Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 2 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Okay so how do I edit --GoodieScripter (talk) 17:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

basically go to your personal page, then click suggested edits and fix what it tells you to! Then, if u want u can search something and if it doesnt have a Wiki Page u can click the underlined colored name to create a new page for it TimCheeseGlazer (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi --Brayden.frankcom (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TimCheeseGlazer (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have edited a few articles and I have been enjoying it quite a bit. However, my total amount of views on articles I have edited dropped from around 13k to only 10k. Is there any reason why this might have occured?

Thank you! --Gileselig (talk) 08:47, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well this talk is kind of dead, but I got some info from the Teahouse, but for me, it seems to now take a few minutes to load all of my edits to be considered but the total view count. It’s still a bit glitchy sometimes tho, and the numbers can fluctuate dramatically throughout the day. Is this a bug, or is it meant to be like that? Gileselig (talk) 23:59, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking higher up on this talk page, it seems many mentee questions aren't being answered.. If you still want to be a mentor, please attempt to respond to questions more actively, otherwise you can resign or mark yourself as away via Special:MentorDashboard. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hello admin,

This year, we’re really trying to make our campaigns more efficient , with a strong focus on quality edits and less over-reliance on AI. We want editors to understand the dos & don’ts of using AI/LLMs in editing, especially how to use them responsibly without losing the human touch. The team is putting together a TOT (Training of Trainers) for our community, and we’d honestly love to have you join us. Your experience and insights would mean a lot. We’re planning it for 6–7 February 2026. Please let us know if you’ll be available, and if you’d be open to helping facilitate a training session or share practical tips with the --DAnane(OFWA) (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! In the article List of World War I flying aces from Germany, there are multiple aces with the same number of kills. For example, Josef Jacobs and Werner Voss both have 48 kills. In the table, it is is given Jacobs - 48 and Voss - 48. So the thing is, I felt that in the case of smaller numbers like 12, there is a great number of aces and hence it is difficult to find out the number of pilots having a certain number of kills by looking at individuals. Instead, if we would merge all the cells having the same number together, it would be much easier to find out the number of pilots having a certain number of kills

What is your opinion on this? --Sketpick (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sketpick, I think that's certainly doable, and off the top of my head I can't remember any guidelines recommending against it, so feel free to go ahead and make the edit. Liu1126 (talk) 12:34, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Sketpick (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]