Archives

01·02·03·04·05·06·07·08

Hi, Birdienest81. I'm just posting to let you know that 76th Primetime Emmy Awards – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:23, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Birdienest81! The list you nominated, 55th Academy Awards, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Birdienest81! The list you nominated, List of accolades received by Barbie (film), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Birdienest81! The list you nominated, 97th Academy Awards, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Birdienest81! The list you nominated, 76th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Birdienest81! The list you nominated, List of accolades received by Wicked (2024 film), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 03:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Birdienest81! The list you nominated, 77th Primetime Emmy Awards, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of accolades received by Black Panther (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of accolades received by Black Panther (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Birdienest81! Wouldn't it be redundant the use of double daggers to highlight the winner? If the article already mentions that the first on the list is the winner, wouldn't that be enough for screen readers? I would like to add that I greatly appreciate your work in improving the quality of Oscar articles :) Danoniinho (talk) 13:59, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Double daggers or some other symbol is necessary to highlight the winner because according to @RunningTiger123:, in the event that there are two or more winners in a category (happened at the 67th and 85th editions, listing them first on the list isn't sufficient enough for screen readers to detect which film or film(s) won. You have to consider the possibility where the tie or joint winners would look exactly the same alphabetically as if they would appear solely as nominees. Since this is a featured list, it is supposed to comply with all the rules including a new rule (5c) (It uses proper formatting to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text). And according to MOS:NOSYMBOLS (By default, most screen readers do not indicate HTML attributes like presentational text attributes (bold, italic, underline, monospace, strikethrough)...). You have to consider consistency for all lists and consideration for visually impaired readers. Birdienest81talk 23:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Birdienest81. I'm just posting to let you know that 78th Academy Awards – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 16. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]