|
|
IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI
Immediate requests | Entries |
---|---|
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 22 |
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 62 |
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests | 62 |
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests | 18 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 6 |
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests | 125 |
Requested RD1 redactions | 6 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 24 |
Open sockpuppet investigations | 85 |
Click here to locate other admin backlogs |
Administrative backlog
Reports
User-reported
- 124.123.190.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Edited several operating system related pages with made-up statements. Please revert all of them and block this IP. Colin Finck (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- 71.35.12.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Block evasion, WP:LTA. Previous IPs: 71.35.19.114 (talk · contribs · logs · block log), 184.98.192.0/18 (talk · contribs · logs · block log). — Chrisahn (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- 82.47.48.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. Disruptive editing: recreating vandalism drafts, and creating a draft espousing the WP:CHILD creator's personal information. Alith Anar 14:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- 102.100.11.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Mauritania–Western Sahara border (diff): vandalism only IP. M.Bitton (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Logan1838 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Annh07 (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- 152.44.16.220 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Annh07 (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
|
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 84 items Requested RD1 redactions – 6 items
|
- Crapper Jim (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "CrapFoo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Rehehehehehehe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Redroseworks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- XithStaff (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(admin|coordinator|bureaucrat|check *user|developer|moderator|oversight|steward|sysop|committee|staff)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Name may imply a position of authority -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Qwschoolca11 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ivanupintheclub (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yolococohowisthistaken (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "yolo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Although this string is not a username violation in and of itself, it may indicate disruptive editing. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Kristina Gweneth (Forum) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (CC) Tbhotch™ 08:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Rudolf Steiner Bookshop (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment: They have not edited about an entity called "Rudolf Steiner Bookshop". 331dot (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- It is the name of a bookstore that sells Rudolf Steiner's books, including one they edited an article about. See https://rudolfsteinerbookstore.com/product/on-rudolf-steiners-mystery-drama/ – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Konigsperrmull (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:19, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- GoTuckYourself23 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive and offensive username. - Toast1454 (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Qari Muhammad Ammar Khalid Sial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- OfficeSebastianKoch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username implies shared use; promotional edits to Sebastian Koch. Tacyarg (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Advans International (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (advansinternational.com). Annh07 (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Jsscash (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user page. –FlyingAce✈hello 16:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- 442on (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:CORPNAME, promotional userpage and promotional initial edit to user talk page. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Emiliobeaufort (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user page. –FlyingAce✈hello 16:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Discoveringbroadwayinc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Discoveringbroadwayinc. Annh07 (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- posting information about non-profit organization on behalf of company. Discoveringbroadwayinc (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Marketingwff (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
- San Diego Zoo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptions by IPs. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 216.30.155.0/24 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 13:04, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hope Hines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced and unclear information - something about a battle of restaurants - by IP editors. Tacyarg (talk) 06:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- S. M. Kamrul Hassan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Temporary extended-confirmed protection - Repeated introduction of puffery and unsourced biographical content by a registered user, currently edit-warring with me over it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Aha! (TV program) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Continuous unconstructive edits from IP users this month (specifically this Ip user[1], either unreferenced edits or subtle vandals such changing reference dates. Hotwiki (talk) 08:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:57, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Barli Inscription (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Constant edit warring Expectopatronum30 (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Some Sexy Songs 4 U (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Edit warring and failure to follow WP policies for references M48SKY (talk) 09:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-English test edits/vandalism continued past previous protection periods of 2 and 3 weeks. Volume is low but high as a percentage of legitimate editing activity. TheDragonFire (talk) 10:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Full protection Persistent content blanking- Owing to off wiki legal action being taken against Wikipedia due to contents of this page. See WP:AN#Article being reported to cyber police and [2] - Ratnahastin (talk) 10:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Anastasia Kvitko (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sydney nurses anti-Israel remarks incident (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement for Arab-Israel conflict topic area. Left guide (talk) 12:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney nurses anti-Israel remarks incident (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement for Arab-Israel conflict topic area. Left guide (talk) 12:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Bahlil Lahadalia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 12:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent, disruptive addition of unreferenced genres. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2025 ICC Champions Trophy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple new users. Vestrian24Bio 13:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- User:Thinktankresearch is edit-warring now. Vestrian24Bio 13:57, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Emily Reid (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. •Cyberwolf•. talk? 14:17, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Battle of Bhupalgarh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Ratnahastin (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:44, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Cambodian genocide denial (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Vandalism by a user led to all text and images being deleted on the 12 February. page must be given extended confirmed protection. Bird244 (talk) 14:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- CeCé Telfer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of a trans BLP. Funcrunch (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- University of California, Davis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I am One of Many (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Twinkle Khanna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated addition of poorly formated sources. Sid95Q (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Require semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism. Hbanm (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- United Lutheran Seminary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Several edits have been made that present as fact allegations from a lawsuit that has not yet been adjudicated. (Trotter v. United Lutheran Seminary) While the defendant's motion for dismissal by summary judgment was denied that does not indicate future rulings or verdicts. The edits have also made libelous statements regarding one, non-public individual in particular. 184.14.210.198 (talk) 16:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruption from anonymous and new users. If not indefinite, I would recommend a longer protection period, seeing as shorter periods have not previously worked. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Fall of Constantinople (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 16:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Template:Wikify (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer needed because the content in the site has many errors
156.107.90.74 (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment The current bluelock doesn't seem enough per recent edits, recommend goldlock. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Necessity of protection amply demonstrated. Favonian (talk) 13:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer needed as there clearly isn't any vandalism at the moment.
