Talk:WPGH-TV/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 08:24, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 22:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Next one :), comments to follow. Dracophyllum 22:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1a)
    • "In 2003, Sinclair converted it to its News Central hybrid format, which led to ratings declines." > which lead to a decline in ratings.
    • "Further, UHF stations performed poorly in rougher terrain" > Further from what.
    • prose otherwise flawless. @Sammi Brie:
    Awesome, I have embarrassingly few comments which is a testament to the quality of your GANs. Another nice one, passing now. Dracophyllum 20:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1b) MOS good checkY
  • 2a) Ref layout is consistent checkY
  • 2b) Sources are RS as either GOV or local news checkY
  • 2c) Spot checking is clean checkY
    • ref 2, good
    • ref 22, good
    • ref 42, good
    • ref 67, good
    • ref 82, good
    • ref 102, good
  • 2d) earwig clean checkY
  • 3a) 3b) good overview of history, good level of focus checkYcheckY
  • 4) neutral checkY
  • 5) stable checkY
  • 6a) freely licensed checkY
  • 6b) appropriate checkY

Sorry for slow response, I am very busy rn but should have time in a week. Dracophyllum 22:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]