Feel free to suggest any alternative hooks. TarnishedPath^talk 07:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Avi Yemini you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avi Yemini for comments about the article, and Talk:Avi Yemini/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chetsford -- Chetsford (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping address that disruption. Enjoy a few berries! ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti it's Friday afternoon here so I'm off at happy hour. Enjoy your weekend. TarnishedPath^talk 04:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am too far behind on the conversation on that talk page to catch up, but would be willing to offer my two cents if you want me to comment on something in particular. Because of the formatting of that whole discussion, I just don't know for certain what everyone is talking about. Thanks for working on that article! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:56, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good. The editor has been trying to claim that I am in a one against many situation, that there are four editors for the addition of "and society" and only me against. Their numbers include you as one of the four when your last statement on it was that you didn't think it's necessary but that it's not a big deal for you. TarnishedPath^talk 04:07, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My approximate understanding of that phrase was that it was accurate and adequate either way, but the back and forth between you and Moxy makes me wonder if I should look into it more. Thanks for summarizing. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the back and forth between myself and moxy was a discussion about whether "white settler society" or "Euro-Canadian culture" was better, nothing to do with the addition of "and society" on the end of "Euro-Canadian culture". They made an edit which added that Canada was a settler society, to the prose and I'm happy with that as a compromise. The issue now is the other editor is continuing to push "and society" claiming that there 4 for it and 1 against when that is simply not the case. I'm not sure if they are misinterpreting what others write or if they're straight up gaslighting. TarnishedPath^talk 04:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you please relist the RM? There was only one participant, some of us missed this one (it was only listed once, for the seven days. There are so many RM's on de-capping), and, most importantly, this topic may be covered by MOS:GEOCAPS. Please read GEOCAPS and see if you agree that it may (emphasize "may") cover these articles about named and defined places on Earth which have been uppercased since 2013 with no complaint. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since there are only two editors involved, the nominator Dicklyon and the supporter Cinderella157, will alert them to this request to see if they can argue, and are 100% sure, that MOS:GEOCAPS does not count. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it applies. And it links more specific relevant advice such as Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Names of classes, which says "As usual, we look to sources to determine what is conventionally capitalized." That's what I did in proposing these moves, as with plates, terranes, triple junctions, and such. Dicklyon (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Randy Kryn, as @Dicklyon states above they referenced that the sources have inconsistent capitalisation and that therefore per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS we should not captialise. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Names of classes supports this. TarnishedPath^talk 23:16, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]