Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

There’s been multiple sources speculating about his return in the revival season of Scrubs. I believe that he is notable. Let me know what you think. MrHunter25 (talk) 19:55, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MrHunter25: I watched it religiously. If its a news, it will be popular. Revert it. Somebody else may review it though. scope_creep^Talk 20:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve only just started watching it. MrHunter25 (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been reverted again. MrHunter25 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MrHunter25: You can't revert it. It has been sent to Afd and decision was a redirect. You can't revert it again or likely blocked. scope_creep^Talk 04:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For all of your hard work at AfDs. Keep it up, 4,000+ strong! Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 16:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Iljhgtn: Thank you. Its well appreciated. I don't think I've seen it before, which makes it more cool. scope_creep^Talk 16:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Seen what? This barnstar!? It is a pretty common one, and well deserved. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 16:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Talk:List of schools in Zimbabwe#Keep the blue links only. You can join the discussion if you like. BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BhikhariInformer: How goes it. Unfortunately I don't know much about this. I don't even think I've even worked on a school article to be honest, even taken one to Afd, so I'll have to give it a miss. Thanks for considering me though. scope_creep^Talk 11:07, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all! I just thought that I'd check in since your policy inputs are always very sharp. But I completely understand. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Scope creep AfD's hoax analysis, harassing in Royiswariii's talk page. ROY is WAR Talk! 11:51, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foodics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foodics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pinging you since you nominated it the first time. MightyRanger (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robinson papers, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Orchestra was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scope Creep, new to this, wanting to give back to the site that has given me so much. Have you got any hints/tips for starting out with updating on Wikipedia? --Rettebdael (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rettebdael: How are you? I've left a welcome message on your talk page, more like a landing page. Please take a look at that first as it has a load of links which lead to different parts of Wikipedia. It may provide some ideas for future development. Generally you could start out by updating articles via Wikipedia:maintenance tasks. These are a whole series different tasks like e.g. spell checking or fixing grammer. Each maintenance task has a wikiproject, an area where folk gather to consult, plan and schedule. For example, the grammer team is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Grammar. There is Wikiprojects for all sorts of task. A lot of the tasks depend on your the particular strengths and weakness and what you like and dislike. Doing something like fixing grammer for example would be ideal if you had a good command of English grammer, which I don't have, so I would never tackle it. Fixing vandalism is another thing you can look it. Both of these types of task will get you used to the layout of the article, how they are structured depending on its type. A lot of that kind of stuff is automatically done through scripting so may not be as rewarding as first thought but will get you experience of what good articles look like and more so, what bad articles look like. If your particularly good at English and have some writing and research experience you could have a go at updating an article that has particular fault. For example, in the maintenance tasks list there is the section called "Improve lead sections". The lead/lede (two spellings) sections in the article are particularly problematic as they provide the opening context or meaning of what the subject is about. Its essentially a summary of the article and needs to be accurate. They are generally quite easy to write but easy to get wrong. For the reader a wrong lead is problematic. Fixing the WP:LEAD in small WP:STUB's, (small stubby articles) are fairly easy, just by reading the article and writing what you think the summary should be. Lastly, please check out the WP:TEAHOUSE for new editors, a place to ask questions, WP:Help desk for asking technical questions about problems on Wikipedia and the reference desk at WP:Reference desk for difficult factual problems that need resolved. Right, I'll leave it there for the moment. Its a lot to take in, but don't worry too much about it. The knowledge seeps in. I can check some of your work and provide some help at any time. Ping me any time. To do that type in {{ping|Scope creep}}. I'm here most days, except on holiday which I was last week. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 14:56, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You've been repeatedly warned, and previously blocked for behaviour such as what you exhibited at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colet (singer). Harassing, attacking and threatening those who disagree with you is not something the project tolerates, and no amount of warnings seems to deter you. I hope you use this month to rethink your attitude. Owen× ☎ 00:55, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the ANI discussion about your behavior at AfD [1]. There was consensus to warn you for your behavior and consensus against a topic ban. Please always treat your fellow editors with respect, assume good faith, and be polite. Do not make personal attacks or threaten retaliation for actions you disagree with. Toadspike [Talk] 15:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm not ready to edit any entries today, but it's to meet you. --ProFactDem (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ProFactDem: How goes it? Nice to meet you as well. No worries. I've left you a welcome message on your talk page, which looks like a landing page. Take a look at it when you have time. I'm here most days except when on holidays like I was last week. ping me whenever you need me. To do that type in {{ping|Scope creep}} Lastly, please check out the WP:TEAHOUSE for new editors, a place to ask questions. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 15:05, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My Lif vIs Mad Public, United States Of America Government Is Using A Ouija Board, Life Is A Life Set By Tested And Boasted.

