Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to .
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Please also review the notability criteria for companies. Only companies that meet these criteria merit inclusion. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm new to wikipedia and I appreciate your patience and assistance. I see that some of my competitors and other companies have wiki pages that provide a history of theemselves and company and I wanted to elevate accordingly. (i.e.synnex) This page is supposed to be about me Denise (Nafisa) Abbott-Johnson and my role as founder and president of my company. I didn't see an option for that so I selected the "paid to post" option since I pay myself. If there is a better or more correct option, please let me know.

Further after reading your post above I belive I will need to edit the page and add more information about myself. It does kind of look like an ad in its current form. Advertising was not the intention. My family has a lot of history like the invention of the Chicago Defender Newspaper and Abbott Magazine. I simply want to leave some digital information for my descendants and anyone else who is interested. I'll go tweak it. Please re-check in a couple of days. Thanks!! Retroscorp (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are about notable topics, and are written as paraphrased summaries of material previously published by reliable and independent sources. They are typically written by independent editors who have no personal, political or financial interest in the subject of their writing. We have little interest in what the subjects of articles wish to say about themselves, be it persons or companies/organizations. Readers expect to find plainly factual articles, verifiable by citations to reliable sources, and written independently of their subjects.

The existence of other, similar articles does not guarantee anything. The topic of every Wikipedia article must be sufficiently independently notable to merit inclusion. Notability is also not inherited; someone or something is not notable merely by being associated with another legitimately notable person or thing. Notability requires verifiable evidence.

Writing about yourself, your family or your businesses is an inherent conflict of interest. While this is not strictly prohibited on Wikipedia, it is a perilous undertaking. You are not an objective judge of your own notability and will find it difficult to write from the required neutral point of view. We do not accept someone's own unpublished personal knowledge or experience, referred to here as original research. The subject's own website is a primary source, which by itself cannot establish notability. We require that a topic has already acquired significant coverage from reliable third-party sources.

Please also be aware that if you are notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia, you will never have any right of ownership or control over the content of an article about you. The neutral point of view policy guarantees that both positive and negative information is fair game, provided it is reliabily sourced, neutrally worded and given proper balance. Anyone can edit any Wikipedia article at any time, and you cannot insist that an article be "locked" at a version you prefer. That is why we say that an article about you isn't necessarily a good thing. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Epluribusunumyall were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Denise (Nafisa) Abbott-Johnson -AbbIT Communications and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Epluribusunumyall (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Retroscorp! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Epluribusunumyall (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Retroscorp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Denise (Nafisa) Abbott-Johnson -AbbIT Communications, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Retroscorp. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Denise (Nafisa) Abbott-Johnson -AbbIT Communications".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:28, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]