Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 08:24, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 22:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Next one :), comments to follow. Dracophyllum 22:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 1a)
  • "In 2003, Sinclair converted it to its News Central hybrid format, which led to ratings declines." > which lead to a decline in ratings.
  • "Further, UHF stations performed poorly in rougher terrain" > Further from what.
  • prose otherwise flawless. @Sammi Brie:
    • Thanks Dracophyllum, just tweaked both of these. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 16:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Awesome, I have embarrassingly few comments which is a testament to the quality of your GANs. Another nice one, passing now. Dracophyllum 20:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 1b) MOS good Y
• 2a) Ref layout is consistent Y
• 2b) Sources are RS as either GOV or local news Y
• 2c) Spot checking is clean Y
  • ref 2, good
  • ref 22, good
  • ref 42, good
  • ref 67, good
  • ref 82, good
  • ref 102, good
• 2d) earwig clean Y
• 3a) 3b) good overview of history, good level of focus YY
• 4) neutral Y
• 5) stable Y
• 6a) freely licensed Y
• 6b) appropriate Y

Sorry for slow response, I am very busy rn but should have time in a week. Dracophyllum 22:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]