I Don't Use Violence , The King 4 Use's The King Truth. --Holy Spirit Fourth (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, am very thrilled to have you as my mentor. Please how do I have my name added to Wikipedia such that people can look up to my name and access my detailed biography --Robdiamond116 (talk) 14:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Robdiamond116: How are you? Welcome to Wikipedia on your first edit. Well generally you don't add a detailed biography of yourself unless you are considered notable and there is a policy known as Conflict of Interest that governs the ways it is written. Generally when a person is writing about themselves, the article tends to be bit skewed, be a bit unbalanced and a bit puffy or promotional so it is generally discouraged but it can be done if you are notable and sources are available. I would write it for you. There is an area you can write about yourself until your hearts content that is known as the user page. Yours in located at User:Robdiamond116. Here is an example of an editor with a good user page User:Cullen328. You can see how Cullen describes what is background and how he came to Wikipedia and so on. Now your here, I've added a thing called a template to your talk page here User talk:Robdiamond116 which is essentially a landing page full of links to help you find stuff, which takes a bit of time. I recently discovered a new area on Wikipedia which I didn't know about so don't worry too much about being overwhelmed. It takes time to settle in. There is areas and folk to help you. One is an noticeboard called the WP:TEAHOUSE, which is for new editors to ask questions. There is a lot of folk up there to help you. I'm in every day unless I'm on holiday, so you can contact at any time and i'll available to help on most things. If I see one of your messages I'll be there right away. I hope that helps to get your started. Contact me anytime about anything. scope_creep^Talk 15:04, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Perdido Street Station, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wood was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Georg Schumann.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Is this a proper reference for Harriet E. Wilson? In my retirement I've been reading a sizeable collection of books handed down from my dad's father. My habit is to research terms, words and people that I'm unfamiliar with. One such book is Experiment Perilous, by Margaret Carpenter. Published by Little, Brown and Company 1943. In the story one Dr. Huntingdon Bailey is the lead character/hero. At the bottom of page 108 appears this sentence: "Dr. Bailey's office secretary-nurse was called Harriet Wilson and, unlike the lady who had born that name some time earlier, had as anonymous a personality as the name suggested." --Pepere'slibrary (talk) 19:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pepere'slibrary: How goes it? Not really unfortunately. Its not a good reference. I think the book is fiction and shes mentioned on the periphery. It does show she was known though which means there is more references out there. Try looking at [[2]], Google Books and the Internet Archive, Refseek. There seems to be plenty on the women. I see they made the book it into a film Experiment Perilous. This women is famous. There is a mountain of coverage. It goes on an on and on, e.g.

• Elwood-Farber, Lisa (22 June 2010). "Harriet Wilson's Our Nig : A Look at the Historical Significance of a Novel that Exposes a Century's Worth of Hypocritical Ideology". Women's Studies. 39 (5): 470–489. doi:10.1080/00497878.2010.484340.
• Ellis, R. J. (2008). "What Happened to Harriet E. Wilson, née Adams?". Transition (99): 162–168. JSTOR 20204269.
• [3]
• [[4]

Hope that helps.

I hope you stay. Its a bit overwhelming at first. Take a look at this wee vlog on how create articles: [[5]] and this one on how to create references: WP:REFB. Visit the WP:TEAHOUSE which is a good place for newbs to ask questions. I'm in here every day. Drop me message at any time. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 21:10, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ~2026-13025-33 (talk) 03:06, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]