Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 Archive 28 Archive 29 Archive 30 Archive 31 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62 Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 Archive 68 Archive 69 Archive 70 Archive 71 Archive 72 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 78 Archive 79 Archive 80 Archive 81 Archive 82 Archive 83 Archive 84 Archive 85 Archive 86 Archive 87 Archive 88 Archive 89 Archive 90 Archive 91 Archive 92 Archive 93 Archive 94 Archive 95 Archive 96 Archive 97 Archive 98 Archive 99 Archive 100

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Please post new comments at the bottom of this page, not at the top.

I have been adding more current photos I’ve taken of subjects and places in Sheboygan but User:Mrschimpf has reverted several of those edits, falsely claiming I’m some such of competitor in local media in Sheboygan which I don’t own any interests in media publishing in Sheboygan County. In one edit on Shoreline Metro, my photo of a bus in service was removed because he claimed permissions were questionable and the photo was posed. Then there is the challenge of updating the photo on Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Asher Heimermann (talk

• YaSiRu11 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ridma Weerawardena ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• "Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country [1]

• "Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network" [2][3]

Hi Bearcat,

Looking to get some pages made by Asopa Films put back up and to also save one from being deleted

Aisha and Rahul (2009) - this page has been taken down already, NON WIKI PAGE - https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Aisha_and_Rahul Depth of Pyaar (2019) - this page has been taken down already, NON WIKI PAGE - https://en.everybodywiki.com/Depth_of_Pyaar Zombie Beach (2010) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_Beach

Would like to discuss why these pages were taken down and how I can get them put back up and also make sure they stay up.

Regards, Winter

Bearcat,

Please link me to this wikipedia elections policy in which you discussed on my talk page.

Thanks!

You declined this draft, but I made changes to it that I think solved the initial issue. If you could take another look and give me some feedback I would be appreciative. Thanks for your time. WUH34 (talk) 4:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Since November 16, 2022, a user who is not logged in, just identified by their IP address has been adding information to the San Antonio FC page that has no sources to back it up with. Specifically they are adding a player to the roster when there is no evidence on the internet, either by the club, league, or anywhere else that this transaction has occurred. I have undone the edit multiple times but they keep adding it back. Please assist.

1/13/23 - The vandalism is occurring again. Would you be able to ban the IP addresses that are adding the incorrect information? TYIA

Issue has been taken care of.

Thanks for the edits you made to the article I posted on George Daniels Ekarte. It's my first article so I was a bit nervous Amfopo (talk) 13:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Would you please consider removing semi protection for Robert B. Dickey? Other than some bot edits it hasn't been edited in a few years. I came across it using Random Article. Rockfang (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen F. Lynch, Marty Meehan, Gina McCarthy, Marty Walsh, Robert P. Reed, Nellie Gorbea, Sabrina Salerno, Bill de Blasio, Bill Keating, and Ed Markey 2600:4808:9C70:6A00:ECDF:71FB:62CE:2D8D (talk) 08:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks. Do you mean as regards references? Waliyullah Tunde (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could I get a bit of background on what you're talking about? I've never posted to your talk page, and according to your edit history we've never interacted in the same place on any article talk pages either, so could you please give me a bit more information on what you're talking about> Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2034 in North American sport indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, would you mind removing the deletion notice from my sandbox now that the material you flagged is gone? Thanks GmTbNk2304 (talk) 01:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how things work. The template cannot be removed until the discussion is closed, and the discussion cannot be closed until there's a consensus to close it. Bearcat (talk) 01:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm going to move on the deletion page that the discussion be closed since there is no more material to discuss. Forgive me as I'm not as familiar with the rules. GmTbNk2304 (talk) 01:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not for you to decide, either. It's for the participants in the discussion to decide. Bearcat (talk) 02:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All I did was ask for the participants to reconsider their decision now that the material is gone. I really don't see what there is to discuss anymore now that the material is gone. GmTbNk2304 (talk) 23:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't see what purpose the page even serves at all anymore if it's just a straight-up copy of the existing article with all of the disputed alternate history content removed from it, but YMMV Bearcat (talk) 23:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I should clarify, I deleted all of the material. It's just a blank sandbox, I'm waiting to use it again. GmTbNk2304 (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 1 § Nightclubs by populated place on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:17, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twin Flames (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Flames (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 01:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NFL players using CFL infobox has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT, wouldn't it be better to wrap categories in the draft categories template rather than deleting them entirely? Electricmemory (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do this, so the categories don't have to be added back when the page is moved to mainspace Electricmemory (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat Indeed, just deleting categories from draft articles is disruptive behaviour, please stop doing that. Marbe166 (talk) 08:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy neighbour! I just finished writing a page over in my sandbox about a popular chain of candy stores based in Nova Scotia. I don't feel it necessary to put it through AfC but I did want to get a second opinion before I put it out to the world, and your username comes across my screen fairly often, so I thought of you. I've been questioning whether I should include the part about the labour concerns as reported by The Coast; I was aiming to include every bit of information I could find, but whether or not The Coast qualifies as a reliable source could be debatable. I would greatly appreciate it if you would take a look and provide your feedback. Cheers. Kylemahar902 (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Consider unsalting to redirect to List of county executives of Maryland § Anne Arundel (potentially protecting the redirect). Yes, I could do this myself, but I don't want to unilaterally overturn your salt. I wouldn't be surprised if he passes GNG at this point, but I am not seeking to open that can of worms. charlotte ^👸♥ 03:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

98.181.88.222 wants to go play outside. Polygnotus (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. A legal threat as a parting gift is a bit meh. I prefer cake. Polygnotus (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on the cake. I'm not into very richly sweet things, but I'll go for carrot cake any day Bearcat (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy, I’ve tried to create a wiki page for the club AFC Crewe owned by the organisation NUFAN article here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nufan but there is an administrator called Giant Snowman who persistently removes and at one point tried to SALT the article.

I want to know your opinion on the matter if the organisation is deemed acceptable by Wikipedia why is the club it owns not. All of the notability for the club is the same as the organisation and the organisation is acceptable.

Are you able to help me with this matter please? Iblethebible (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not deleted the article, just gave my opinion on its nobility at 2 AFDs. Repeatedly creating the same article is disruptive. GiantSnowman 13:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologise creating an article on something when what I perceived to be an increase in notability arose is not disruption though. Iblethebible (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure the community would love to open the 15th discussion about the poop category again, and I'm just petty enough to see it through, or maybe you can fuck off my userpage, yes? -- Ned Scott 11:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat, as someone who edits User pages occasionally and with some trepidation, I always find it helpful to link to policies or guidelines that I am using to justify possibly contested or confusing edits, especially when multiple guidelines or policies interact. Saying "yes it is" as an edit summary is less helpful than saying something like "Remove nonexistent category per WP:REDNOT." – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. its their user page stop fucking with it •Cyberwolf•talk? 15:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Liberal Democrat–Green Party alliance, which has been prodded in such a way that the message is hiding. Bearian (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]