(2405:6E00:223A:8C3D:549A:2FF:FE75:A344 (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC))
Not unprotected – There's clearly no vandalism because the article is protected. The brief period around New Year, in which the article was unprotected, clearly demonstrated the need for protection. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
The statement 'In 1683, he invaded Portuguese Goa, during which Maratha soldiers raped Christian women and later sold captured men and women to Arabs and the Dutch' is not supported by the cited source. I have reviewed the reference, and it does not mention these claims. This statement is also present under the 'Portuguese and English' section. Who added this, and why? It appears that significant parts of this article have been negatively altered and seem to have been written by someone to portray a negative image. Please review and correct any biased or unsourced content. Arrowxw (talk) 03:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Arrowxw: Vague and sourceless requests will not be considered. (And we will not be citing Chhaava in either book or novel form; we do not cite works of fiction even if they are based on historical events.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 04:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am not citing anything. I just wanted to let you know that the above statement has no relevant references. Why has this information been added to the page? Arrowxw (talk) 04:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Arrowxw: And being an editor who pointedly avoids the Indian Subcontinent topic area, I cannot answer your question other than to say that this is not an edit request that can be acted on because it is too vague. If you want us to
review and correct any biased or unsourced content
you're more than welcome to identify where in the article other than the lead section the claim(s) you're objecting to are in. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 04:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)- I am making an edit request to remove the following statements:
- From the lead section: 'In 1683, he invaded Portuguese Goa, during which Maratha soldiers raped Christian women and later sold captured men and women to Arabs and the Dutch.'
- From the 'Portuguese and English' section: 'According to an account by Padre Francisco de Souza, Marathas looted, destroyed churches, and raped Christian women... The breasts were cut off.'
- These statements are not supported by the citations or references provided and are irrelevant to the article. Please consider removing them to maintain accuracy and neutrality." Arrowxw (talk) 04:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Arrowxw: (And for what it's worth, Maratha–Portuguese War (1683–1684) has this claim as well, with two separate sources for it.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 04:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have reviewed the sources, and it appears to be the same source. As I mentioned, these sources seem irrelevant to the statement. I have checked them and found no information that supports the claim. I believe this statement should be removed due to the lack of relevant sources. Arrowxw (talk) 04:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Arrowxw: You must have missed it then. I reviewed the source and found the passage which supports most of the claim. See Talk:Sambhaji#Fact added without citation. I did not see anything about the breast bit, but since the rest is supported I don't see any particular reason to trust your claim it isn't in the sources. Nil Einne (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Nil Einne: It's in the footnote on pg. 55 of the source cited there, and is an attributed direct quote even there. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- So, just to understand correctly—this article is based on Portuguese official records from the Goa Archives, where the Portuguese were hostile to Sambhaji Maharaj. Additionally, is it acceptable to include this information in the lead section? This approach seems unfair and biased. Arrowxw (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- What other specific published sources would you prefer us use? This isn't an insult, it's a genuine question given you've provided no other source to counter the bias you allege. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am following up on my request to remove the statements I mentioned earlier from the page, as the references used are based on Portuguese official records from the Goa Archives, which come from a historically adversarial source. This violates Wikipedia’s Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy, as it does not present a balanced perspective.
