I edit this page of ''The Signpost'', once I have read it. I also agree to multi-license all my contributions with the exception of my user pages.

Those four tildes ( ~~~~ ) they most certainly are not the 4 horsemen of the apocalypse. - honest!

Geography of Newfoundland and Labrador has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're a good person, I hope life is treating you well. Edmund Patrick – confer 07:02, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering if you could explain the note you left behind when you reverted my recent edit to Green children of Woolpit. The note says "Why remove a valid and correct wikilink and replace with one that is about plants?" I'm confused, because I didn't remove or modify an existing wikilink, I created a new one. It also wasn't to an article about plants - while the link text said "chlorosis", the link itself didn't got to chlorosis (which is indeed a condition in plants) but rather to hypochromic anemia, a condition in humans which is sometimes called chlorosis. I'm confused by the revert - from my perspective, I added a useful way for readers unfamiliar with chlorosis in humans to find out. Moonreach (talk) 16:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the contact and questions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorosis

Is the page that I am taken to on the link you give. It is not a direct link to a particular section of the article and starts explaining a condition in which leaves produce insufficient chlorophyll. That's why I changed it. What part of the article should it go to. Edmund Patrick – confer 22:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm absolutely confounded by that. When I reload the version of the page I edited, and click on the link I created (which is in the block quote that begins "The likely core of the matter..." it takes me to hypochromic anemia, as intended. It's a direct link and I'm not sure how you could be ending up anywhere else. The word "chlorosis" only appears twice in the article and the other one wasn't a link, which rules out the most likely explanation I could think of. I see now that hypochromic anemia is linked under its own name near the first use of "chlorosis," which in some ways makes this whole exercise redundant, but I'm still stumped as to how you experienced this problem at all. Moonreach (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

i thought you might come back with a reply like that. When next I have access to another device I will see what happens and let you know. I did feel there was a glitch somewhere along. Ta Edmund Patrick – confer 11:43, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]