Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tyre, Lebanon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure what you mean. Please explain, with examples.

-Leewilliam236 Leewilliam236 (talk) 00:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brooks Heatherly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leewilliam236! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gheus (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PRMDMusicLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 01:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Never Say Die Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cinder painter (talk) 07:52, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me examples of how this article doesn't have enough reliable sources. In my opinion, I feel that I have a good amount of sources that would justify this article to be accepted.

Thank you. Leewilliam236 (talk) 19:15, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judy MacLeod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Never Say Die Records, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PRMD Music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert L. FitzPatrick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classmates.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore W. Petersen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NeoGaze (talk) 19:44, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, official records are not permitted as references for personal details of living persons as explained at WP:BLP. Only secondary sources or the subject's own source such as instagram or facebook is permitted. Linkedin may be acceptable for birth date and place but you would be advised to check first at the Teahouse, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 11:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the only reason for reverting my edits, then why delete Fitzpatrick's college and article about the "Ponzinomics" (his most recent book)? Leewilliam236 (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PRMD Music, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 00:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

I am going to decline this as a WP:BLP1E. I see nothing outside of the crime that suggests notability. This coverage is mostly local as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacqueline Ma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 22:04, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There shouldn't be any unsourced information and WP:PRIMARY sources should also be avoided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steeley Hubert Humphrey Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:29, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NCSSlogo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:11, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ASLOlogo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:15, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Firepower Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gfeberlinlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Skismlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 05:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SKisM, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steeley Hubert Humphrey Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 19:59, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate how the sources I provided isn't significant coverage on Mr. Humphrey? I'm not gonna lie, I'm pretty surprised that you would decline this, even though I've already given an extensive amount of citations that talk about him and anything related to him. Leewilliam236 (talk) 20:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Opheliarecordslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Never Say Die Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Never Say Die Records. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Barks (Woof) 13:04, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on PRMD Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRMD Music. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Barks (Woof) 13:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Steeley Hubert Humphrey Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sargdub (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Firepower Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 17:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't be silent about this anymore. Lee, please watch what you say on Wikipedia. Your retaliatory comment towards me on this draft can be seen as a personal attack and if habitual, can be reportable to venues like WP:ANI. Jalen Barks (Woof) 16:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Compare and contrast the two articles together:

- https://web.archive.org/web/20190215184518/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firepower_Records

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Firepower_Records

And explain how they are "substantially identical to the deleted version" as explained in WP:G4.

> Your retaliatory comment towards me on this draft can be seen as a personal attack and if habitual, can be reportable to venues like WP:ANI

The reason you got the response that I gave you is because you commented (and claimed) a rule, that didn't come close to what's being stated WP:G4, and after reading your comment on Draft:Firepower_Records I felt incredibly insulted by your patronizing and condescending manner. You've requested for speedy deletion under WP:G4 on two other articles, but both were declined for not being substantially identical. I mean, if you encountered someone that would say things that aren't (and turned out to not be) accurate, wouldn't you want to call them out too?

I don't call things out for the sake of calling out, I call out things that I think is worth calling out, and I think that your patronizing, condescending comment meets that perfectly. Additionally, you don't get to speak on behalf of the admin that have approved or declined the articles that I've written for this platform, and given that I've been active on this site for several months, I don't need people like you to patronize me about fixing ongoing problems.

Don't get mad at me if people point out that one General Criterion doesn't apply to an article that isn't "substantially identical to the deleted version". Leewilliam236 (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SharksIceSJLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 00:21, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The logo will be used in the infobox of Sharks Ice San Jose. Leewilliam236 (talk) 21:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Friends of Children with Special Needs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 18:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mvvoicelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leewilliam236. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brooks Heatherly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disciple Records, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sksatsuma 21:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a fan of dubstep and EDM in general since 2015 and it's always felt unfair that there weren't any articles for two of the scene's most recognizable labels. I considered making one before but I didn't think there'd be many good sources for an article to stay up - as my previous experience with the Au5 article (once deleted, now up) shows. Thanks. Do you have any articles you particularly like? LivinAWestLife (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Yeah, I was surprised that both labels didn't have a Wikipedia page already and I used to listen to them back in their heydeys too!

Google Programmable Search Engine is a great sidekick while researching articles that aren't likely going to be on Newspaper archive sites like Newspapers.com. All you need to do is add all the websites you want to do research on (I used some of the sources listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music, and it will search through the entire sites, that you added, for you. It significantly reduces the hassle of having to go through and click on articles that may have little relevance to what you're researching on. You don't need all the articles in the world, but the articles you do have need to have enough content to be talked about, so that others may recognize it as notable to stand against any claims for deletion.

I don't have a favorite, but if I had to pick, I would probably say Friends of Children with Special Needs: An American nonprofit organization that serves individuals with developmental disabilities. It's a good example of a topic that had a lot of coverage from reliable sources (most of which were local/regional), but, nevertheless, would easily meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Not just that, but what they're doing is also a cause that I really rezonate (pun intended) with.

There's also plenty of other people that also have a significant amount of coverage in media, but don't already have a Wikipedia article already. Some notable examples include Barely Alive and PhaseOne. Both have a lot of news coverage but don't already have a Wikipedia article, but would easily meet the notability guidelines.

Anyhow hope this all helps in your article creations! Leewilliam236 (talk) 23:48, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that was actually a typo - I meant to ask what artists (musicians) you liked lol. Nevertheless your answer was very interesting regardless. Seems like FCSN supports a good cause. I might have some form of Aspergers (though high-performing if I do) so its nice to see there's a non-profit to support neurodiverse people and those with developmental disabilities. I was also surprised that it had a focus on Chinese people, as I'm ethnically Chinese myself. Thanks for recommending the Google Programmable Search Engine as well.

For artists, my favorites besides Au5 will have to be VR, Seven Lions, and Xilent, and for the heavy dubstep scene Barely Alive, Space Laces, Spag Heddy, Bossfight, and Kompany are always great to listen to. I've been planning to make an article for Xilent but I never got around to doing so. LivinAWestLife (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see. Well, I don't really have one in particular, but if I have to pick I'd say for dubstep Bear Grillz, Barely Alive, Eptic, Virtual Riot, and Zomboy. There's also plenty of great dubstep (and trap) songs by artists that I also like to headbang too. For overall, I'd probably say deadmau5, Galantis, Hardwell, and KSHMR. I was able to discover what I mostly listen to electronic through David Guetta and then was introduced to other artists like Avicii, Skrillex, and Tiesto and have been listening to it ever since. Leewilliam236 (talk) 23:16, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anita M. Cal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:06, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leewilliam236. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3PAC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1995 San Jose State Spartans football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enterprise-Record.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Derrick Odum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3PAC, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GTrang (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leewilliam236. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Firepower Records, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Konya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:45, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Dangermond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Californian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MelbourneIdentity was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Firepower Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MelbourneIdentity (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Disciple Records

added a link pointing to UKF

Never Say Die Records

added a link pointing to UKF

SKisM

added a link pointing to UKF

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Disciple Records

added a link pointing to UKF

Never Say Die Records

added a link pointing to UKF

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leewilliam236. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ron Book, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bear Grillz, a link pointing to the disambiguation page UKF was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Barely Alive, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:26, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grapesurgeon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lot of the sources are effectively press releases; needs more independent coverage

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tristam (music producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

grapesurgeon (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dodge & Fuski, links pointing to the disambiguation pages UKF and Bass house were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]