- Additionally, the statement has been deliberately placed in the lead section to portray a negative image, which is not a standard practice in similar articles. I request a review and removal of this biased content to ensure neutrality and consistency across Wikipedia. Arrowxw (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Arrowxw: I don't think you've read many other articles if you assume that to be the case. Lede sections contain negative information all the time if they're a significant part of the subject's life/history (as an example, Phil Spector). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- So, just to understand correctly—this article is based on Portuguese official records from the Goa Archives, where the Portuguese were hostile to Sambhaji Maharaj. Additionally, is it acceptable to include this information in the lead section? This approach seems unfair and biased. Arrowxw (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Nil Einne: It's in the footnote on pg. 55 of the source cited there, and is an attributed direct quote even there. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Arrowxw: You must have missed it then. I reviewed the source and found the passage which supports most of the claim. See Talk:Sambhaji#Fact added without citation. I did not see anything about the breast bit, but since the rest is supported I don't see any particular reason to trust your claim it isn't in the sources. Nil Einne (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have reviewed the sources, and it appears to be the same source. As I mentioned, these sources seem irrelevant to the statement. I have checked them and found no information that supports the claim. I believe this statement should be removed due to the lack of relevant sources. Arrowxw (talk) 04:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Arrowxw: And being an editor who pointedly avoids the Indian Subcontinent topic area, I cannot answer your question other than to say that this is not an edit request that can be acted on because it is too vague. If you want us to
- I am not citing anything. I just wanted to let you know that the above statement has no relevant references. Why has this information been added to the page? Arrowxw (talk) 04:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Rumel Ahmed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I would like to request that the page User:Jabiyan/sandbox be moved to Rumel Ahmed. The draft has been significantly improved and is ready for review. However, the page "Rumel Ahmed" is still locked due to old logs. I would appreciate guidance on how to move the page once it's finalized. . Jabiyan (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Submit it for review. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:04, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Willy Schaeffler (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Herr Scheffler was also designer of Copper Mountains National Ski Championships in the early and mid 1980's as a close friend to Chuck Lewis Copper s owner and founder Willy was a frequent visiter al Copper 2600:6C67:127F:FFCD:D966:21B:F8D5:B671 (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Willy Schaeffler is not protected. Remember to include reliable sources for your claim. Favonian (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
6 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC) |
21 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:07, 19 February 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser( · view requests)
I would like to use AWB for repetitive editing tasks. I do these a lot for the projects I am a part of, and they have become very tedious. Edit: one of the projects I am a part of for a Church, does not have very many active contributors but a very large backlog. The effort to maintain the articles we have would be largely simplified by using AWB. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed( · view requests)
This is a (new) alt account of User:RedactedHumanoid, and has been created with the sole purpose to edit articles that I do not want to edit on my main account (NSFW articles, etc). Most of these articles are semi-protected, so I am requesting confirmed rights so I can edit those pages. RedactedHumanoid66 (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed( · view requests)
Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:
I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to translate the article for "Carlos y Jose" into English. I would also like to translate the article for Infinity ECHS into German. I have already translated the Infinity ECHS article into Spanish. WesWall2003 (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
I was previously an editor here with an extended confirmed account (User:M3ATH). I am now on this account and would like the extended confirmed right to be transferred. MT(710) 16:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
---|
Event coordinator( · view requests)
I will facilitate an editathon on 5 March at this event. saebou (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer( · view requests)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have authored a few articles, improved the quality of many articles including adding high quality references and improving encyclopedic quality. I have also limited experiences in deletion. I also have just been granted AFC reviewer options and starting to increase my participation in that. Welcome feedback if I can qualify. Thanks for the consideration Trex32 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Though I predominantly work with redirects, at least recently, I also engage with new pages and would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. I have made almost 46,000 edits and believe that I can help. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to be a new page reviewer, I continuously contribute to New Pages and having failed the previous request to be one, i would like to try once again having positively learned more and contributed to much more new pages. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
I have authored a few articles, commonly support and help new editors, and enjoy helping the community by encouraging proper creation of articles and assisting with maintenance. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC) |
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
---|
Page mover( · view requests)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer( · view requests)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia and focused on editing articles, reviewing new pages & combating vandalism. I am requesting for PCR right to speeding up the review process for pending changes. I am familiar with key Wikipedia content policies, including vandalism, biographies of living persons (BLP), neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability, and copyright compliance. I've also been involved in patrolling recent changes, where I use Twinkle tool to revert vandalism. With my experience and understanding of these policies, I believe that I can effectively contribute to reviewing pending changes. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I patrol recent changes, mainly for vandalism, but I also get in contact with a lot of pending changes and like to help. I am familiar with the related policies. Squawk7700 (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting reviewer rights to help improve the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia articles, particularly in areas related to Pakistan and some notable international articles like television shows and international cricket. I also created a page Kana Yaari directly, which is a result of my performances on Wikipedia. I have gained experience through consistent and constructive editing, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, including neutral point of view, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. I aim to assist in maintaining the integrity of semi-protected pages and contribute to the efficient review of pending changes. Currently I'm a auto confirmed user rights. Sackiii (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback( · view requests)
after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I've recently come across several instances where rollbacking would be faster than manually reverting nonconstructive consecutive edits. I don't patrol Recent Changes, but I am quite active and have more than 3,100 pages on my Watchlist. Thanks for your consideration. PRRfan (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: The main thing I do on Wikipedia is watch the recent changes page for changes that are not constructive. I would like these permissions so that instead of having to click the article > click view history > click undo, I would be able to just click one button. This would make what I mainly do MUCH easier, and would allow me to more quickly undo nonconstructive edits. MersmanD (talk) 16:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
I go through period a of spending lots of time patrolling recent changes, and rollback would make my task much more easier and efficient by giving me access to tools like juggle, and antivandal. Wolfwolfnuke (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC) |
There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
---|
Template editor( · view requests)
|
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
|
|
- User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
|
Barnstars
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you! Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC) |
You must be logged in to post a comment.